|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
04-29-2007, 01:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
Disruptive Innovator
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vegas
Posts: 4,230
|
2257 Question
Soo.. It's probably been answered before and I'm just too lazy to search.
Has it been decided if you're allowed (legally in the U.S) to have static links to web sites containing nudity without having to have any 2257 documentation? The page with the static link to nudity will not have any nudity simulated or otherwise. Also, what about Iframing a page with nudity? thanks 
__________________
C:\Code\ C:\Code\Run\ |
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 01:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
|
2257 requires you have documentation for anyone portrayed in sexually-explicit content hosted on YOUR SITE... Why would you be held responsible for images/content on other people's sites?
__________________
Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life |
|
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 01:42 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Disruptive Innovator
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vegas
Posts: 4,230
|
Quote:
no clue .. someone wanted me to ask so I did. However, I did throw in the I-Frame part tho because of secondary publisher shit.
__________________
C:\Code\ C:\Code\Run\ |
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 01:50 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Too old to care
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 03:09 PM
|
#5 |
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: At My Desk
Posts: 2,904
|
So Paul, say I link a advertisement (for example let's use a picture of the day image) on my web site......
Now the picture is actually being hosting by you but its linked and fully displayed in my home page index.html US Webmaster is ok? |
|
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 03:27 PM
|
#6 |
|
.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 13,076
|
If the image is displayed on your site then I don't think it matters where it is hosted. You still need the 2257 for it if you have control over the content...
__________________
Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life |
|
|
|
|
04-29-2007, 03:36 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Far far away - as possible
Posts: 14,956
|
Quote:
There may be minor exceptions, but generally as a webmaster, you are responsible for all content published on your website.
__________________
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat. |
|
|
|
|
