U.S. judge blocks 1998 online porn law - GoFuckYourself.com

The Dawg · 03-22-2007, 09:34 AM

PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge on Thursday dealt another blow to government efforts to control Internet pornography, striking down a 1998 U.S. law that makes it a crime for commercial Web site operators to let children access "harmful" material.

In the ruling, the judge said parents can protect their children through software filters and other less restrictive means that do not limit the rights of others to free speech.

"Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection," wrote Senior U.S. District Judge Lowell Reed Jr., who presided over a four-week trial last fall.

Read More

pornguy · 03-22-2007, 09:36 AM

He will be removed from the bench within three months.

Voodoo · 03-22-2007, 09:39 AM

One small step for porn, one giant leap for pornkind.

Sarah_Jayne · 03-22-2007, 09:43 AM

would be nice to think it was setting a pattern for the future

Shoehorn! · 03-22-2007, 09:44 AM

Finally someone with some fucking sense.

uno · 03-22-2007, 09:48 AM

Parental accountability? In this day and age?

jacked · 03-22-2007, 09:54 AM

knowing whats on the internet it's got to be both parties the parents and the website owners working to keep children from viewing adult content. with all the shit that happens on mainstream sites and videos that are out there i'd be more worried about that kind of shit. hell if i had a child who was old enough to be able to surf the web i'd be standing over his/her shoulder the entire time they were online. none of that computer in there room type shit, you put the computer in a central location such a living room or den so that when the child is on the computer you can monitor what they are doing.

either way one big step for us more responsibility needs to be placed on the parent to protect their children, you either don't let your child use the internet unsupervised or you pay for a filtering software to block sites that you don't want your children viewing.

germ · 03-22-2007, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dawg

"Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection," wrote Senior U.S. District Judge Lowell Reed Jr., who presided over a four-week trial last fall.

Read More

good quote

12clicks · 03-22-2007, 10:05 AM

its about time someone struck a blow to the clinton/democratic dictatorship that attempted to harm our business.

Drake · 03-22-2007, 10:08 AM

Great news for once

jesse_adultdatingdollars · 03-22-2007, 10:45 AM

Free Speech Rules

SinisterStudios · 03-22-2007, 10:53 AM

I guess Bush will fire him now, too

mardigras · 03-23-2007, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

its about time someone struck a blow to the clinton/democratic dictatorship that attempted to harm our business.

You're a funny guy.

Sponsor of COPA: Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio)

Senate Majority Leader in 1998: Trent Lott (R-Mississippi)

House Speaker in 1998 Newt Gingrich (R-Georgia)

Jenny S. · 03-23-2007, 08:32 AM

There was a similar thread yesterday

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=717098

I guess we can always blame it on Carter.

Murderous · 03-23-2007, 08:33 AM

That article just reached our local paper, heh. Sounds good for me, being a Pa. resident and all.

mardigras · 03-23-2007, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jenny S.

There was a similar thread yesterday

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=717098

I guess we can always blame it on Carter.

Place the blame where it belongs, the Republican's "Contract on (oops, I mean with) America"...

12clicks · 03-24-2007, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

You're a funny guy.

Sponsor of COPA: Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio)

Senate Majority Leader in 1998: Trent Lott (R-Mississippi)

House Speaker in 1998 Newt Gingrich (R-Georgia)

signed into law: Bill Clinton (D-Arkansas)

Defended in Court: Janet Reno (D-Florida)

mardigras · 03-24-2007, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

signed into law: Bill Clinton (D-Arkansas)

Only signed into law by Clinton because there was not going to be a budget without it...

Quote:

During last-minute budget negotiations, the Clinton Administration reportedly objected to provisions of the bill pushed by Rep. Michael Oxley, R-OH, citing a Justice Department analysis that it was probably unconstitutional and would likely draw resources away from more important law enforcement efforts. But negotiators apparently failed to strike the Oxley language from the $500 billion Omnibus Appropriations measure due to be voted on in both the House and Senate and signed by the President tomorrow.

http://www.epic.org/free_speech/cens..._10_15_98.html

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Defended in Court: Janet Reno (D-Florida)

It's the job of the AG to defend laws whether they personally agree with them or not.

VicD · 03-24-2007, 08:03 AM

Hehe, that sounds good to me

GITZINGER · 03-24-2007, 08:11 AM

12clicks got POWN3D!!!! courtesy of Mardigras.

King Adam · 03-24-2007, 08:45 AM

It would be nice to see a pattern form here.

s9ann0 · 03-24-2007, 08:48 AM

lets hope .xxx goes the same way

spacedog · 03-24-2007, 09:04 AM

Irregardless that the law won't hold us accountable, I still believe one should take voluntary measures of protection as an ethical business practice.

It's your choice, but if you choose to do so voluntarily, RTA will enable your site to be filtered & could ensure that this option remains voluntary if enough people utilize it.

Place this single line of code in your meta tags & that's it.

http://www.rtalabel.org/

tranza · 03-24-2007, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voodoo

One small step for porn, one giant leap for pornkind.

Lol.....

03-22-2007, 09:34 AM	#1
The Dawg Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: State Of Bliss Posts: 2,438	U.S. judge blocks 1998 online porn law PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge on Thursday dealt another blow to government efforts to control Internet pornography, striking down a 1998 U.S. law that makes it a crime for commercial Web site operators to let children access "harmful" material. In the ruling, the judge said parents can protect their children through software filters and other less restrictive means that do not limit the rights of others to free speech. "Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection," wrote Senior U.S. District Judge Lowell Reed Jr., who presided over a four-week trial last fall. Read More

03-22-2007, 09:36 AM	#2
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	He will be removed from the bench within three months. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-22-2007, 09:44 AM	#5
Shoehorn! Die With Your Boots On Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Hawaii Posts: 22,872	Finally someone with some fucking sense. __________________

03-22-2007, 09:48 AM	#6
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	Parental accountability? In this day and age? __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

03-22-2007, 09:54 AM	#7
jacked sperm tail Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: nj Posts: 11,019	knowing whats on the internet it's got to be both parties the parents and the website owners working to keep children from viewing adult content. with all the shit that happens on mainstream sites and videos that are out there i'd be more worried about that kind of shit. hell if i had a child who was old enough to be able to surf the web i'd be standing over his/her shoulder the entire time they were online. none of that computer in there room type shit, you put the computer in a central location such a living room or den so that when the child is on the computer you can monitor what they are doing. either way one big step for us more responsibility needs to be placed on the parent to protect their children, you either don't let your child use the internet unsupervised or you pay for a filtering software to block sites that you don't want your children viewing. __________________ Got Cam Models? icq: 361-607-616

03-22-2007, 09:39 AM	#3
Voodoo ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 10,592	One small step for porn, one giant leap for pornkind.

03-22-2007, 09:43 AM	#4
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	would be nice to think it was setting a pattern for the future

03-22-2007, 10:05 AM	#9
12clicks Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: God's right hand Posts: 19,788	its about time someone struck a blow to the clinton/democratic dictatorship that attempted to harm our business. __________________ I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.

03-22-2007, 10:08 AM	#10
Drake Hello world! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 12,508	Great news for once

03-22-2007, 10:45 AM	#11
jesse_adultdatingdollars Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: San Diego Posts: 2,197	Free Speech Rules __________________ Got Dating Traffic? Contact: Jesse (at) adultdatingdollars.com ICQ: 296775809 or AIM: cabotime21

03-22-2007, 10:53 AM	#12
SinisterStudios Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: New Joisey Posts: 3,087	I guess Bush will fire him now, too __________________ SEOIP.com Multiple IP Webhosting Shared and Dedicated IP's - Multiple Class A's - From $1.99/ip

03-23-2007, 08:32 AM	#14
Jenny S. Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Europe and SE US Posts: 582	There was a similar thread yesterday http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=717098 I guess we can always blame it on Carter. __________________ Jenny Seemore Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment

03-23-2007, 08:33 AM	#15
Murderous Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Pennsylvania Posts: 3,938	That article just reached our local paper, heh. Sounds good for me, being a Pa. resident and all.

03-24-2007, 08:03 AM	#19
VicD ICQ: 304-611-162 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Masterdam Posts: 13,245	Hehe, that sounds good to me

03-24-2007, 08:11 AM	#20
GITZINGER Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: up your sisters ass Posts: 929	12clicks got POWN3D!!!! courtesy of Mardigras. __________________ Your momma was a ho!!!

03-24-2007, 08:45 AM	#21
King Adam Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Valley of the Sun Posts: 5,408	It would be nice to see a pattern form here. __________________ TWISTYSCASH.com - Proven to be One of the BEST Adult Programs Around Promote These Sites : Twistys ~ Busty Ones ~ Nicole Graves ICQ : 9 6 4 4 0 2 2 1

03-24-2007, 08:48 AM	#22
s9ann0 Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Boston Posts: 4,873	lets hope .xxx goes the same way

03-24-2007, 09:04 AM	#23
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	Irregardless that the law won't hold us accountable, I still believe one should take voluntary measures of protection as an ethical business practice. It's your choice, but if you choose to do so voluntarily, RTA will enable your site to be filtered & could ensure that this option remains voluntary if enough people utilize it. Place this single line of code in your meta tags & that's it. http://www.rtalabel.org/