Iraq Death Toll: 655,000 People - GoFuckYourself.com

minusonebit · 10-11-2006, 06:39 PM

The death toll in Iraq following the US-led invasion has topped 655,000 - one in 40 of the entire population - according to a major piece of research in one of the world's leading medical journals.

The study, produced by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore and published online by the Lancet, claims the total number of deaths is more than 10 times greater than any previously compiled estimate.

The findings provoked an immediate political storm. Within hours of its release, George Bush had dismissed the figures. "I don't consider it a credible report," he told reporters at the White House. "Neither does General Casey [the top US officer in Iraq], neither do Iraqi officials."

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1920166,00.html

ThePope · 10-11-2006, 06:40 PM

ah fuckin men

minusonebit · 10-11-2006, 06:45 PM

And then... there is this little tidbit...

Army: Troops to Stay in Iraq Until 2010
By ROBERT BURNS , 10.11.2006, 06:28 PM

For planning purposes, the Army is gearing up to keep current troop levels in Iraq for another four years, a new indication that conditions there are too unstable to foresee an end to the war.

Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, cautioned against reading too much into the planning, which is done far in advance to prepare the right mix of combat units for expected deployments. He noted that it is easier to scale back later if conditions allow, than to ramp up if they don't.

http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/...ap3084628.html

10-11-2006, 06:39 PM	#1
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	Iraq Death Toll: 655,000 People The death toll in Iraq following the US-led invasion has topped 655,000 - one in 40 of the entire population - according to a major piece of research in one of the world's leading medical journals. The study, produced by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore and published online by the Lancet, claims the total number of deaths is more than 10 times greater than any previously compiled estimate. The findings provoked an immediate political storm. Within hours of its release, George Bush had dismissed the figures. "I don't consider it a credible report," he told reporters at the White House. "Neither does General Casey [the top US officer in Iraq], neither do Iraqi officials." > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1920166,00.html

10-11-2006, 06:40 PM	#2
ThePope So Fucking Banned Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vatcian City Posts: 59	ah fuckin men

10-11-2006, 06:45 PM	#3
minusonebit So Fucking Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: [email protected] Posts: 7,391	And then... there is this little tidbit... Army: Troops to Stay in Iraq Until 2010 By ROBERT BURNS , 10.11.2006, 06:28 PM For planning purposes, the Army is gearing up to keep current troop levels in Iraq for another four years, a new indication that conditions there are too unstable to foresee an end to the war. Gen. Peter Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff, cautioned against reading too much into the planning, which is done far in advance to prepare the right mix of combat units for expected deployments. He noted that it is easier to scale back later if conditions allow, than to ramp up if they don't. http://www.forbes.com/entrepreneurs/...ap3084628.html