I will seek legal counsel, just a quick thought.. - GoFuckYourself.com

Doublecheeks · 08-04-2007, 01:55 PM

So right now the 2257 link is enough. If this new proposal goes through it won't be, secondary producers (which is me I think) will be focused to keep all model ids which will effectively turn the industry upside down. If I have that right..

I remember someone saying even cropping nude images to appear non-nude in the thumbnail is unacceptable. Ultimately, does that mean I can or can't have a non-nude site and link to a nude site and still be alright with the basic 2257 links?

woj · 08-04-2007, 02:11 PM

This has been discussed 50x already, I would search the board or just get advice from a lawyer...

MikeSmoke · 08-04-2007, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

This has been discussed 50x already

only 50?

and just WHERE would woj happen to come up with the number 50???

Doublecheeks · 08-04-2007, 03:05 PM

In the time in took to reply could have just said can or can't not like there aren't more stupid threads but thanks for nothing anyway

c-lo · 08-04-2007, 04:10 PM

As I understand it, you can't use a non-nude image that is cropped from an image that originally featured nudity without maintaining the proper docs. So if the images you use are not from a set that features nudity, but links to an entirely different set hosted by someone else, then I wouldn't think you'd need docs. I'm not 100% certain, though.

Let us know the results of your legal counseling, although I'm pretty sure different lawyers are telling people different things because it's so vague.

Doublecheeks · 08-04-2007, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c-lo

As I understand it, you can't use a non-nude image that is cropped from an image that originally featured nudity without maintaining the proper docs. So if the images you use are not from a set that features nudity, but links to an entirely different set hosted by someone else, then I wouldn't think you'd need docs. I'm not 100% certain, though.

Let us know the results of your legal counseling, although I'm pretty sure different lawyers are telling people different things because it's so vague.

Thank you

I'm trying to collect different opinions so I can debate them with my lawyer next weekend to further make sense of this.

tsmona · 08-04-2007, 04:39 PM

The rules aren't in effect yet as i understand it. Free speech coalition has alot of info on it. By just making these proposals the government has scared alot of people away from porn, which is their intent I guess

The Sultan Of Smut · 08-04-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

This has been discussed 50x already, I would search the board or just get advice from a lawyer...

Yup it has and I still don't get it. I mean c'mon is there no lawyer out there that will be able to make the argument that cropping an image to a non-nude form is actually creating a new image and should be treated as such?

It seems that the US government didn't quite write in everything they wanted in the law and are now trying to take a pound when they legally should only be taking a pinch.

08-04-2007, 01:55 PM	#1
Doublecheeks Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 22	I will seek legal counsel, just a quick thought.. So right now the 2257 link is enough. If this new proposal goes through it won't be, secondary producers (which is me I think) will be focused to keep all model ids which will effectively turn the industry upside down. If I have that right.. I remember someone saying even cropping nude images to appear non-nude in the thumbnail is unacceptable. Ultimately, does that mean I can or can't have a non-nude site and link to a nude site and still be alright with the basic 2257 links?

08-04-2007, 02:11 PM	#2
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	This has been discussed 50x already, I would search the board or just get advice from a lawyer... __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

08-04-2007, 04:10 PM	#5
c-lo Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Location: On search pages, on ICQ @ 308 7 43669, and in the U.S. Posts: 925	As I understand it, you can't use a non-nude image that is cropped from an image that originally featured nudity without maintaining the proper docs. So if the images you use are not from a set that features nudity, but links to an entirely different set hosted by someone else, then I wouldn't think you'd need docs. I'm not 100% certain, though. Let us know the results of your legal counseling, although I'm pretty sure different lawyers are telling people different things because it's so vague. __________________ The AlphaPhaze Network Traffic & Hardlink Trades \| Sponsors \| Resources The adult marketing network you can trust

08-04-2007, 04:39 PM	#7
tsmona Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 10	The rules aren't in effect yet as i understand it. Free speech coalition has alot of info on it. By just making these proposals the government has scared alot of people away from porn, which is their intent I guess __________________ Mona TSMona \|Mona's T-Girls \|Shemale Mona \|Mona's Asian Shemales \|Hawaii Shemale

08-04-2007, 03:05 PM	#4
Doublecheeks Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 22	In the time in took to reply could have just said can or can't not like there aren't more stupid threads but thanks for nothing anyway