Fucking Muslims

[Barefootsies]

I'm getting sick of this fucking bullshit, and I am sure others are as well. Muslim's do not allow Catholics, Jews, or other denominations in their Mosques. They are so rigid in some of their religious beliefs that they are pretty intolerant of anything in their own countries for other cultures, and religions.

Now they want to swear into Congress on the Koran instead of the Bible.

They want the Muslims to be able to go into the Cathedral, and asking the Pope to allow it because it USED to be a Mosque.

So let me get this straight... you want other religions, countries, and cultures to respect your faith and intolerance. But if someone of another country, religion, belief was in their Muslim countries they would be jailed, beaten, or something worse??!?

Give me a fucking break!

This goes hand in hand with immigrants in this country who think we hate them because they are a different skin color, race, or religon.

It isn't.

You are in the United States (while this applies to any other country as well), you are expected to conform to the "melting pot". You are to speak English, and learn the ways of our culture, and society.

People give you dirty looks because you don't. No more. No less.

If we, Americans, went to Mexico. Would they change their whole culture to allow for English? Print everything in Spanish and English for the gringos? Hardly.

Get fucking real.

[who]

[just a punk]

Religious discrimination? Is that allowed in the USA now?

Sig. spot.

[donnie]

let me guess... You never finished high school?

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by donnie

let me guess... You never finished high school?

[polish_aristocrat]

shit this thread got me confused with I never fucked a Muslim girl from someone else

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat

shit this thread got me confused with I never fucked a Muslim girl from someone else

[v4 media]

Hmm. The english Queen went to a mosque once, cause she wore funny socks, sh'e not a muslim..

If someone's a muslim they should swear on their book, Give a jew the new testament to swear on, they wont.

As with the catherderal, are you talking about La Mezquita in Cordoba?
It was a mosque the Catholics stole it. So seems fair they can go in it.

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by v4 media

Hmm. The english Queen went to a mosque once, cause she wore funny socks, sh'e not a muslim..

Interesting.

Originally Posted by v4 media

If someone's a muslim they should swear on their book, Give a jew the new testament to swear on, they wont.

Out of respect, they should conform to the nation's culture for which they are located. Just as they would expect us to do in their country.

Originally Posted by v4 media

As with the catherderal, are you talking about La Mezquita in Cordoba?
It was a mosque the Catholics stole it. So seems fair they can go in it.

That can be said for Palestine, the Ottoman's, and any number of places across the globe. The fact is that Muslim's would not allow Catholics the same right in reverse.

[borked]

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by borked

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by donnie

let me guess... You never finished high school?

Correct

P.S. Wow, a free sig. spot again!

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by cyberxxx

Correct

P.S. Wow, a free sig. spot again!

[Cash]

Sig spot for this drama ...

[KingK7]

Muslims sux

[Johny Traffic]

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Now they want to swear into Congress on the Koran instead of the Bible.

Wouldnt you prefere for them to swear on a book that meens something to them, instead of a book that doesnt?

Do you actualy even know why people swear on the bible and what that symbolises?

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by Johny Traffic

Wouldnt you prefere for them to swear on a book that meens something to them, instead of a book that doesnt?

Do you actualy even know why people swear on the bible and what that symbolises?

Where to begin.. Ah yes..

place their hand on a Bible and conclude their oaths with the words "so help me God."

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of (fill in the blank) of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Next..

[womfalcs7]

If you're pissed about Ellison swearing in on the Quran...then you're against the US Constitution.

[just a punk]

Originally Posted by womfalcs7

If you're pissed about Ellison swearing in on the Quran...then you're against the US Constitution.

Seems "you never finished high school" just like me in this case

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by womfalcs7

If you're pissed about Ellison swearing in on the Quran...then you're against the US Constitution.

When Presidents and other federal officials take their oaths of office, they often place their hand on a Bible and conclude their oaths with the words "so help me God." Some accommodationists see these practices as evidence that the founders never intended separation of church and state. But this conclusion doesn't follow: the Constitution doesn't require Presidents or other federal officials to place their hand on the Bible or say the words "so help me God." Quite the contrary, those sections of the Constitution that deal with oaths of office are completely secular in content and, as such, constitute evidence that the framers intended separation.

Oathtaking is not rocket science. If the framers wanted Presidents to invoke God when taking the oath of office they could have worded the oath to accomplish that objective. Instead, the constitutional oath of office contains no reference to God, need not be administered on the Bible, and need not even be considered an oath. Contrary to the accommodationist argument, Article II, section 1 is evidence that the framers intended the federal government to be secular in its operation.

[womfalcs7]

The actual swearing-in process is done with no Book as the Constitution states. It's the photo-op swearing in that involves the Book, and the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion.

[LiveDose]

Originally Posted by borked

You made my day with that pic! LOL

[Phoenix]

drama llama?

[womfalcs7]

Originally Posted by LiveDose

You made my day with that pic! LOL

It's funny, but you can make fun of any culture. Including ours.

[Barefootsies]

The contemporary idea of religious freedom as a human right remains a contested topic. The major areas of debate are listed below.

[edit] Islam

Islamic theologians, for instance, quote the Quran (Verse 2:256) "There is no compulsion in religion" to show Islam's support for religious freedom. Thus, conversion to Islam has to be strictly a matter of personal choice. Saudi Arabia, that holds the sacred sites of Mecca and Medina, does not allow public practice of religions other than Islam.

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by womfalcs7

It's funny, but you can make fun of any culture. Including ours.

That's covered in the Constitution as well. I believe it's called, "Freedom of Speech".

[Lazonby]

Originally Posted by v4 media

Hmm. The english Queen went to a mosque once, cause she wore funny socks, sh'e not a muslim..

If someone's a muslim they should swear on their book, Give a jew the new testament to swear on, they wont.

As with the catherderal, are you talking about La Mezquita in Cordoba?
It was a mosque the Catholics stole it. So seems fair they can go in it.

Rofl. How uneducated.

[Lazonby]

So, if I were to create a religion/ ideology which contained the following:

?Muslims are the vilest of animals??
?Show mercy to one another, but be ruthless to Muslims?
?How perverse are Muslims!?
?Strike off the heads of Muslims, as well as their fingertips?
?Fight those Muslims who are near to you?
?Muslim mischief makers should be murdered or crucified?

..would anyone here have a problem with it? And if so, why?

[womfalcs7]

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

That's covered in the Constitution as well. I believe it's called, "Freedom of Speech".

I never said posting the picture was wrong.

[Barefootsies]

Seen something on the TV the other day about muslim cab drivers refusing to let people into their cabs with any type of alcohol (even unopened stuff they are just bringing home) because it is against their religion. Stupid fuckers should all be fired.

[womfalcs7]

Originally Posted by evildick

Seen something on the TV the other day about muslim cab drivers refusing to let people into their cabs with any type of alcohol (even unopened stuff they are just bringing home) because it is against their religion. Stupid fuckers should all be fired.

So you don't like them because they have morals?

[E$_manager]

"In Rome do as Romans do".
You are right.

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by evildick

Seen something on the TV the other day about muslim cab drivers refusing to let people into their cabs with any type of alcohol (even unopened stuff they are just bringing home) because it is against their religion. Stupid fuckers should all be fired.

Yeah. That was in Minnesota at one of the airports.

It all had to do with alcohol, and dogs I believe. The cabby's would not provide cabs to people who have either.

Originally Posted by womfalcs7

So you don't like them because they have morals?

No, I don't like them because they are trying to impose their religious beliefs onto other people in their place of work. They know what is involved in their line of work. If they don't like it, get another job. They don't own the cab service, they are employees, so they don't get to make the rules.

[ragnar69]

Something To Think About

Proud!!

You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction and
you call me "Whiteboy," "Cracker," "Honkey," "Whitey," "Caveman" and that's OK.
But when I call you, hahahahahaha, Towelhead, Sand-hahahahahaha, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink you call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund.
You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month.
You have Cesar Chavez Day.
You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi
You have the NAACP.
You have BET.
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we'd be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day you would call us racists.
If we had white history month, we'd be racists.
If we had an organization for only whites to "advance" our lives, we'd be racists.
If we had a college fund that only gave white students
scholarships, you know we'd be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US, yet if there were "White colleges" that would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.
I am proud. But, you call me a racist.

WHY IS IT THAT ONLY WHITES CAN BE RACISTS????

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by evildick

No, I don't like them because they are trying to impose their religious beliefs onto other people in their place of work. They know what is involved in their line of work. If they don't like it, get another job. They don't own the cab service, they are employees, so they don't get to make the rules.

And depending on how far the people in the state want to take it... cabbies are licensed by the state. Since there is a seperation OF church and state, and means those Muslim's can either do their job, quit, or pound it up their fucking ass.

This is not Tehran.

[E$_manager]

Originally Posted by evildick

Seen something on the TV the other day about muslim cab drivers refusing to let people into their cabs with any type of alcohol (even unopened stuff they are just bringing home) because it is against their religion. Stupid fuckers should all be fired.

In EU they don't let you in with alcohol without any morals. Just precaution.

[Splum]

Shocking video proof of Muslim intolerance
http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/693650-shocking-brutality-innocent-muslims-video.html
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=693650

[v4 media]

Originally Posted by Lazonby

Rofl. How uneducated.

Explain yourself, fool..

[4Man]

Youre my man

[Fabien]

I'm tired of all their B.S. too ! In fact, anykind of fucking religions pisse me off. Can't stand it anymore.

Religious people = dumb fucks period

[borked]

Originally Posted by Fabien

Religious people = dumb fucks period

Religious leaders = the most dangerous people on Earth

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

So let me get this straight... you want other religions, countries, and cultures to respect your faith and intolerance. But if someone of another country, religion, belief was in their Muslim countries they would be jailed, beaten, or something

now yer getting the picture all right have you noticed that muslims attack and start wars/mass murder etc on every religious holiday the other team has, then cry like babies if any one does anything to them on their 'holy days'?

[notabook]

I hear Muhammed has to consume the flesh of people in order to keep his youth.

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by Wanton

now yer getting the picture all right have you noticed that muslims attack and start wars/mass murder etc on every religious holiday the other team has, then cry like babies if any one does anything to them on their 'holy days'?

Wha wha wha?!!?... SAY IT AIN'T SO!!

[Barefootsies]

Originally Posted by pornopete

Lets kill some turks! It will be fun!

[Sarah_Jayne]

bigger question to me is why with separation of church and state anyone is swearing on any holy book in the seat of government

[borked]

Originally Posted by sarah_webinc

bigger question to me is why with separation of church and state anyone is swearing on any holy book in the seat of government

bah humbug - that's just jefferson-speak.
Look at Britain: the Queen is the head of the government and chooses her PM to govern her land, and at the same time she is the head of the CoE.

It's all about spinning the bottle at the right time

[Sarah_Jayne]

Originally Posted by borked

bah humbug - that's just jefferson-speak.
Look at Britain: the Queen is the head of the government and chooses her PM to govern her land, and at the same time she is the head of the CoE.

It's all about spinning the bottle at the right time

yes, but the UK doesn't have separation of church and state