Check out version 6 of this site. - GoFuckYourself.com

Sexxxy Sites · 07-03-2007, 07:06 PM

I have changed the colors since version five due to requests to do so.

Since version four I have removed the graphics to decrease load time and bandwidth. I have reduced the size of the data bases to reduce search time. It is generally between one to two seconds now.

I have changed the video format from version four and I believe I have the largest database for streaming porn videos on the net, as well as file sharing links, but I may be wrong.

Zuzana Designs · 07-03-2007, 07:07 PM

hmmm I don't see a site ???

Sexxxy Sites · 07-03-2007, 07:10 PM

Ooops!

http://www.1stwr.com/pmembers-1/

Sexxxy Sites · 07-03-2007, 09:07 PM

Not much of a response so will try again.

jact · 07-03-2007, 09:09 PM

I opened the site, I said (out loud) "GAK" and closed my browser as quickly as I could. You realize 1994 was a long time ago, right?

Nails · 07-03-2007, 09:13 PM

I see you made your site as shitty looking as thehun, it should do well

RawAlex · 07-03-2007, 09:14 PM

I agree with Jact. 1994 wants their site design back.

Sexxxy Sites · 07-03-2007, 11:11 PM

When I removed the graphics I intentionally made the site as simple as possible to reduce load time and bandwidth, thus it serves its purpose well, don't you think. Besides it is known that design plays but a small role in the popularity of a site.

The primary factors are content, load time, and ease of navigation and this site has all that is listed.

jact · 07-03-2007, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites

When I removed the graphics I intentionally made the site as simple as possible to reduce load time and bandwidth, thus it serves its purpose well, don't you think. Besides it is known that design plays but a small role in the popularity of a site.

The primary factors are content, load time, and ease of navigation and this site has all that is listed.

You can do simple without doing ugly.

kirupai · 07-03-2007, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites

When I removed the graphics I intentionally made the site as simple as possible to reduce load time and bandwidth, thus it serves its purpose well, don't you think. Besides it is known that design plays but a small role in the popularity of a site.

The primary factors are content, load time, and ease of navigation and this site has all that is listed.

Navigation can be confusing, load time is good but what to expect from such a simple design. Look at http://www.cssbeauty.com/cgi-bin/mt/tags.cgi?tags=clean on how to create a simple yet beautiful site.

pornask · 07-03-2007, 11:19 PM

It's nopt as bad when you get past first 2 pages.

It's true that you don't need mind blowing design to have a successful site, but you still want to keep ellegance in mind as surfers could really leave rigth after seeing first page. I have an example of a simple site which seems to have a little better layout and design. Maybe it'll help you with ideas ;) --> Satan's Cock

Sexxxy Sites · 07-03-2007, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kirupai

Navigation can be confusing, load time is good but what to expect from such a simple design. Look at http://www.cssbeauty.com/cgi-bin/mt/tags.cgi?tags=clean on how to create a simple yet beautiful site.

In what way is the navigation confusing? I personally do not see how it can be made any simpler. BTW, I personally do not find that site to be beautiful, but all is in the eye of the beholder.

kirupai · 07-03-2007, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites

In what way is the navigation confusing? I personally do not see how it can be made any simpler. BTW, I personally do not find that site to be beautiful, but all is in the eye of the beholder.

Look at the examples on cssbeauty for examples of clean designs that are more easy on the eye that the one you already have.

The navigation links dont pop, they blend to much with the content. When you click on a link, you dont get any results making it look like the area of the site is empty. Why not list the latest added links?

http://www.1stwr.com/pmembers-1/porn...deos/index.htm

Waaay to much text, I havent even read it at all and Im trying to explain how to improve your site. What makes you think a surfer will go thru the trouble of reading all of that when they can just close your site and move on to another one? Make it simple, after-all. Isn't that what you are trying to achieve?

Enough pointers for now.

07-03-2007, 07:06 PM	#1
Sexxxy Sites Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 851	Check out version 6 of this site. I have changed the colors since version five due to requests to do so. Since version four I have removed the graphics to decrease load time and bandwidth. I have reduced the size of the data bases to reduce search time. It is generally between one to two seconds now. I have changed the video format from version four and I believe I have the largest database for streaming porn videos on the net, as well as file sharing links, but I may be wrong.

07-03-2007, 07:07 PM	#2
Zuzana Designs All Your Design Needs Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: [email protected] Posts: 20,847	hmmm I don't see a site ??? __________________ Website Design - Consulting - Development sarah [at] zuzanadesigns.com - See Our Work

07-03-2007, 09:09 PM	#5
jact Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Canada Posts: 9,134	I opened the site, I said (out loud) "GAK" and closed my browser as quickly as I could. You realize 1994 was a long time ago, right? __________________ Free agent

07-03-2007, 07:10 PM	#3
Sexxxy Sites Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 851	Ooops! http://www.1stwr.com/pmembers-1/

07-03-2007, 09:07 PM	#4
Sexxxy Sites Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 851	Not much of a response so will try again.

07-03-2007, 09:13 PM	#6
Nails Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 262	I see you made your site as shitty looking as thehun, it should do well

07-03-2007, 09:14 PM	#7
RawAlex So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In a house. Posts: 9,465	I agree with Jact. 1994 wants their site design back.

07-03-2007, 11:11 PM	#8
Sexxxy Sites Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 851	When I removed the graphics I intentionally made the site as simple as possible to reduce load time and bandwidth, thus it serves its purpose well, don't you think. Besides it is known that design plays but a small role in the popularity of a site. The primary factors are content, load time, and ease of navigation and this site has all that is listed.

07-03-2007, 11:19 PM	#11
pornask So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: 253-233-241 Posts: 6,518	It's nopt as bad when you get past first 2 pages. It's true that you don't need mind blowing design to have a successful site, but you still want to keep ellegance in mind as surfers could really leave rigth after seeing first page. I have an example of a simple site which seems to have a little better layout and design. Maybe it'll help you with ideas ;) --> Satan's Cock