Has gideon gallery ever made a post that wasn't boring?

[SteveLightspeed]

You seem very proud of the fact that you are slimy enough to rip off honest people and models by using legal loopholes so you can't be sued. Congrats you won a minor legal victory. Name all the models that you hold their domain names and misspells for ransom? Why don't you reveal ALL the facts here? Cuz you know you are ripping them off, and the "court of GFY" won't side with you if they knew all the details?


I've been involved in several lawsuits, most notably against Acacia, which has cost me over 6 figures so far.

I choose my battles wisely, do you?

Steve Lightspeed

[JFK]

I chose my sig spots wisely

[Karupted Charles]

Originally Posted by JFK

I chose my sig spots wisely

Indeed you did.

[High Plains Drifter]

(Bring back the Jordan Capri gif sigs!)

[candyflip]

Court of GFY

[XPays]

yo steve- dozens of your scenes are up on megarotic - tawni stone especially- fyi

[Flynn]

If I had a Sig I'd put it in this thread.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by XPays

yo steve- dozens of your scenes are up on megarotic - tawni stone especially- fyi

We are being robbed blind, but most people on GFY find that perfectly acceptable, and are looking forward to attending my next party.

[XPays]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

We are being robbed blind, but most people on GFY find that perfectly acceptable, and are looking forward to attending my next party.

http://berra.org

he is the first attorney we have worked with in 9 years that truly knows how to shut 'em down

[Niktamer]

http://alexa.com/data/details/traffi...=megarotic.com megarotic need to be shut down , who will ever sign up to any paysite after finding out all the full lenght movies from all your programs all together ads-free..

top 50 yesterday on alexa... how much was the cost of yesterday for the legit adult industry?

[jonesonyou]

me not think so.

[fris]

megarotic is probably just taking all their x rated material thats being uploaded to megaupload

[tony286]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

We are being robbed blind, but most people on GFY find that perfectly acceptable, and are looking forward to attending my next party.

I think for some reason people on the net,really don't see it as stealing even though it is. I wonder if you could go after the sponsors of these sites legally because they are financially supporting theft?

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

You seem very proud of the fact that you are slimy enough to rip off honest people and models by using legal loopholes so you can't be sued. Congrats you won a minor legal victory.

I've been involved in several lawsuits, most notably against Acacia, which has cost me over 6 figures so far.

I choose my battles wisely, do you?

Steve Lightspeed

So now refusing to give in to when you claim rights you don't legally have is ripping "off honest people and model"


Let get the fact clear

you trademarked raimi miller for a scope that should have given you the right to take the domain name away from me with a simple icann dispute.

you and your lawyer made mistakes in your terms of services/etc that licienced those rights to me. (4 of 238 common mistakes)

even though i walked you thru how those mistakes gave me the right to keep the domain i offered to give it to the model at cost ( i also offered to give it to her for free after you bitched about it)

you kept complaining because you wanted the domain for yourself.

I knew that the amount of work to get a trademark (for the scope you originally defined) for "raimi miller" would be massive. I saw an oppertunity to sell a service to other companies (mainstream and adult) that would identify those mistakes so they could protect that investment. There would have been an advantage to saying something like "lightspeed cash spent XXX hours at a cost of $XXX,XXX to trademark "raimi miller" but because they made 4 simple mistakes that licienced away their exclusive right to that name"

All i need to be able to make such a statement (without having to worry about false advertising claims) would be the proof of how much you spend and how much work was done SO i offered to give you the domain free and clear for the research you had ALREADY DONE TO GET THE TRADEMARK YOU SAID YOU HAD.

YOU AGREED TO THAT DEAL AND THEN YOU BACKED OUT.

1. the model who plays raimi miller could have the domain for free

2. you could have had the domain for free all you had to do was turn over the research you did for your trademark filing for raimi miller


The fact is your trademark was bogus (not valid for the scope you declared it) so you never had the rights you were claiming you did.

The fact is

i could have just explained your mistakes to you told you that you licienced the name to me legally and your trademark didn't mean shit (if it had actually been valid) so you could go fuck yourself

but i bent over backwards to make a deal that would allow you to fix your mistake for free (giving me the docs would have cost you nothing)

I was going to take the loss on everything i had spent to legally aquire the domain name, you backed out of the deal.

Those are the facts and you know it.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Name all the models that you hold their domain names and misspells for ransom? Why don't you reveal ALL the facts here? Cuz you know you are ripping them off, and the "court of GFY" won't side with you if they knew all the details?

you keep implying that i have ripped off other models could you name one (other than raimi miller see above post for why that is not legitimate example)

name one model who had to sleep with me to get the domain (your last bogus claim)

name one model who had to pay me more that what icann legally defines as cost of aquiring a domain.

I have never claimed to be a saint, i trade on the good will to make deals AFTER the domain is transfered. they are free to buy my coding services or not and i suspect they give me higher priority out on the job offers out of gratitude but it is NEVER a requirement to get the domain back because the OFFER of services is NEVER made before the transfer is made.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

So now refusing to give in to when you claim rights you don't legally have is ripping "off honest people and model"


Let get the fact clear

you trademarked raimi miller for a scope that should have given you the right to take the domain name away from me with a simple icann dispute.

you and your lawyer made mistakes in your terms of services/etc that licienced those rights to me. (4 of 238 common mistakes)

even though i walked you thru how those mistakes gave me the right to keep the domain i offered to give it to the model at cost ( i also offered to give it to her for free after you bitched about it)

you kept complaining because you wanted the domain for yourself.

I knew that the amount of work to get a trademark (for the scope you originally defined) for "raimi miller" would be massive. I saw an oppertunity to sell a service to other companies (mainstream and adult) that would identify those mistakes so they could protect that investment. There would have been an advantage to saying something like "lightspeed cash spent XXX hours at a cost of $XXX,XXX to trademark "raimi miller" but because they made 4 simple mistakes that licienced away their exclusive right to that name"

All i need to be able to make such a statement (without having to worry about false advertising claims) would be the proof of how much you spend and how much work was done SO i offered to give you the domain free and clear for the research you had ALREADY DONE TO GET THE TRADEMARK YOU SAID YOU HAD.

YOU AGREED TO THAT DEAL AND THEN YOU BACKED OUT.

1. the model who plays raimi miller could have the domain for free

2. you could have had the domain for free all you had to do was turn over the research you did for your trademark filing for raimi miller


The fact is your trademark was bogus (not valid for the scope you declared it) so you never had the rights you were claiming you did.

The fact is

i could have just explained your mistakes to you told you that you licienced the name to me legally and your trademark didn't mean shit (if it had actually been valid) so you could go fuck yourself

but i bent over backwards to make a deal that would allow you to fix your mistake for free (giving me the docs would have cost you nothing)

I was going to take the loss on everything i had spent to legally aquire the domain name, you backed out of the deal.

Those are the facts and you know it.

You really should try DECAF. Instead of hassling with you after you bored me to death, we decided to change her name to RAIMI WILDER instead, which she liked better anyway. THATway, I don't have to give you SHIT.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

You really should try DECAF. Instead of hassling with you after you bored me to death, we decided to change her name to RAIMI WILDER instead, which she liked better anyway. THATway, I don't have to give you SHIT.

interesting so rather than do something that would have cost you nothing you your claiming you willing sacrificed all of the marketing money you spent on raimi miller and all the revenue you could have earned from the domain raimimiller.com

so you could bitch and whine about it for years

Do you really think anyone here is that stupid.


At least we are getting closer to the truth now, your little admission that you could not sue me because "of a loophole" maybe in a couple of years we will finally get you to stop lying about this issue.



you know the deal i go away as soon as you tell the truth

[Grapesoda]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

We are being robbed blind, but most people on GFY find that perfectly acceptable, and are looking forward to attending my next party.

I sure don't and I won't be at the party either.... seems like the majority of folks at GFY live in theirs mom's basement and deliver pizza's any way... and another thought... there are more dick pictures posted every day on GFY, than there are on tour to a twink site

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

interesting so rather than do something that would have cost you nothing you your claiming you willing sacrificed all of the marketing money you spent on raimi miller and all the revenue you could have earned from the domain raimimiller.com

so you could bitch and whine about it for years

Do you really think anyone here is that stupid.


At least we are getting closer to the truth now, your little admission that you could not sue me because "of a loophole" maybe in a couple of years we will finally get you to stop lying about this issue.



you know the deal i go away as soon as you tell the truth

Ok, here's the truth. You sounded on the phone like a psychopathic stalker, and Raimi begged me not to give you any information about her. I sacrificed the money to protect her.

There, you forced it out of me.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Ok, here's the truth. You sounded on the phone like a psychopathic stalker, and Raimi begged me not to give you any information about her. I sacrificed the money to protect her.

There, you forced it out of me.

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Raimi Miller IS NOT HER NAME. It is the name I GAVE HER. She has never performed anywhere else as RAIMI MILLER.

considering i was asking for the trademark research for the name raimi miller and the model who played raimi miller never performed under that name there would have been no information about the model in that research.


problem with lying about things that are part of a public record is it really easy to prove your lying.

one step forward two step back

BTW steve you i only pointed out 4 of 20 mistakes you made that would allow people to get away ripping off your trademark.

when you do finally get tired of "getting ripped off" and do sue someone i can give them publically expose those mistakes one at a time and then those offending people will be protected by "loophole" that you have admitted protects me.

[Rochard]

Go get 'em Steve!

[SteveLightspeed]

I have never seen anyone cry so much about NOT getting sued!. You are a real piece of work. The issue isn't your "legal ground" at all...

You told me on the phone that you were "a big fan of Raimi's" and were "just trying to help her out" -- but then you told her she would have to sign a contract with you, promising not to let me ever have her domain. That's when we realized it was all just a stalker ploy to get her real name. Even now, years later, you are obsessed with her.

You are sick, man. Get some help!

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

I have never seen anyone cry so much about NOT getting sued!. You are a real piece of work. The issue isn't your "legal ground" at all...

You told me on the phone that you were "a big fan of Raimi's" and were "just trying to help her out" -- but then you told her she would have to sign a contract with you, promising not to let me ever have her domain. That's when we realized it was all just a stalker ploy to get her real name. Even now, years later, you are obsessed with her.

You are sick, man. Get some help!

First of all i asked YOU for the signed letter not raimi miller and you know it second i never said i was a "big fan of raimi" or that i was "just trying to help her out"

considering that in the chat transcript you said

"why did you hang up she told she want you to give me the domain and then the line went dead"

to which i responded
"that all i wanted to here i prefer to have a written record of our deal"

(and yes i know i misspelled hear but that what i did in the original chat transcript)

I am so glad we did make the agreement over the phone because of how much you love to lie about this subject.

[gideongallery]

btw the rest of the transcript shows us comming to the agreement for the research for the trademark just in case you want to lie again and claim that proves i agreed to give it to you clean.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

I am so glad we did make the agreement over the phone because of how much you love to lie about this subject.

typo should be

i am so glad we DIDN'T make the agreement over the phone because of how much you love to lie about this subject

[Luc Lone Ly]

your party ? fuck that son. I don't give a fuck about your gay party .enough cocks on JFY already .

[Juicy D. Links]

I will thow in a

"I like PIE"

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

You told me on the phone that you were "a big fan of Raimi's" and were "just trying to help her out" -- but then you told her she would have to sign a contract with you, promising not to let me ever have her domain.

btw so everyone know you are lie about what i said on the phone call part of our deal

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Look at what you added at the last minute, after I quoted your original post, above:

"and a sign letter that says you can't own raimimiller.com"

you were bitching that i spring this requirement on you at the last minute in this thread. Given the fact that this thread happened 2 years after our original chat there is no way i said anything about not giving you the domain in that phone conversation

second i specifically asked "you can't own raimimiller.com" and not "she can't give or sell you raimimiller.com". There is only one person in the world who could make such an agreement and that is you.

Finally the thread where i made the request was a conversation between you and me, so you couldn't even assume that i wanted "raimi miller" signature on the letter because she wasn't even present to agree to such a thing.

[SteveLightspeed]

Thanks for proving my original point about never posting anything that isn't BORING.

[Deej]

Raimi is a fun chick to hang out with

Much hotter in person

[ronaldo]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

we decided to change her name to RAIMI WILDER instead

Shit, I didn't know that. MY stalking skills are sorely lacking.

[seeric]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

We are being robbed blind, but most people on GFY find that perfectly acceptable, and are looking forward to attending my next party.

sad isnt' it?

a large percentage of the people on here or reading here on gfy are scammers themselves. watching what we do. seeing what pushes our buttons. discovering what we will go after them for and what we will tolerate.

fucking damn shame that content producers get raped for the benefit of people NOT buying subscriptions through networks supported by our OWN from the inside.

now thats some TOP NOTCH bro shit right there.

[sonofsam]

Originally Posted by Deej

Raimi is a fun chick to hang out with

Much hotter in person

Sluts are always fun to hang out with

[seeric]

also, i understand that this thread is not about torrents or content theft specifically. what i am commenting on is that fact how we all seem to semi fuck each other in the name of a few bucks. prob is not everyone has the same ethics. many here have none at all, many have very high ones. this is where conflicts lie, within the span between the two.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by A1R3K

also, i understand that this thread is not about torrents or content theft specifically. what i am commenting on is that fact how we all seem to semi fuck each other in the name of a few bucks. prob is not everyone has the same ethics. many here have none at all, many have very high ones. this is where conflicts lie, within the span between the two.

for the record steve asked me to not direct it to his site, so i made no money off the domain

The only person who is fucking steve over is steve, all he had to do to get the domain is fulfill his part of the agreement.

If steve would just tell the truth instead lying left right and center i would be perfectly willing to tell him the 16 other mistakes that would allow people to hijack is trademark consequence free.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

for the record steve asked me to not direct it to his site, so i made no money off the domain

The only person who is fucking steve over is steve, all he had to do to get the domain is fulfill his part of the agreement.

If steve would just tell the truth instead lying left right and center i would be perfectly willing to tell him the 16 other mistakes that would allow people to hijack is trademark consequence free.

In case you didn't notice, NO ONE is asking for your "help" here. PLEASE FUCK OFF AND DIE.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

Thanks for proving my original point about never posting anything that isn't BORING.

well i would rather be honest then interesting.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

In case you didn't notice, NO ONE is asking for your "help" here. PLEASE FUCK OFF AND DIE.

touchie touchie steve

as i have said repeatly it has nothing to do with helping anyone, had you honored our deal i would have made money.


Your Bullshit stalker lie has increased the number of scammers trying to get me to give them the domains (pretending to be the models)
and decreased the number of models who contact me to get them back.

Since i make more money giving the domains back and trading on the good will then i make from the domains your costing me money.

I realize everytime i expose the fact you don't have legal leg to stand in these disputes more and more scammers see you as a target and the more often you get ripped off.

You hurt my business with your lies, i hurt your business with the truth.


Tell the truth about this dispute instead of making up this stalker BS and we can both go back to making money.

Tell the truth and i am gone.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

well i would rather be honest then interesting.

My 8 years in this industry speaks for itself. As does your history of jacking domains for profit.

[SteveLightspeed]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

Your Bullshit stalker lie has increased the number of scammers trying to get me to give them the domains (pretending to be the models) and decreased the number of models who contact me to get them back.

So you admit that you are really only doing this to talk to the ACTUAL models, CAPTAIN SAVE-A-HO? Did it ever occur to you that most models in the sologirl world have companies that manage their sites?

You just proved that you are a STALKER! I'm putting you back on ignore now, I've made my point.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

So you admit that you are really only doing this to talk to the ACTUAL models, CAPTAIN SAVE-A-HO? Did it ever occur to you that most models in the sologirl world have companies that manage their sites?

You just proved that you are a STALKER! I'm putting you back on ignore now, I've made my point.

again with the lies

you know how much time i spent "talking to raimi miller" when you called me up

other then hearing you say "tell {him} you want him to {give} him the domain" (the words in brackets were muffled but i am guess that is what you said given her next statement)

you handed the phone to her and she said "i want you to give steve my domain"

I hung up imediately

you know it because the transcript shows you admitting that.


That why i said "contact me" not "talk to me" because i prefer written communications that way i have proof of everything.



see this is the Bullshit you have to deal with if you don't worship at the alter of steve.


The trademark research would have been worth at least 100k per year

the good will would have been worth 6-8 k per year defered when she quit (one of my companies is a modeling agencies so i could have earned booking fees when she walked from your program)

you could have offered me 20k for the domain i would have taken it, it has always been about the money to me.

and me exposing your companies vulnerbilities to having their trademarks abused is still all about the money.

I was going to do but since your being an lying asshole again, me paying people to legally screw with your trademark is all about the money.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

My 8 years in this industry speaks for itself.

absolutely steve

misrepresenting a fair use screen capture of your site as using your content so you could quash their cross selling better sites



failing to do the whitepaper search for your trademark and misrepresenting it as valid so you jack domains you really did have a right too


strong arming your model into accepting a lowball offer on a model referal

trying to convince review sites they should hide the fact that the model doesn't exist even though it not in there best interest because it is in your best interest

misrepresenting a complaint about you holding on to her name and likeness (her name as a domain) as bitching about being marketed well so you can trash a model who wanted to leave your program

and lets not forget how every time one of your models wants to jump ship you run to GFY and bad mouth them (poisoning the well of any external job offers). It is amazing how it never stops you from hiring back when they cave to your offer now that all those external offers "magically" dried up.


as to your claim that i am dishonestly jacking domains

you know that when i said

same reason you believe you do, because she signed a release granting a right to use her "name and likeness".

i was talking about kinzie kenner and how you took advantage of that loophole to keep the domain

considering that you mistakenly giving me a right to the raimi miller name in your old TOS was the exact same loophole it interesting how you only considering jacking a domain when your NOT doing it.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed

My 8 years in this industry speaks for itself.

absolutely steve

misrepresenting a fair use screen capture of your site as using your content so you could quash their cross selling better sites



failing to do the whitepaper search for your trademark and misrepresenting it as valid so you jack domains you really did have a right too


strong arming your model into accepting a lowball offer on a model referal

trying to convince review sites they should hide the fact that the model doesn't exist even though it not in there best interest because it is in your best interest

misrepresenting a complaint about you holding on to her name and likeness (her name as a domain) as bitching about being marketed well so you can trash a model who wanted to leave your program

and lets not forget how every time one of your models wants to jump ship you run to GFY and bad mouth them (poisoning the well of any external job offers). It is amazing how it never stops you from hiring back when they cave to your offer now that all those external offers "magically" dried up.


as to your claim that i am dishonestly jacking domains

you know that when i said

same reason you believe you do, because she signed a release granting a right to use her "name and likeness".

i was talking about kinzie kenner and how you took advantage of that loophole to keep the domain

considering that you mistakenly giving me a right to the raimi miller name in your old TOS was the exact same loophole it interesting how you only considering jacking a domain when your NOT doing it.

[gideongallery]

let forget about all of the slimy business practise and just focus on the "loophole" since both of us used the exact same "loophole"

you (and tucker) used the fact that kinzie kenner signed a contract with a "name and likeness" clause in it to keep the domain kinziekenner.com
you hired some buba to pretend to be kinzie and kept using the word official on your site tours

That way when some surfer came to the site they would believe it was a real site signup and never find her real official site klubkinzie.com.

conversely when i used the same exact loophole on you i could have created a tgp that featured all the galleries of sites which had the lightspeed plugin
pretended to be raimi miller and jacked sales away from your site but i didn't do that.


Care to explain why you believe using the loophole to jack someone's sales is more honest than simply using it to keep a domain you have a right to keep.