little lupe = child porn.

[blackhatter]

Dont contact me to run a campaign on that shit idiots.

[xclusive]

well been nice knowing ya, I predict a banning soon.

[xclusive]

oh and I won't push it either but it's not CP

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

I am talking bets on how long it will take before the hammer strikes....

[SomeCreep]

[starpimps]

Originally Posted by SomeCreep

lol dude that pic is golden....i say by 4am tomorrow he will be banned

[xclusive]

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

I am talking bets on how long it will take before the hammer strikes....

It's easter so he might last up to an hour or so.

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Originally Posted by xclusive

It's easter so he might last up to an hour or so.

I am thinking 3 hrs, 23 min. and 52 sec.

[xclusive]

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

I am thinking 11 hrs, 23 min. and 52 sec.

If this was the price is right you would be fucked, That's way over.

[blackhatter]

yea ban me please.

[BusterBunny]

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

I am thinking 3 hrs, 23 min. and 52 sec.

td didnt post on christmas so the bannings didnt happen til the day after so it might actually last a full day

[blackhatter]

by the way its littlelupe.com

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Originally Posted by BusterBunny

td didnt post on christmas so the bannings didnt happen til the day after so it might actually last a full day

You could be right

[blackhatter]

why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Originally Posted by blackhatter

by the way its littlelupe.com

We all know the url and most of us do not agree with the look and feel of the site, but either way she is of age

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Originally Posted by blackhatter

why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.

Because you called out something as something it is not

[DamageX]

Originally Posted by Jon Clark

We all know the url and most of us do not agree with the look and feel of the site, but either way she is of age

We all do know who the site caters to though.

[xclusive]

Originally Posted by blackhatter

why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.

Because she's not under 18 I can assure you that and that will get you banned for calling it CP, That's a very serious accusation. I'm not a fan of programs doing the whole ponytail thing and girls looking really young. But it's legal.

[Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE]

Originally Posted by DamageX

We all do know who the site caters to though.

Yup we do and that is why most of us stay away from it...

[blackhatter]

the devil will find you.

[After Shock Media]

Originally Posted by blackhatter

why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.

Umm maybe cause you said it was CP without any proof. Just like calling someone a pedo without proof.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by blackhatter

why would I get banned, someone hit me up hiring me to promote that site, and I have that shit in my icq logs now.

because she is over 18, hence you have made unfounded allegations of CP = banning

[Splum]

Yeah just like the last guy who called someone a pedo on here got banned.

Originally Posted by GatorB

Yes you are stupid. You keep trying to justify your pedophilia.

[blackhatter]

Lmfao At You Clowns!

[blackhatter]

BAN HIM! BAN HIM! hahaha but I was almost at 300 posts!

[goldmine]

For the record: Site is 2257 compliant... girl is 18 bla bla

Off the record: I really "looks like" girl is under 18...



















***DISCLAIMER: Me not accusing anyone in anyhow engaging in CP.. ;)

[bdld]

1. i'm sure she's over age, they wouldn't dare do anything that dumb.
2. i wouldnt promote it just because she looks way too young

[VicD]

i checked a gallery of her and she sure looks very young but on the other hand it looks all legal to me...

[Kimo]

Originally Posted by bdld

1. i'm sure she's over age, they wouldn't dare do anything that dumb.
2. i wouldnt promote it just because she looks way too young

quoted for truth

[Scootermuze]

§ 2256. Definitions for chapter

(8) (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; ....

(11) the term ?indistinguishable? used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
-----------------------------

This being the case, it could be considered cp if the powers that be decided to make it such.. I'd say a rather large gray area in this particular situation..

[Ace_luffy]

[Barefootsies]

[Barefootsies]

[Barefootsies]

[Barefootsies]

[webmasterchecks]

no reason to ban him

that group has a history of finding girls that look young as fuck. i can imagine the celebration that would go on in those offices if they found a 10 year old look alike

now, im sure they have their ducks in a row with this girl, but dont tell me she clearly looks over 18. she doesnt't, and she is not intended to

[fuzebox]

She looks like a skinny 18 year old latina to me, not much different than a lot of them here... Maybe a little young, but not enough to warrant this thread.

Are you guys really influenced that much by the pink hair bows and shit?

[tony286]

Originally Posted by THEMASKEDRIDER

no reason to ban him

that group has a history of finding girls that look young as fuck. i can imagine the celebration that would go on in those offices if they found a 10 year old look alike

now, im sure they have their ducks in a row with this girl, but dont tell me she clearly looks over 18. she doesnt't, and she is not intended to

their 2257 statement is not in compliance so not a good start lol

[Paolo]

She is 20 years old and a porn star in spain
She has done 2 features and her boyfriend shot all of the video.
She made the deal and made lots of cash for herself.

Come on now. That is a serious charge and you should be banned.

[s9ann0]

hey she may look 13 but its ok because the release says shes over 18

[DaddyHalbucks]

Since the title of the thread is factually inaccurate and potentially defamatory, AKA totally false, and violates GFY rules, I would say a ban is justified.

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

§ 2256. Definitions for chapter

(8) (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; ....

(11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
-----------------------------

This being the case, it could be considered cp if the powers that be decided to make it such.. I'd say a rather large gray area in this particular situation..

Good try, but don't quit your day job to be a lawyer - you quoted the stuff without context:

(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

The entirety of section 8B and C is to cover machine generated / photochop style porn.

Good try thought, but you need to work on those critical reading skills.

[digifan]

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

[Evil Chris]

Slanderous allegations such as these should most definitely bring a ban to the person who started this thread. Unfortunately, the person has a low post count which to me is indicative of someone using a 2nd GFY account.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=722195

I'm asking Lensman to take a close look at the IPs this person is using and has used in the past, and to kindly ban all nicknames associated with it.

Thank you very much.

[Screaming]

oo its a teenrevenue site.

Not shocking in the least.

[Eric]

Accusations of CP with out proof is against GFY rules. You are Banned

[RawAlex]

So fucking banned.

[JFK]

Originally Posted by baddog

because she is over 18, hence you have made unfounded allegations of CP = banning

YUP..... have a nice life in the hole

[Kram]

Its obvious who they are catering for ...

[CaptainHowdy]

Hasta la vista, blackhatter