united states vs extreme associates - GoFuckYourself.com

latinasojourn · 11-10-2004, 07:03 PM

for you intellectuals.

my money is that the US DOJ will fail to convict, due to privacy issues:

(and i personally think extreme associates puts out total shit content---but the central issue is going to be privacy---and it's ramifications for adult webmasters selling adult material to consenting adults)

and IF the government loses the case against extreme associates what do they do next?

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=204236

bignasty · 11-10-2004, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by latinasojourn

http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=204236

I read that article the other day, iinteresting read

Probono · 11-10-2004, 07:11 PM

Much as I agree that the content they sell is harmful to the industry, the principles in the case are critical to all of us. Let's hope they win.

KRL · 11-10-2004, 07:14 PM

You never know with these kinds of cases.

GatorB · 11-10-2004, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Probono
Much as I agree that the content they sell is harmful to the industry, the principles in the case are critical to all of us. Let's hope they win.

I find what they put out is disgusting but many Hollywood movies have violent rape scenes which they justify by having someone become a vigilante and kill the rapists. Is anything EA puts out any less violent than the Passion? I'm asking because I've seen neither.

CamChicks · 11-10-2004, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Probono
Much as I agree that the content they sell is harmful to the industry, the principles in the case are critical to all of us. Let's hope they win.

No more harmful than horror movies are to hollywood.

Fletch XXX · 11-10-2004, 07:21 PM

mmmm im glad the japanese put out good movies like ichi the killer and visitor q

GatorB · 11-10-2004, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CamChicks
No more harmful than horror movies are to hollywood.

I saw Hannibal where the guy cuts off the top of the skull of his victim while he's still alive and cuts out part of his brain and makes him eat it. Why doesn't Bush go after that crap.

Joe Citizen · 11-10-2004, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GatorB
I saw Hannibal where the guy cuts off the top of the skull of his victim while he's still alive and cuts out part of his brain and makes him eat it. Why doesn't Bush go after that crap.

Uh, because it's just a movie and not real.

kane · 11-10-2004, 07:31 PM

this is a big case for the adult industry as a whole. Not because everyone puts out this type of material - most do not, but because if extreme wins it is a big blow to the government. extreme's main defense is that the comunity standard of indecency should not be applied here because the material in question is viewed in a private home thus the community is not involved. It is different if they went to a brick and mortar store and bought this because the store exists in the community. If they lose, it could allow the government to go after any website because it would set the standard that sitting in your bedroom surfing a porn site is still beholden to the community standard. If the gov. loses it will pretty hard for them to sucessfully go after websites.

Like most, I think the content they put out is sick and harmful to the adult industries image as a whole, but I hope they win.

GatorB · 11-10-2004, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Uh, because it's just a movie and not real.

I don't think the dudes at EA are actually raping and killing the girl in thier movies either. And that scene in Hannibal look pretty real.

jonesy · 11-10-2004, 07:44 PM

extreme will win.

but the cost is

theyre out of business and will be personally flat broke.

just what certain people wanted.

jonesy · 11-10-2004, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kane
If they lose, it could allow the government to go after any website

not at all. if that were tha case sites woulda been shut down years ago.

the person surfing is breaking their community standards/laws by accessing material thasts deemed illegal in that community. not the site itself

extreme sold actual tapes also and thats a large part of it.

11-10-2004, 07:03 PM	#1
latinasojourn Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 3,191	united states vs extreme associates for you intellectuals. my money is that the US DOJ will fail to convict, due to privacy issues: (and i personally think extreme associates puts out total shit content---but the central issue is going to be privacy---and it's ramifications for adult webmasters selling adult material to consenting adults) and IF the government loses the case against extreme associates what do they do next? http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=204236

11-10-2004, 07:14 PM	#4
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	You never know with these kinds of cases. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

11-10-2004, 07:21 PM	#7
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	mmmm im glad the japanese put out good movies like ichi the killer and visitor q __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

11-10-2004, 07:44 PM	#12
jonesy Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 6,688	extreme will win. but the cost is theyre out of business and will be personally flat broke. just what certain people wanted. __________________ . Shooting Bikini Girls

11-10-2004, 07:11 PM	#3
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	Much as I agree that the content they sell is harmful to the industry, the principles in the case are critical to all of us. Let's hope they win.

11-10-2004, 07:31 PM	#10
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	this is a big case for the adult industry as a whole. Not because everyone puts out this type of material - most do not, but because if extreme wins it is a big blow to the government. extreme's main defense is that the comunity standard of indecency should not be applied here because the material in question is viewed in a private home thus the community is not involved. It is different if they went to a brick and mortar store and bought this because the store exists in the community. If they lose, it could allow the government to go after any website because it would set the standard that sitting in your bedroom surfing a porn site is still beholden to the community standard. If the gov. loses it will pretty hard for them to sucessfully go after websites. Like most, I think the content they put out is sick and harmful to the adult industries image as a whole, but I hope they win.