Utah case hinges on obscenity definition - GoFuckYourself.com

pornguy · 03-08-2006, 11:37 AM

(March 8) Child pornography charges against a former Utah television weatherman and his business partner may hinge on whether photos the two men posted on the Internet of young girls in lingerie meet the federal definition of sexually explicit conduct. A defense attorney argues that as long as the children aren?t naked, the photographs aren?t sexually explicit.

The rest of the story

While this does not apply directly to us, because of the content the guys were using, it will be interesting to see how this does effect us.

gornyhuy · 03-08-2006, 11:43 AM

Eeeeeesh.

G-Rotica · 03-08-2006, 11:51 AM

Ugh. Blame porn.

RawAlex · 03-08-2006, 11:57 AM

The biggest problem in this is that at the end of the day, our industry gets tricked into having to support these dimwads because if they lose, the potential is that all of 2257 goes to shit because the definition of sexually explicit as a legal construct could be changed.

All or nothing. Black or white. right or wrong. It's a new world order.

Alex

GlydeGirl · 03-08-2006, 12:04 PM

These guys ARE exploiting the kids, but know the laws and are keeping to the letter of them, if not the spirit! And if this guy Duhamel lives in Bountiful, is he a Mormon? I could easily see how living in a Mormon community would allow these men access to numerous little girls -- heck they could even "marry" the girls at age 14.

I think this is a case of a couple of sick fucks who are just a little too smart for their own good.

tony286 · 03-08-2006, 12:21 PM

very creepy stuff and the parents where in on it yuck

je_rome · 03-09-2006, 03:14 AM

i hope justice will not be delayed and denied by some technical definition of child pornography... though it is very important, the magistrates of law should never fail to protect the oppressed and abused

03-08-2006, 11:37 AM	#1
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Utah case hinges on obscenity definition (March 8) Child pornography charges against a former Utah television weatherman and his business partner may hinge on whether photos the two men posted on the Internet of young girls in lingerie meet the federal definition of sexually explicit conduct. A defense attorney argues that as long as the children aren?t naked, the photographs aren?t sexually explicit. The rest of the story While this does not apply directly to us, because of the content the guys were using, it will be interesting to see how this does effect us. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-08-2006, 11:43 AM	#2
gornyhuy Chafed. Join Date: May 2002 Location: Face Down in Pussy Posts: 18,041	Eeeeeesh. __________________ icq:159548293

03-08-2006, 11:51 AM	#3
G-Rotica Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,258	Ugh. Blame porn. __________________

03-09-2006, 03:14 AM	#7
je_rome Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 6,846	i hope justice will not be delayed and denied by some technical definition of child pornography... though it is very important, the magistrates of law should never fail to protect the oppressed and abused __________________ Make money on any traffic. Join KlikRevenue.com Today!

03-08-2006, 11:57 AM	#4
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	The biggest problem in this is that at the end of the day, our industry gets tricked into having to support these dimwads because if they lose, the potential is that all of 2257 goes to shit because the definition of sexually explicit as a legal construct could be changed. All or nothing. Black or white. right or wrong. It's a new world order. Alex

03-08-2006, 12:04 PM	#5
GlydeGirl Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 1,516	These guys ARE exploiting the kids, but know the laws and are keeping to the letter of them, if not the spirit! And if this guy Duhamel lives in Bountiful, is he a Mormon? I could easily see how living in a Mormon community would allow these men access to numerous little girls -- heck they could even "marry" the girls at age 14. I think this is a case of a couple of sick fucks who are just a little too smart for their own good.

03-08-2006, 12:21 PM	#6
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	very creepy stuff and the parents where in on it yuck