![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 339
|
Kansas Sues MET ART under AV Law, Should I be worried?
If I have servers in Kansas and my xxx photo websites are accessible to everyone without verification, and I don't have age verification, am I at risk? Can I be sued?
https://www.xbiz.com/news/286688/kan...r-under-av-law "Should I move my servers and block people from Kansas?"m |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
SEO Connoisseur
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 16,607
|
Quote:
Kansas passed an age verification law in 2024 that requires websites where 25% or more of content is "harmful to minors" to verify users are 18 or older. Without proper age verification for your adult websites, you face significant legal risk. The Kansas Attorney General is actively enforcing this law with multiple lawsuits already filed against adult website operators. In May 2025, sites including Chaturbate and Jerkmate were sued for failing to implement age verification. Penalties include fines up to $10,000 per violation, and parents can sue for damages starting at $50,000. Some major adult sites like Pornhub have chosen to block Kansas users entirely rather than implement verification. A Supreme Court case (Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton) is reviewing a similar Texas law, but until a ruling is issued, the Kansas law remains enforceable. Your options include implementing proper age verification, moving servers outside Kansas, blocking Kansas users, or waiting for the Supreme Court ruling (though this last option carries significant risk as enforcement continues).
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Unregistered Abuser
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 25,602
|
Libz pwnd 🍿😎🍿
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
GFY'S #1 retard
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 10,748
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() There are soooooooooooo many ways to block adult content if you want to block it completely at your house... Definitely could see bad actors getting an old laptop, browsing adult for awhile on it, then a year later claiming their kid is mentally scarred from porn use and suing every website on the list. ![]()
__________________
I make my money from people jerking off |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
WIFE CHANGING MONEY
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: usa
Posts: 5,015
|
![]() I remember the days when spamming porn was still legal
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
making it rain
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 22,052
|
Quote:
https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/...uits-explainer The plaintiff’s allege that Q.R.'s mother installed filters on his personal devices, but claim the minor was still able to access adult sites using an old laptop in his mother’s closet which did not have a filter installed. Over a period of several months, he allegedly accessed adult sites more than 175 times. The lawsuit claims that adult sites are liable for damages of approximately $75,000 for time Q.R. visited a site. While Kansas law provides statutory damages of $50,000 for violations of the law, plaintiffs are asking for additional damages citing “pain, suffering, disability, disfigurement and mental anguish,” “psychological injury,” “past and future loss of enjoyment and pleasure of living,” and “past and future necessary medical expenses.” |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
SEO Connoisseur
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brantford, Ontario
Posts: 16,607
|
as said I am not a lawyer and how they come up with that figure I don't know
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |