Do you think North Korea will spark WWIII? - GoFuckYourself.com

m0307 · 10-21-2006, 06:25 PM

Things are not looking good.....

karlcore · 10-21-2006, 06:26 PM

In order for it to be a World War, North Korea would actually need allies. Who would side with them, Iran? pshaw

DjSap · 10-21-2006, 06:27 PM

probably not...radical muslims will be the ones who get a nuke and set it off sparking the next big war....

directfiesta · 10-21-2006, 06:28 PM

North Korea wont, the USA will ...

After all, who wages war lately ?

Spunky · 10-21-2006, 06:28 PM

I think they will ..too unstable over there

he-fox · 10-21-2006, 06:47 PM

The situation is very complex there, IMHO. The main danger is that NK will start to sell nuclear technology. I don't think they have the guts to use it. China has them by the balls...

tony286 · 10-21-2006, 06:48 PM

I dont think so its a bargaining tool but it does show the world you have a nuke your treated much differently than if you dont.

squishypimp · 10-21-2006, 06:48 PM

they could very easily.

stev0 · 10-21-2006, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

North Korea wont, the USA will ...

After all, who wages war lately ?

I'd have to agree

Jace · 10-21-2006, 06:56 PM

WWIII started a while ago, all major wars start with small conflicts that eventually lead to an all out brawl....look around, what do you see?

DaddyHalbucks · 10-21-2006, 07:14 PM

Al Qaeda will spark WWIII.

Al Qaeda already attacked us many times, and they promise to do bigger attacks in the future!

WAKE UP!!

DaddyHalbucks · 10-21-2006, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

North Korea wont, the USA will ...

After all, who wages war lately ?

I thought Canadians were supposed to be our friends.

How do other Americans feel about some Canadians (and other foreigners) who come on GFY to denigrate us and spill their bile about our country?

I hate it.

chaze · 10-21-2006, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karlcore

In order for it to be a World War, North Korea would actually need allies. Who would side with them, Iran? pshaw

Exactly if they get China and another major country like Russia or Iraq then were fucked. We will have Australia and France and maybe some other European support.

Not really fair.

South America will fly under the radar assuming the world will not implode. So buy your house in Brazil now

But in reality no one will side with there crazy ass so were fine.

No matter what they will start a war with someone though, that's what they are gearing up for.

DaddyHalbucks · 10-21-2006, 07:22 PM

I met a Korean today.

She told me that N. Korea is all bluff.

Worldnet · 10-21-2006, 08:00 PM

North korea talks allot of shit! I was on the dmz there for three years back in the sixties, and they were threatening shit all the time then also. The only thing they have going for them is a massive army. Of course we have something that could neutralize that real quick.

crockett · 10-21-2006, 09:20 PM

NK wouldn't have anyone to back them up.. China sure as hell wouldn't risk their new found sucess over NK.

nico-t · 10-21-2006, 09:21 PM

hahahahahaa NK spark WW3? How about the US, ever thought of that??

Dagwolf · 10-21-2006, 09:22 PM

Aw hell, no. It's just a pissant little country with a couple of bombs. They have a lot more to fear from the world than the world has to fear from them.

nico-t · 10-21-2006, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

I thought Canadians were supposed to be our friends.

How do other Americans feel about some Canadians (and other foreigners) who come on GFY to denigrate us and spill their bile about our country?

I hate it.

dont be so fucking naive.

amateurcanada · 10-21-2006, 09:25 PM

War is profitable.

Pleasurepays · 10-21-2006, 09:31 PM

if N Korea was a legitmate threat... they would be gone already. all that has to be done is to stop sending them aid and launch a propaganda war.

nico-t · 10-21-2006, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amateurcanada

War is profitable.

yes it probably is, but the us still gotta find out how..... they started WW3 as goal that they will be rulers of oil, but it backfired as a motherfucker and they are losing billions by the fucking day,,, when will they find out war aint as profitable as they thought in the first place? Vietnam part 50?

Nookster · 10-21-2006, 09:35 PM

Not WWIII but they will cause a ruckus and the US will go there and handle shit.

Webby · 10-21-2006, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m0307

Do you think North Korea will spark WWIII?

Things are not looking good.....

Quick answer - no.

And on condition others shut the fuck up and quit dumping countries into labels like the "Axis of Evil" and flying around the world trying to up the anti. They need to clean their own backyard out first before getting in the face of other nations.

nico-t · 10-21-2006, 09:37 PM

US sparks Word wars..... this thread is bigot.

Pleasurepays · 10-21-2006, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Quick answer - no.

And on condition others shut the fuck up and quit dumping countries into labels like the "Axis of Evil" and flying around the world trying to up the anti. They need to clean their own backyard out first before getting in the face of other nations.

\
/
see? this is EXACTLY what i was talking about. You will go so far in your ignorant "i hate bush/i hate america" bullshit to defend and apologize for a ruthless dictator who sits comfortably in a palace watching his people die by the millions of starvation because of HIS policies and as the direct result of HIS rule.

you can't wait to somehow weave Bush/US into the conversation as if he is "the problem".... as if that has anything at all to do with their situation, their history and the fact that they spit in the face of the WORLD, make threats, make a nuclear bomb and at the same time tell everyone "if you stop sending us aid, we will consider that an act of war and respond accordingly"

jesus christ. why not just take that last step and declare jihad and blow up a few innocent women and children because "bush made you"?

Mr Pheer · 10-21-2006, 10:23 PM

i never understood why idiots like you bring political and war discussion to an adult webmaster board.

oh let me guess you're just a surfer or maybe a gallery submitter at best

J. Falcon · 10-21-2006, 11:31 PM

Lerts hope not

Martin · 10-21-2006, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

\
/
see? this is EXACTLY what i was talking about. You will go so far in your ignorant "i hate bush/i hate america" bullshit to defend and apologize for a ruthless dictator who sits comfortably in a palace watching his people die by the millions of starvation because of HIS policies and as the direct result of HIS rule.

you can't wait to somehow weave Bush/US into the conversation as if he is "the problem".... as if that has anything at all to do with their situation, their history and the fact that they spit in the face of the WORLD, make threats, make a nuclear bomb and at the same time tell everyone "if you stop sending us aid, we will consider that an act of war and respond accordingly"

jesus christ. why not just take that last step and declare jihad and blow up a few innocent women and children because "bush made you"?

How old are you?

Barefootsies · 10-22-2006, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karlcore

In order for it to be a World War, North Korea would actually need allies. Who would side with them, Iran? pshaw

No.

Barefootsies · 10-22-2006, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DjSap

probably not...radical muslims will be the ones who get a nuke and set it off sparking the next big war....

Correct.

Lazonby · 10-22-2006, 07:41 AM

For the umpteenth time, WW3 has been and gone. We're already into WW4.

BoyAlley · 10-22-2006, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

I met a Korean today.

She told me that N. Korea is all bluff.

elasticatedman · 10-22-2006, 07:58 AM

I think they might spark WWIV

WWIII will probably be China

TeaseumGirls · 10-22-2006, 08:34 AM

I think Iran will do it before Korea....

TeaseumGirls · 10-22-2006, 08:35 AM

China and USA as much as they would like to lock horns, know better that if they do both sides will get fucked up

lambpie · 10-22-2006, 08:37 AM

Russia are actually very poorly equipped nowadays.. China are emerging as a real superpower..

reynold · 10-22-2006, 10:01 AM

I simply pray for peace and reconciliation.

godisdead · 10-22-2006, 10:16 AM

It's about time for another world war. The last one has been over for too long. Let's just wait till economic pressure has built up enough. The next war is as certain as death and taxes.

OG LennyT · 10-22-2006, 10:18 AM

no

-----------------

Argoz · 10-22-2006, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

North Korea wont, the USA will ...

After all, who wages war lately ?

what he said..

psili · 10-22-2006, 10:43 AM

Can't some of you fuckers face the facts that the majority of humanity just wants to live and strives to be content and happy in their own little world, and that the majority of humanity is controlled by small groups of people who have their own agenda?

From what I can tell (which isn't much), North Korea's a grey shithole with a few million regular people under a regiem that tries to keep some sort of stability in it's fucked up infastructure by building nukes, testing them and showing the world they're really not a shit hole. The same goes for Iran.

The question is, how do you deal with a large population that's been brainwashed with a mentality that's so far removed from being able to exist in a global population; a mentality, in some cases, that sees all "others" who don't have that same mentality as "enemies" and thus should be destroyed? Fuck... I have no idea. It's like asking "How do you prosecute a suicide bomber?"

And yes, my post is totally off topic from the "Will NK start WWIII". Apologies for it. I think, what we're seeing these days is different from conventional world wars. Some groups of populace are starting / in the midst of their own "reformation" and because we're already in a global community, the evolutionary steps of some cultures these days bleed into the lives of those further along the ladder. And those further along ( i.e. US ) who try and force their whims on those populaces, for whatever reason, aren't helping.

rodney25 · 10-22-2006, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m0307

Things are not looking good.....

Nope. I'd rather just consider it as an upcoming regional crisis.

Webby · 10-22-2006, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

\
/
see? this is EXACTLY what i was talking about. You will go so far in your ignorant "i hate bush/i hate america" bullshit to defend and apologize for a ruthless dictator who sits comfortably in a palace watching his people die by the millions of starvation because of HIS policies and as the direct result of HIS rule.

you can't wait to somehow weave Bush/US into the conversation as if he is "the problem".... as if that has anything at all to do with their situation, their history and the fact that they spit in the face of the WORLD, make threats, make a nuclear bomb and at the same time tell everyone "if you stop sending us aid, we will consider that an act of war and respond accordingly"

jesus christ. why not just take that last step and declare jihad and blow up a few innocent women and children because "bush made you"?

Have you gone stark raving mad??

It is clear you don't have the ability to conduct a rational debate without folks "hating America" bullshit and how "my hands are clean". That hoss don't run anymore - try another excuse. Is this your attempt at attack or diversion yet again?

For a guy boasting about visiting many other nations - you sure as hell don't appear to have learned much. Quit assuming answers to questions/issues that were never mentioned.

Fuck.. you are sad - get a grip man.

PS The management of other countries are not the biz of the US, but agree they are open to criticism. Get your own human rights back then you can talk.

psili · 10-22-2006, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

...

I don't know if I'd dig it if you two got along or continued having arguments because I enjoy both of your posts. So, for the sake of my post, I'll stick with I dig you both having dissimilar opinions and my enjoyment at reading both.

Thanks kids.

Pleasurepays · 10-22-2006, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

Have you gone stark raving mad??

It is clear you don't have the ability to conduct a rational debate without folks "hating America" bullshit and how "my hands are clean". That hoss don't run anymore - try another excuse. Is this your attempt at attack or diversion yet again?

For a guy boasting about visiting many other nations - you sure as hell don't appear to have learned much. Quit assuming answers to questions/issues that were never mentioned.

Fuck.. you are sad - get a grip man.

PS The management of other countries are not the biz of the US, but agree they are open to criticism. Get your own human rights back then you can talk.

again... i never insisted that the USA is right about anything. and whether you like it or not, all you and directfiesta do is bash the US. ever say anything positive? huh? geez... 300,000,000 people and nothing good ever happened here? no good people? no good things? weird.

I dont think the US is the shining beacon of truth and justice in the world. i have never said anything like that. i dont really have any strong opinions about this country at all and stongly prefer living Europe to the US. You keep making these remarks based on the wrong assumption that i am all about "us against them". I'm not. i am tired of listening to stupid arguments from you, showing 1 small facet of a complex, multi-sided argument that end with same punchline every single time - "the US sucks"-WITHOUT EXCEPTION.

If all i did was post everyday that your home country was nothing but a bunch of useless cunts, you would no doubt find it irritating after a while. if my every response (as yours is) was a weak argument to try to prove that they are in fact, cunts... you might find that quite annoying as well.

again... you couldn't stop yourself from ending a post about N Korea without taking a jab at the US. MY POINT was simply that the US has NOTHING TO DO WITH N KOREA being what it is. N Korea was a basket case pulling the same bullshit during Clinton... and before, when communists decided to lash out and rampage across the peninsula spreading the dream of equality and freedom from village to village with AK-47's, RPGs and flame throwers.

Try to get this through your thick hippy skull. I dont give a fuck about the US. I dont think the US is right about anything. unlike you, i understand that there are many sides to every argument. This is what your tunnel vision of ignorance won't allow you to read everytime i post it. I am not defending the US or the US position on ANYTHING. I dont fucking care. i am just talking about your dumb, over simplification of complex arguments and analysis of everything wrong on the world that always have the same common answer to "whats wrong" - Bush/US.

now basically you are reduced to being an apologist for a rogue, stalinist regime who spits in the face of the international community and its few would be allies and threatens the world with nuclear war if they won't send money and food, just so you can take another jab.

and you think i need to get a grip?

wow.

Kolargol · 10-22-2006, 02:37 PM

NK don't want or need a war which they would eventually lose. The problem is in South Korea - they really don't want any changes in the north because they are not ready to support financially several million hungry North Koreans.

Lykos · 10-22-2006, 04:53 PM

yeah preety posible

Webby · 10-22-2006, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

now basically you are reduced to being an apologist for a rogue, stalinist regime who spits in the face of the international community and its few would be allies and threatens the world with nuclear war if they won't send money and food, just so you can take another jab.

and you think i need to get a grip?

wow.

Interesting view you have there

Excuse the removal of most of your post - it has nothing to do with much.

What exactly do you keep trolling on about? What is your point? Constantly making assumptions (not only about me) and feeding yourself with possible reasons for "attack" is not even a valid debate - it's a rabble in your head.

Now I'm an "apologist for a rogue, stalinist regime"? Really??

I've never been called that before - you must be struggling with some assumption to reach that conclusion - but wrong as usual.

Obviously you seriously need to get a grip and quit talking bullshit and assumping more than ever was said or happened. Try it sometime - it's healthy

Pleasurepays · 10-22-2006, 05:50 PM

you accuse me of assuming all these things. all i have done is commented on your continued behavior. you again keep trying to say that my position is "X" - in your last post "reasons to attack" [n korea] - which is not anything that i ever mentioned or tried to defend or suggest we do. in fact, i have always said the opposite.. that its absolutely, 100% unnecessary since they don't represent a direct threat to the US and there are no interests to protect in N. Korea... and since you missed it and apparently comprehension is not your strong point, i have been talking about YOU.

what you can't address is the fact that there is a problem there, because a real discussion of the issues and facts can only detract from your constant "you live in a country of idiots, ran by an idiot" banter and its just to hard for you to tie in the cold hard facts on the ground, the history and the history on the problem to your little hate war without highlighting the shortsightedness of your own views. even though you deny it, there is a real problem there. but its not a US problem. since you always have your finger on the trigger for your "one size fits all" cause for all things bad on the planet -> Bush/USA.... you safely exempt yourself by default from any real consideration, thought and debate of the complexities of the matter and what solutions might defuse the situation, since you start the discussion with an answer... rather than working through the questions to a conclusion.

10-21-2006, 06:25 PM	#1
m0307 Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: U.S. Posts: 221	Do you think North Korea will spark WWIII? Things are not looking good.....

10-21-2006, 06:26 PM	#2
karlcore Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: www.derangedworld.net Posts: 134	In order for it to be a World War, North Korea would actually need allies. Who would side with them, Iran? pshaw __________________ Always looking for hard link trades: http://www.derangedworld.net ICQ: 277163851 AOL/Yahoo/ MSN/GoogleTalk IM: e-mail me first to be added

10-21-2006, 06:27 PM	#3
DjSap Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 3,869	probably not...radical muslims will be the ones who get a nuke and set it off sparking the next big war.... __________________ Blog Themes, TGP Design, Writing Services, Grunt Work ICQ: 66871495

10-21-2006, 06:28 PM	#4
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,667	North Korea wont, the USA will ... After all, who wages war lately ? __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

10-21-2006, 06:28 PM	#5
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,940	I think they will ..too unstable over there __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

10-21-2006, 06:47 PM	#6
he-fox Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico Posts: 2,884	The situation is very complex there, IMHO. The main danger is that NK will start to sell nuclear technology. I don't think they have the guts to use it. China has them by the balls...

10-21-2006, 06:48 PM	#7
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	I dont think so its a bargaining tool but it does show the world you have a nuke your treated much differently than if you dont.

10-21-2006, 06:48 PM	#8
squishypimp PostMaster General Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 10,781	they could very easily. __________________ Signature For Sale

10-21-2006, 06:56 PM	#10
Jace FBOP Class Of 2013 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: bumfuck, ky Posts: 35,562	WWIII started a while ago, all major wars start with small conflicts that eventually lead to an all out brawl....look around, what do you see?

10-21-2006, 07:14 PM	#11
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Al Qaeda will spark WWIII. Al Qaeda already attacked us many times, and they promise to do bigger attacks in the future! WAKE UP!! __________________ Boner Money

10-21-2006, 07:22 PM	#14
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	I met a Korean today. She told me that N. Korea is all bluff. __________________ Boner Money

10-21-2006, 08:00 PM	#15
Worldnet Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Atlanta Posts: 996	North korea talks allot of shit! I was on the dmz there for three years back in the sixties, and they were threatening shit all the time then also. The only thing they have going for them is a massive army. Of course we have something that could neutralize that real quick.

10-21-2006, 09:20 PM	#16
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	NK wouldn't have anyone to back them up.. China sure as hell wouldn't risk their new found sucess over NK. __________________ In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

10-21-2006, 09:21 PM	#17
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	hahahahahaa NK spark WW3? How about the US, ever thought of that??

10-21-2006, 09:22 PM	#18
Dagwolf President of Canada Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leaving Hell, Entering Limbo Posts: 23,141	Aw hell, no. It's just a pissant little country with a couple of bombs. They have a lot more to fear from the world than the world has to fear from them. __________________ Sleep well, and dream of large women.

10-21-2006, 09:25 PM	#20
amateurcanada Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,766	War is profitable. __________________ be our partner - join nichepartners today will.assum.producer @ AmateurCanada.com / icq: 30146166 / facebook.com/will.assum / #amateurcanada

10-21-2006, 09:31 PM	#21
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	if N Korea was a legitmate threat... they would be gone already. all that has to be done is to stop sending them aid and launch a propaganda war.

10-21-2006, 09:35 PM	#23
Nookster Confirmed IT Professional Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 3,744	Not WWIII but they will cause a ruckus and the US will go there and handle shit. __________________ The Best Affiliate Software, Ever.

10-21-2006, 09:37 PM	#25
nico-t emperor of my world Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: nethalands Posts: 29,903	US sparks Word wars..... this thread is bigot.

10-21-2006, 10:23 PM	#27
Mr Pheer Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 21,231	i never understood why idiots like you bring political and war discussion to an adult webmaster board. oh let me guess you're just a surfer or maybe a gallery submitter at best __________________ 2 lifeguards for Jessica

10-21-2006, 11:31 PM	#28
J. Falcon www.AdultCopywriters.com Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 31,618	Lerts hope not __________________ Adult Copywriters SEO Content for Porn Sites sales at adultcopywriters dot com

10-22-2006, 07:41 AM	#32
Lazonby Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2,262	For the umpteenth time, WW3 has been and gone. We're already into WW4.

10-22-2006, 07:58 AM	#34
elasticatedman Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: UK Posts: 120	I think they might spark WWIV WWIII will probably be China __________________ From onions to pearls

10-22-2006, 08:34 AM	#35
TeaseumGirls Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 248	I think Iran will do it before Korea....

10-22-2006, 08:35 AM	#36
TeaseumGirls Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 248	China and USA as much as they would like to lock horns, know better that if they do both sides will get fucked up

10-22-2006, 08:37 AM	#37
lambpie Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 671	Russia are actually very poorly equipped nowadays.. China are emerging as a real superpower..

10-22-2006, 10:01 AM	#38
reynold Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Global Traveler Posts: 51,271	I simply pray for peace and reconciliation.

10-22-2006, 10:16 AM	#39
godisdead Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,213	It's about time for another world war. The last one has been over for too long. Let's just wait till economic pressure has built up enough. The next war is as certain as death and taxes. __________________ $40 Flat Fee 70% Revshare YEAH THOSE ARE CRAZY PAYOUTS coming soon Crazy Payouts

10-22-2006, 10:18 AM	#40
OG LennyT Wall Street Pimp Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 14,345	no ----------------- __________________ Tradeking - my online broker \| 4.95 a trade \| make real $$

10-22-2006, 10:43 AM	#42
psili Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Loveland, CO Posts: 5,526	Can't some of you fuckers face the facts that the majority of humanity just wants to live and strives to be content and happy in their own little world, and that the majority of humanity is controlled by small groups of people who have their own agenda? From what I can tell (which isn't much), North Korea's a grey shithole with a few million regular people under a regiem that tries to keep some sort of stability in it's fucked up infastructure by building nukes, testing them and showing the world they're really not a shit hole. The same goes for Iran. The question is, how do you deal with a large population that's been brainwashed with a mentality that's so far removed from being able to exist in a global population; a mentality, in some cases, that sees all "others" who don't have that same mentality as "enemies" and thus should be destroyed? Fuck... I have no idea. It's like asking "How do you prosecute a suicide bomber?" And yes, my post is totally off topic from the "Will NK start WWIII". Apologies for it. I think, what we're seeing these days is different from conventional world wars. Some groups of populace are starting / in the midst of their own "reformation" and because we're already in a global community, the evolutionary steps of some cultures these days bleed into the lives of those further along the ladder. And those further along ( i.e. US ) who try and force their whims on those populaces, for whatever reason, aren't helping. __________________ Your post count means nothing.

10-22-2006, 02:37 PM	#47
Kolargol Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: www.footfetishsponsors.com Posts: 1,319	NK don't want or need a war which they would eventually lose. The problem is in South Korea - they really don't want any changes in the north because they are not ready to support financially several million hungry North Koreans.

10-22-2006, 04:53 PM	#48
Lykos Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: World Posts: 31,027	yeah preety posible __________________

10-22-2006, 05:50 PM	#50
Pleasurepays BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: I live in a pile of boogers Posts: 11,913	you accuse me of assuming all these things. all i have done is commented on your continued behavior. you again keep trying to say that my position is "X" - in your last post "reasons to attack" [n korea] - which is not anything that i ever mentioned or tried to defend or suggest we do. in fact, i have always said the opposite.. that its absolutely, 100% unnecessary since they don't represent a direct threat to the US and there are no interests to protect in N. Korea... and since you missed it and apparently comprehension is not your strong point, i have been talking about YOU. what you can't address is the fact that there is a problem there, because a real discussion of the issues and facts can only detract from your constant "you live in a country of idiots, ran by an idiot" banter and its just to hard for you to tie in the cold hard facts on the ground, the history and the history on the problem to your little hate war without highlighting the shortsightedness of your own views. even though you deny it, there is a real problem there. but its not a US problem. since you always have your finger on the trigger for your "one size fits all" cause for all things bad on the planet -> Bush/USA.... you safely exempt yourself by default from any real consideration, thought and debate of the complexities of the matter and what solutions might defuse the situation, since you start the discussion with an answer... rather than working through the questions to a conclusion.