![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Now with more Jayne
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40,077
|
Court rules against man in porn-at-work case
Court rules against man in porn-at-work case
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A Montana man who used his work computer to access child pornography does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy that would bar a search of the machine, a U.S. federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday. Jeffrey Ziegler had argued that his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures should prevent the government from using evidence that he had viewed many images of child pornography at work. The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals based in San Francisco cited similar past cases and found that even if some people lament the lack of privacy at work, the law was against Ziegler. "Social norms suggest that employees are not entitled to privacy in the use of workplace computers, which belong to their employers and pose significant dangers in terms of diminished productivity and even employer liability," Diarmuid O'Scannlain wrote for a three-judge panel. "Employer monitoring is largely an assumed practice, and thus we think a disseminated computer-use policy is entirely sufficient to defeat any expectation that an employee might nonetheless harbor." http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/...orn_privacy_dc |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
I love how people abuse the shit out of "privacy" to protect their criminal behavior, and the 9th curcuit always goes out of their way to rule in the criminal's favor. I'm glad they finally came to their senses on this one. Fuck his privacy. I hope he hangs. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
www.AdultCopywriters.com
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 31,618
|
Fcuking bastard should fry.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,707
|
There is no such thing as privacy when you use someone elses computer. Lock him up !!!
__________________
![]() SOLOGIRLPAYS.COM Very Hot Solo Girls now paying 50% sales,rebills and 10% webmaster referral. Free Hosted Galleries are ready to go !! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |