Does content in the wet t-shirts/strip to win, drunk girls niche must comply to 2257? - GoFuckYourself.com

Quotealex · 05-27-2005, 04:33 PM

If yes, I don't see how in the hell people catering to this niche will be able to comply!

Easton · 05-27-2005, 04:35 PM

sure it has to comply and there's no way in hell they'll be able to... then again, it's only illegal when you get caught

After Shock Media · 05-27-2005, 04:39 PM

You have several niches rolled up into one.

Wet T-shirt, generally I would say no. There is no lascivious exhibition of the genital or pubic region.
Stripping would/could fall under the same context largely dependant on each instance.
Drunk girls, well depends on what they do. Not to mention the whole damn release/contract under the influence part of it. Public and staged would be a whole different arena.

cyber_ninja · 05-27-2005, 04:41 PM

i dont know,but im trying to get my post count up so im posting anyways

TheMob · 05-27-2005, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyber_ninja

i dont know,but im trying to get my post count up so im posting anyways

I hear you, man

wtfent · 05-27-2005, 04:53 PM

You should still get 2257 paperwork whenever possible but read on....

Case law and legal opinions support the position that a person who is attracting attention to themselves while in a public place may be photographed or videotaped. Examples include both surveillance cameras and news shows such as 60 Minutes that use hidden cameras and "surprise attack" interviews. Certainly, the display nudity in public is newsworthy and of public interest.

"Newsworthy" is the basis for protection under the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. The concept is that the public has the right to know what occurs, especially, if it is on government property or in a place that the public is invited to be. As long as there is no "staging," "directing," or "scripts" by law you still need 2257 if it shows pink but it is our american right to our 1st Amendment so you would have a very good fight in court. If the videos present true life occurrences and tell the story of what tapers actually see at an event. As such, they are protected by the Constitution and by case law as both "newsworthy" and documentary footage.

Kingfish · 05-27-2005, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

You have several niches rolled up into one.

Wet T-shirt, generally I would say no. There is no lascivious exhibition of the genital or pubic region.
Stripping would/could fall under the same context largely dependant on each instance.
Drunk girls, well depends on what they do. Not to mention the whole damn release/contract under the influence part of it. Public and staged would be a whole different arena.

Read 2257 and 2256

Quote:

There is no lascivious exhibition of the genital or pubic region.

This type of activity alone does not require 2257 documentation.

After Shock Media · 05-27-2005, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kingfish

Read 2257 and 2256

This type of activity alone does not require 2257 documentation.

that is what I said.

Terry · 05-27-2005, 05:44 PM

So is that a no? If so, then I know which site I have start!

Quotealex · 05-27-2005, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

You have several niches rolled up into one.
.

IMO they're pretty much the sama niche: All about girls behaving baddly in public

Kingfish · 05-27-2005, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

that is what I said.

What I am saying is even if there is lascivious exhibition of the genital or pubic region no 2257 records are required.

WWC-Moe B. · 05-27-2005, 05:55 PM

so far that's a gray area, however it would be very hard to get the 2257 docs...

We have been on top of this issue and still a gray area.

Good luck

wtfent · 05-28-2005, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moe B.

so far that's a gray area, however it would be very hard to get the 2257 docs...

We have been on top of this issue and still a gray area.

Good luck

I agree. Im in the same boat as you are

Manowar · 05-28-2005, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyber_ninja

i dont know,but im trying to get my post count up so im posting anyways

VideoJ · 05-28-2005, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry

So is that a no? If so, then I know which site I have start!

That's a "you really want to have a long talk with your lawyer before you even think about setting up these sites"

Dalai lama · 05-28-2005, 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyber_ninja

i dont know,but im trying to get my post count up so im posting anyways

You're going smooth, dont stop now.

MegWhite · 05-28-2005, 04:51 AM

when will the next elections take place in te USA ??
this law can NOT exist
vote, kick'em out, have the law changed or we'll all have to go work on something else

05-27-2005, 04:33 PM	#1
Quotealex Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: The Global Digerati Village Posts: 6,265	Does content in the wet t-shirts/strip to win, drunk girls niche must comply to 2257? If yes, I don't see how in the hell people catering to this niche will be able to comply!

05-27-2005, 04:35 PM	#2
Easton Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 9,825	sure it has to comply and there's no way in hell they'll be able to... then again, it's only illegal when you get caught __________________ New models booked and shot every week... MILFs, pornstars and teens. Girls for every niche and project. Looking for high-quality affordable exclusive content? Check me out at Easton Content for all the details.

05-27-2005, 04:39 PM	#3
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	You have several niches rolled up into one. Wet T-shirt, generally I would say no. There is no lascivious exhibition of the genital or pubic region. Stripping would/could fall under the same context largely dependant on each instance. Drunk girls, well depends on what they do. Not to mention the whole damn release/contract under the influence part of it. Public and staged would be a whole different arena. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

05-27-2005, 04:53 PM	#6
wtfent Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: San Diego, Cali. baby!!! Posts: 3,790	You should still get 2257 paperwork whenever possible but read on.... Case law and legal opinions support the position that a person who is attracting attention to themselves while in a public place may be photographed or videotaped. Examples include both surveillance cameras and news shows such as 60 Minutes that use hidden cameras and "surprise attack" interviews. Certainly, the display nudity in public is newsworthy and of public interest. "Newsworthy" is the basis for protection under the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. The concept is that the public has the right to know what occurs, especially, if it is on government property or in a place that the public is invited to be. As long as there is no "staging," "directing," or "scripts" by law you still need 2257 if it shows pink but it is our american right to our 1st Amendment so you would have a very good fight in court. If the videos present true life occurrences and tell the story of what tapers actually see at an event. As such, they are protected by the Constitution and by case law as both "newsworthy" and documentary footage. __________________ ThisWillShockYou.com DVD Store - TWSY UNCENSORED ICQ# 194020367 E-mail: shockingbucks(AT)gmail.com Promote something different!! Shocking Bucks

05-27-2005, 05:55 PM	#12
WWC-Moe B. Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,546	so far that's a gray area, however it would be very hard to get the 2257 docs... We have been on top of this issue and still a gray area. Good luck __________________ Moe B. [email protected] ICQ - 286024627 Now get full videos with Matching High Res Photos !!! " CONTENT PROVIDER OF THE YEAR! " ~ XBIZ 2007, 2008 and 2009 AWARDS WINNER New IP-TV Streaming Technology Feeds for Your Site ! www.WorldWideFeeds.com !!!

05-27-2005, 04:41 PM	#4
cyber_ninja Twerk That Ass Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Lincoln, California Posts: 2,197	i dont know,but im trying to get my post count up so im posting anyways

05-27-2005, 05:44 PM	#9
Terry Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,604	So is that a no? If so, then I know which site I have start!

05-28-2005, 04:51 AM	#17
MegWhite Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: planet earth Posts: 207	when will the next elections take place in te USA ?? this law can NOT exist vote, kick'em out, have the law changed or we'll all have to go work on something else __________________ SEE MY ARS BYOTS !!!! SEE MY XXX PORTFOLIO ICQ > 321277443