![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 960
|
![]() AdultLounge is addressing this issue by working with our attorneys and organizations like the Free Speech Coalition to be fully compliant and make this as painless as possible for our affiliates. Here is a letter from our attorney. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at 888-ADULT-50 or simply hit me up on ICQ:282499836
THE LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY J. DOUGLAS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1717 FOURTH STREET, THIRD FLOOR SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401-3319 TELEPHONE (310) 576-3411 TELECOPIER (310) 576-3408 June 20, 2005 Re: Secondary Producer Records Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2257 To Whom It May Concern: I represent Adultlounge.com. We received your inquiry concerning copies of records for secondary producers. I am very familiar with 18 U.S.C. § 2257 in my capacities as a First Amendment and criminal defense practitioner, the Chairman Emeritus of the First Amendment Lawyers Association and the Chair of the Board of the industry?s trade association, the Free Speech Coalition. I write this letter exclusively in my capacity as Adultlounge.com?s attorney. Despite General Gonzalez? efforts at reviving the concept of ?secondary producers? in the most recent version of regulations in support of 18 U.S.C. § 2257, the concept is not supported by the statute itself. The only case addressing the issue, Sundance Assocs. Inc. v. Reno, 139 F.3d 804, 807 (10th Cir.1998), held that the ?secondary producer? requirements of the regulations to be unconstitutional. We rely on that holding, and further decline to violate the privacy of the performing artists by disseminating private data when not required to do so by law. If you have any questions regarding this policy, please do not hesitate to call, or have your attorney do so. Sincerely, The Law Office of Jeffrey J. Douglas By: Jeffrey J. Douglas Jeffrey J. Douglas cc: Adultlounge.com
__________________
Art Del Gado ICQ: 616143 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
jellyfish
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
|
A bit late, but nice move Adult Lounge. Same lawyer working with OCCash i think.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sofa King Band
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outside the box
Posts: 29,903
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 960
|
yes.. we have the same attorney
![]()
__________________
Art Del Gado ICQ: 616143 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |