|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
06-22-2005, 02:05 AM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Teh Interweb
Posts: 2,439
|
2257 Injunction would only cover 6 states?
I just read the new Xbiz World and ran across this from Gregory Piccionelli.
"While the resoning employed by the court in sundate was constitutionally sound, the applicability of the ruling has always only extended to to the states within the 10th Circut (Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma)." Does this mean that an injunction in that same 10th Circut would only cover businesses located within those states? Please let me know if im just smoking crack. |
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:09 AM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,944
|
You seem very sober to me...
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:11 AM
|
#3 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
Technically yes, although Federal injunctions are usually honored throughout the country, the other districts are not obligated to honor it.
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:17 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 38,323
|
Quote:
 ADG Webmaster |
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:29 AM
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Teh Interweb
Posts: 2,439
|
 |
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:34 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Teh Interweb
Posts: 2,439
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:36 AM
|
#7 | |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
Quote:
Precisely |
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 02:38 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Teh Interweb
Posts: 2,439
|
Quote:
 |
|
|
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 04:25 AM
|
#9 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
|
what are our chances of winning this time?
|
|
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 12:24 AM
|
#10 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Political subdivision United States, Continent North America, Planet Earth, Sol System, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 282
|
technically yes, effectively no.
And it's unlikely the government would push it. |
|
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 12:29 AM
|
#11 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: My High Horse
Posts: 6,334
|
your state doesnt "honor" anything
the injunction applies only to the district it is granted in, but being that it is the US court other districts wouldnt likely act outside of this agreement mostly because this is the domain of the dept of justice, they decide whom and and where to go after. Thus the agreement is pretty much going to apply to all US Districts
__________________
Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz. |
|
|
|
|
06-23-2005, 02:35 AM
|
#12 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,277
|
the actual document is a very interesting read
|
|
|
|
