Posting movies or pics? - GoFuckYourself.com

Crutch · 06-17-2001, 01:30 AM

Hey everyone,

Which convert better for you? I know there's that whole debate about not giving out to much free content, or limiting it to show less hardcore, etc. Regardless, I find that movie posting converts betters even though most of it shows more hardcore. Go figure...

Maybe cause not a lot of people post movies and there harder to come by or find by the sufer? My thought is when a surfer see's a movie he really like, then he wants the full screen with sound and the whole movie clip..so he goes looking for it at the sponser. Then again, who knows...

What do you think?

Steve · 06-17-2001, 03:38 PM

I think you have to edit the movie clip so that you leave the surfer wanting more. Here is what I mean:

Say I make a cumshot gallery. I have 10-15 pics of cumshots. Maybe I add 1-3 mpg clips to the page. These clips are real short, and I try to use blowjob clips (NOT cumshot). Let the surfer see the girl suck/stroke, and maybe even open her mouth..... but to see the pop shot, they gotta pay my sponsor. I can't see why guys make galleries with 10 hardcore movie clips.

Crutch · 06-18-2001, 01:13 AM

Thanks for the imput Steve. I'll give that a shot.

Just been running tests like this for the past two weeks daily to see which convert better. Seems like movies do for me...now i'm just trying figure out why they pull better.

Maybe cause there's to many picture galleries? Any experience or thoughts on this?

brocklanders · 06-18-2001, 01:30 AM

Hi Crutch,

Not sure if they convert better or not, but does the better conversion justify the added bandwidth costs? Let me know what you find....

--Brock

06-17-2001, 01:30 AM	#1
Crutch Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 224	Posting movies or pics? Hey everyone, Which convert better for you? I know there's that whole debate about not giving out to much free content, or limiting it to show less hardcore, etc. Regardless, I find that movie posting converts betters even though most of it shows more hardcore. Go figure... Maybe cause not a lot of people post movies and there harder to come by or find by the sufer? My thought is when a surfer see's a movie he really like, then he wants the full screen with sound and the whole movie clip..so he goes looking for it at the sponser. Then again, who knows... What do you think?

06-17-2001, 03:38 PM	#2
Steve Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: USA Posts: 6,894	I think you have to edit the movie clip so that you leave the surfer wanting more. Here is what I mean: Say I make a cumshot gallery. I have 10-15 pics of cumshots. Maybe I add 1-3 mpg clips to the page. These clips are real short, and I try to use blowjob clips (NOT cumshot). Let the surfer see the girl suck/stroke, and maybe even open her mouth..... but to see the pop shot, they gotta pay my sponsor. I can't see why guys make galleries with 10 hardcore movie clips.

06-18-2001, 01:13 AM	#3
Crutch Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 224	Thanks for the imput Steve. I'll give that a shot. Just been running tests like this for the past two weeks daily to see which convert better. Seems like movies do for me...now i'm just trying figure out why they pull better. Maybe cause there's to many picture galleries? Any experience or thoughts on this?

06-18-2001, 01:30 AM	#4
brocklanders Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 297	Hi Crutch, Not sure if they convert better or not, but does the better conversion justify the added bandwidth costs? Let me know what you find.... --Brock