![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under the Rainbow
Posts: 2,731
|
Sponsors beware- A spamming affiliate can do you in
This is so on point to all here that it deserves more exposure.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6812669/ "There's a message here for anybody running an affiliate program; you need to monitor what the third parties are doing," she said. "If you are using a business model that recruits others, you are strictly liable for the practices of those third parties. It's not just the people who push the button. It's the business that provides the financial incentive. The law is clear and strict." A federal district court has issued a temporary restraining order against the defendants, barring them from sending more spam and freezing their assets, pending a preliminary hearing. The FTC said this was its sixth CAN-SPAM lawsuit, but the first involving pornography. According to the FTC, the defendants spammed hundreds of thousands of consumers with sexually-explicit or sexually-suggestive e-mails. The FTC alleges that the defendants did not include the required ?SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:? warning in the subject line of the e-mails, or failed to exclude the sexually oriented material from the "initially-viewable" content of the messages. Defendants in the complaint include: Global Net Solutions, based in Las Vegas, Nevada; Global Net Ventures, Ltd., based in London, England; Wedlake, Ltd, allegedly based in Riga, Latvia; Open Space Enterprises, Inc., based in Las Vegas; Southlake Group, Inc., based in Las Vegas; WTFRC, Inc., doing business as Reflected Networks, Inc., based in Las Vegas; Dustin Hamilton; Tobin Banks; Gregory Hamilton; Philip Doroff; and Paul Rose. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 35,218
|
one more way they will try and nail us without having to use anything related to the 1st amendment. It's only just the start be prepared.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MaxCash.com
Posts: 12,745
|
More companies going off shore
The more Bush and his cronies push He must know that it wont go away and he may as well try to regualte it rather than ban it... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,926
|
BUMP
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
►SouthOfHeaven
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
|
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |