9 months for killing sombody - WTF??? - GoFuckYourself.com

DeanCapture · 01-05-2007, 08:19 PM

Interesting short article about a guy who got only 9 months in prison for killing somebody. I don't really understand why this guy didn't get life or something more harsh than only 9 months. I mean he did kill somebody

Agent 488 · 01-05-2007, 08:22 PM

cuz the dude was an alleged child molester.

ukxtra · 01-05-2007, 08:25 PM

Quote:

an infuriated Fontanez punched Vasquez so hard that Vasquez went through the back door of his home

Fuck yeah!

Pleasurepays · 01-05-2007, 08:26 PM

because it was manslaughter.... not murder.

NemesiS876 · 01-05-2007, 08:27 PM

perhaps he had a good lawyer or something , but I steel do not agree whit that too

spacedog · 01-05-2007, 08:28 PM

I wouldv'e killed the fucker too if I we're in that same position.

Spunky · 01-05-2007, 08:30 PM

Fucking ridiculous..your life isn't worth shit according to some justice systems

DeanCapture · 01-05-2007, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

because it was manslaughter.... not murder.

I'm not a specialist in law but he beat the man to death and only got 9 months. Doesn't make sense to me...that's all I'm say'n

sicone · 01-05-2007, 08:35 PM

He was convicted of criminally negligent homicide, which basically saying he was blinded by the moment and not in his right mind when he committed the crime. A crime of passion.

If it was your child how would you react with the accused only inches from your face?

sicone · 01-05-2007, 08:36 PM

He was convicted of criminally negligent homicide, which basically saying he was blinded by the moment and not in his right mind when he committed the crime. A crime of passion.

If it was your child how would you react with the accused only inches from your face?

DeanCapture · 01-05-2007, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

If it was your child how would you react with the accused only inches from your face?

What does how I would react have to do with anything?

The fact that a man can beat another man to death and only get 9 months is damn fucked up in my eyes. We have a justice system for people who break the law and he took the law into his own hands and killed another human being. So it's ok to kill somebody (anybody) that might have molested a child even without any proof? Just walk over to their house and kill them?

Pleasurepays · 01-05-2007, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

I'm not a specialist in law but he beat the man to death and only got 9 months. Doesn't make sense to me...that's all I'm say'n

he hit a guy and the guy died as a result. there was no intent... no premeditation etc. basically the law sees it as an accidental death.

Pleasurepays · 01-05-2007, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

What does how I would react have to do with anything?

The fact that a man can beat another man to death and only get 9 months is damn fucked up in my eyes. We have a justice system for people who break the law and he took the law into his own hands and killed another human being. So it's ok to kill somebody (anybody) that might have molested a child even without any proof? Just walk over to their house and kill them?

again... he hit him. he didn't intend to kill him. had he hit him with intent to kill him it would be murder. had he taken some measures to plan the event out, it would be premeditated murder. he did 9 months because it was not intentional. you can do a lot of things to unintentionally kill someone... doesn't make it murder.

a guy killed my mother when i was 15, drunk driving, in the wrong lane, at night... with his headlights off... resulting in a fatal head on collision. he got 5 years and served two. the law does not see it as murder. simple as that.

Pleasurepays · 01-05-2007, 08:51 PM

actually.. it says in the story that he plead guilty to Criminally Negligent Homicide. Negligent homicide is when someone dies of the result of someones negligence - i.e. your child is sick... you decide that God will heal his burst appendix and refuse to take him for medical care and he dies. i would guess that criminally negligent homicide would be that you were breaking the law in the course of the death - i.e. illegally assualting the person that resulted in their death.... with the death being unintentional.

shekinah · 01-05-2007, 08:54 PM

Maybe his lawyer is just genius to get him out of hell

scottybuzz · 01-05-2007, 08:56 PM

manslaughter. i know someone who got realeased after 2 years.

Agent 488 · 01-05-2007, 08:58 PM

sicone · 01-05-2007, 09:17 PM

Anyone remember the Ellie Nessler case?

She shot the accused abuser of her son in the court room and barely did anytime and in fact was treated as a hero.

Her planning to sneak a gun into a courtroom and shoot this man was a clear case of 1st degree murder.

This man, hearing his daughter say 'he molested me' and the accused standing right there, he, most likely in a blind rage swung.

do you see the difference?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

What does how I would react have to do with anything?

How you react has everything to do with it, he was pissed, blinded by rage and started swinging.

Webby · 01-05-2007, 09:45 PM

He was charged with second-degree murder and did a plea on negligent homicide. It would appear the prosecution were satisfied with his plea?

There are probably more factors underneath - ie any existing rap sheets blah and how convincing the story unfolded in court etc. Who knows what the history of the victim was - he could be totally innocent or a raving pedo. Either way, the defendant has no right to kill him, tho the court obviously believed the defendant never intended to cause death.

But... he's lucky to get off with a very low sentence.

Remember one guy who was convicted for murdering his wife - he ended up serving only 15 ish months (and had to report regularly for a few years after). Apparently the court accepted his wife was a total nag and made his life intolerable

to the point of tipping him over the edge. Again, suppose it's all in the detail and what the court knows of the background in making their assessments.

01-05-2007, 08:19 PM	#1
DeanCapture Haters & Trolls SUCK! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 9,275	9 months for killing sombody - WTF??? Interesting short article about a guy who got only 9 months in prison for killing somebody. I don't really understand why this guy didn't get life or something more harsh than only 9 months. I mean he did kill somebody __________________ Twitter: @DeanCapture Instagram: @TheDeanCapture DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

01-05-2007, 08:30 PM	#7
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,940	Fucking ridiculous..your life isn't worth shit according to some justice systems __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

01-05-2007, 08:35 PM	#9
sicone Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sac Posts: 18,453	He was convicted of criminally negligent homicide, which basically saying he was blinded by the moment and not in his right mind when he committed the crime. A crime of passion. If it was your child how would you react with the accused only inches from your face? __________________

01-05-2007, 08:36 PM	#10
sicone Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sac Posts: 18,453	He was convicted of criminally negligent homicide, which basically saying he was blinded by the moment and not in his right mind when he committed the crime. A crime of passion. If it was your child how would you react with the accused only inches from your face? __________________

01-05-2007, 08:54 PM	#15
shekinah Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 8,452	Maybe his lawyer is just genius to get him out of hell __________________ [Web Design \| Development \| Programming \| Content Writing ] ICQ: 238-890-469

01-05-2007, 08:22 PM	#2
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	cuz the dude was an alleged child molester.

01-05-2007, 08:26 PM	#4
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	because it was manslaughter.... not murder.

01-05-2007, 08:27 PM	#5
NemesiS876 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 7,436	perhaps he had a good lawyer or something , but I steel do not agree whit that too

01-05-2007, 08:28 PM	#6
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	I wouldv'e killed the fucker too if I we're in that same position.

01-05-2007, 08:51 PM	#14
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	actually.. it says in the story that he plead guilty to Criminally Negligent Homicide. Negligent homicide is when someone dies of the result of someones negligence - i.e. your child is sick... you decide that God will heal his burst appendix and refuse to take him for medical care and he dies. i would guess that criminally negligent homicide would be that you were breaking the law in the course of the death - i.e. illegally assualting the person that resulted in their death.... with the death being unintentional.

01-05-2007, 08:56 PM	#16
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	manslaughter. i know someone who got realeased after 2 years. __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

01-05-2007, 08:58 PM	#17
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511

01-05-2007, 09:45 PM	#19
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	He was charged with second-degree murder and did a plea on negligent homicide. It would appear the prosecution were satisfied with his plea? There are probably more factors underneath - ie any existing rap sheets blah and how convincing the story unfolded in court etc. Who knows what the history of the victim was - he could be totally innocent or a raving pedo. Either way, the defendant has no right to kill him, tho the court obviously believed the defendant never intended to cause death. But... he's lucky to get off with a very low sentence. Remember one guy who was convicted for murdering his wife - he ended up serving only 15 ish months (and had to report regularly for a few years after). Apparently the court accepted his wife was a total nag and made his life intolerable to the point of tipping him over the edge. Again, suppose it's all in the detail and what the court knows of the background in making their assessments. __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat. Last edited by Webby; 01-05-2007 at 09:47 PM..