So a law from 1604 might decide about how the Brexit thing will end up... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Paul Markham · 03-25-2019, 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks

Paul... most immigrants who moved to the UK since the EU were Europeans with a higher education than the local pale-turd-community. Thats how much UK government fucked up... In need of immigrants because of a lack of educated locals.

So why not implicate a filtering system so only the more educated are allowed in?

Why not spend more in getting Brits up to standard?

Why allow EU migrants to access welfare?

Blair is responsible for the mess the UK are now in. He allowed an open door policy and didn't introduce strict rules on benefits.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.u...labour-market/

What were the terms of reference for this. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.u...labour-market/

Does it include the cost of a house?

I'm not anti-migration, my immediate family includes one UK residing family. My Brother, parents and me all emigrated from the UK. But we contributed in very positive ways. Which is something all migrants should do.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.u...labour-market/

https://fullfact.org/europe/are-ther...u-migrants-uk/

NewNick · 03-25-2019, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks

Extra Extra! Read all about it:

“Re-located ECONOMIC MIGRANT rather have decentralized bureaucracy”.

“Mr Markham rather sees himself ruled by Brits while relocated in CZ”

“Brits are so arrogant they even dont accept foreign rule when living overseas”.

“British nationalist pensionadas who fled to the continent love britain so much that they spend their brittish money overseas”.

Fixed that for you.

I wonder if Paul realises that he might have to fuck off back home should "no-deal" become a reality ?

NewNick · 03-25-2019, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So why not implicate a filtering system so only the more educated are allowed in?

What level are you educated to Paul ?

Paul Markham · 03-25-2019, 03:44 AM

The problem with the EU is they have achieved nothing that non-EU countries have done.

All the claims are rubbish when one looks around the world at other countries. Trade, Commerce, Economy, Law and Order, Migration, Border Security, Terrorism, etc. The facts prove that the EU is often worse at regulating these areas. Weighed down by a suffocating bureaucracy, the mission to create something to please everyone and achieves in pleasing no one. Even the simple act of launching a single currency was beyond them.

They were more interested in getting the Euro into as many countries as possible, they abandoned simple rules. Such as a Central Bank controlling borrowing and spending, then allowed countries with a bad fiscal record to join the Euro. This is the result. https://www.statista.com/statistics/...c-product-gdp/

So please tell us all what are the benefits of the EU, that non-EU countries can't achieve?

Paul Markham · 03-25-2019, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick

What level are you educated to Paul ?

Explain why a filtering system is so hard. After all most countries have one, it's only the EU that doesn't.

We can test your level of education.

nico-t · 03-25-2019, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StefanG

Amusing, you might say.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47614074

Thing is: EU would not allow any other deal to be submitted than the one that was negotiated for two years now.

Which leaves two options - no deal (which was just denied by the parliament but legally they wouldn't be bound to it) or a delay (which all 27 EU members would have to agree to - which they only would do if anything substantial was presented by the UK)

Meanwhile Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson are still paid by taxpayers but fucked off from their responsibilties for this mess.

Congrats.

I find it very odd that you seem to be enjoying how May and the EU are sabotaging a democratic vote by the majority of the British people.

Paul Markham · 03-25-2019, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

I find it very odd that you seem to be enjoying how May and the EU are sabotaging a democratic vote by the majority of the British people.

He's not a supporter of Brexit. Even his last comment implies that everyone must agree with him.

MaDalton · 03-25-2019, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Migration, illegal migration, Court of Justice of the European Union , trade negotiations, Inefficient policies, Problems of the Euro, More bureaucracy less democracy, Leaving Is A Problem, Takes Power From Governments, Serves The Interest As A Whole, Not A Country, Schengen treaty, unable to fix problems, food prices.

The real reason is there's no need for the EU. The EU has done nothing that other countries haven't or can't do better without handing power over to a centralist bureaucracy.

just throwing words around is no answer, Paul. How does the court of justice of the EU affect you negatively?

How does the Schengen treaty affect you negatively, Paul? Considering that you personally are benefitting from it.

No answers, Paul, no answers. As usual.

MaDalton · 03-25-2019, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t

I find it very odd that you seem to be enjoying how May and the EU are sabotaging a democratic vote by the majority of the British people.

a vote that was based on lies and misinformation (as even admitted by Nigel Farage).

what's your solution in regards to the back stop btw?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

He's not a supporter of Brexit. Even his last comment implies that everyone must agree with him.

Of course I am not a supporter of Brexit. Because it's stupid.

Quote:

In January 2019 Britain will officially switch from a pro-Brexit to an anti-Brexit country, and this is how we know

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a8541576.html

Also:

So- why is that suddenly no option anymore? An informed decision after 2 years of negotiations?

Paul Markham · 03-26-2019, 07:17 AM

[QUOTE]

Quote:

Originally Posted by StefanG

a vote that was based on lies and misinformation (as even admitted by Nigel Farage).

what's your solution in regards to the back stop btw?

Why should there not be a backstop on the side of Eire. If the EU insists, let them carry the blame. Even splitting up the UK would suit me, why should the democratic process be denied.

Quote:

Of course I am not a supporter of Brexit. Because it's stupid.

Stupid to want more control over the people who rule you. Is that how the Nazis got in?

Quote:

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a8541576.html

Also:

So- why is that suddenly no option anymore? An informed decision after 2 years of negotiations?

To get the best deal the UK needed a strong leader. One that told the EU there would be no negotiations on a divorce bill, no guarantying of EU migrants in the UK before a trade deal was negotiated. To tell the EU that a second referendum was going to happen after the negotiations was to guaranty a bad deal.

As you can't give good reasons for the EU other than losing democracy is stupid. Here's prime reason for leaving the EU.

Why allow countries with such bad economies, poor GDP, bad government spending to join the EU. Other than they provide a huge low wage work force? The markets to sell aren't great as we've seen and these countries get money pumped into them, which makes getting their votes easy.

Come on Stefan you're making this easy for me.

MaDalton · 03-26-2019, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Come on Stefan you're making this easy for me.

I am making it indeed very easy to expose your stupidity, that's correct

03-25-2019, 03:44 AM	#54
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	The problem with the EU is they have achieved nothing that non-EU countries have done. All the claims are rubbish when one looks around the world at other countries. Trade, Commerce, Economy, Law and Order, Migration, Border Security, Terrorism, etc. The facts prove that the EU is often worse at regulating these areas. Weighed down by a suffocating bureaucracy, the mission to create something to please everyone and achieves in pleasing no one. Even the simple act of launching a single currency was beyond them. They were more interested in getting the Euro into as many countries as possible, they abandoned simple rules. Such as a Central Bank controlling borrowing and spending, then allowed countries with a bad fiscal record to join the Euro. This is the result. https://www.statista.com/statistics/...c-product-gdp/ So please tell us all what are the benefits of the EU, that non-EU countries can't achieve? __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70