redtube on fleshbot, who owns this video?

[will76]

http://fleshbot.com/356271/flesh-flicks-snow-job

Next question is, can you hold fleshbot responsible for content theft ? It is being displayed on their site even though it is not hosted by them.


Im curious who's video that is, i highly doubt it was a user submitted video.

[bashbug]

Might be sapphic erotica

[crockett]

And the best part is.. you likely know who uploaded it to red tube..

[Nydahl]

btw Will I read your thread about tubes
Would like to know what you think about who is gonna produce porn if all noninteractive sites are gonna die....still thinking about and can't come to any conclusion

[will76]

Originally Posted by Nydahl

btw Will I read your thread about tubes
Would like to know what you think about who is gonna produce porn if all noninteractive sites are gonna die....still thinking about and can't come to any conclusion

content producers will be out there, videos and pictures will always be needed for advertsing purposes. I just don't see a lot of content guys doing custom shoots like they use to. There custom shoot is being devalued big time. Who is going to pay 5K for a custom shoot just to have it stolen and displayed to millions of people for free, full video. However videos will still be needed, non exclusive cheaper stuff as filler for interactive websites and for tube sites. Also the interactive sites will continue to self produce their own content, which will be new stuff that constantly gets added to the net.

[Nydahl]

Originally Posted by will76

content producers will be out there, videos and pictures will always be needed for advertsing purposes. I just don't see a lot of content guys doing custom shoots like they use to. There custom shoot is being devalued big time. Who is going to pay 5K for a custom shoot just to have it stolen and displayed to millions of people for free, full video. However videos will still be needed, non exclusive cheaper stuff as filler for interactive websites and for tube sites. Also the interactive sites will continue to self produce their own content, which will be new stuff that constantly gets added to the net.

hmh interesting - its bit different from my point of view as content producer.We live on custom for now and got sales down for nonexclusive.
Maybe excl. content owners count with some DRM protection so they still invest in custom stuff
Anyway I always wonder why people simply don't take some money and buy out all the nonexcl. content providers (30K would get them tons of content) and set up completaly legal tube sites....maybe I am naive and don't understand the problem well.
anyway thnx for input

[will76]

Originally Posted by Nydahl

hmh interesting - its bit different from my point of view as content producer.We live on custom for now and got sales down for nonexclusive.
Maybe excl. content owners count with some DRM protection so they still invest in custom stuff
Anyway I always wonder why people simply don't take some money and buy out all the nonexcl. content providers (30K would get them tons of content) and set up completaly legal tube sites....maybe I am naive and don't understand the problem well.
anyway thnx for input

thats because the content guys have rediculous licenses when people *buy* content from them. I don't even know whey they call it "buying" because they all seem to have restrictions telling you what you can and can't do with it and if you do something wrong then you forfeit your license (lose your money). Its a license agreement to use, you not buying the content, just the right to use it. The content sites I have looked at, their licenses are so restrictive that i would bet 90% of the people who are buying from them are violating the license. Some of them say you can't put urls on the videos, you can't display more than (4) mpgs for a total of 60 seconds on the same page, etc. etc. etc.

Unless someone wants to "sell" content and not license it, they are not going to be able to put a tube site together by buying content, unless these guys change their rules.

[Nydahl]

Originally Posted by will76

thats because the content guys have rediculous licenses when people *buy* content from them. I don't even know whey they call it "buying" because they all seem to have restrictions telling you what you can and can't do with it and if you do something wrong then you forfeit your license (lose your money). Its a license agreement to use, you not buying the content, just the right to use it. The content sites I have looked at, their licenses are so restrictive that i would bet 90% of the people who are buying from them are violating the license. Some of them say you can't put urls on the videos, you can't display more than (4) mpgs for a total of 60 seconds on the same page, etc. etc. etc.

Unless someone wants to "sell" content and not license it, they are not going to be able to put a tube site together by buying content, unless these guys change their rules.

again - good point but from what I know the most of content providers would be more then happy to change that.We don't have such a restrictions but I am sure some do
thnx man

[topamillion]

the real question is who owns Redtube?