Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-14-2008, 07:16 AM   #1
clickhappy
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
So if I only use content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records?

Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?
clickhappy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 08:14 AM   #2
CurrentlySober
Too lazy to wipe my ass
 
CurrentlySober's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: A Public Bathroom
Posts: 38,622
Where are you running your biz from USA or elswhere?
__________________


👁️ 👍️ 💩
CurrentlySober is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:20 AM   #3
tranza
ICQ: 197-556-237
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: BRASIL !!!
Posts: 57,559
I didn't know about this!!!
__________________
I'm just a newbie.
tranza is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:24 AM   #4
Noe
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,082
Correct. The 2257 law was passed in 1995. Anything produced before that is considered exempt.
Noe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:28 AM   #5
the Shemp
congrats to the winners
 
the Shemp's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Echo Beach
Posts: 10,891
Quote:
Originally Posted by clickhappy View Post
Is that right?
This is all mature content so theres no teens anyways, but overall if I use content made in 1994 or earlier then I dont need to provide records, right?
i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...
the Shemp is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:29 AM   #6
Got Porn?
Confirmed User
 
Got Porn?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,264
2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.
Got Porn? is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:30 AM   #7
Got Porn?
Confirmed User
 
Got Porn?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Shemp View Post
i think its prior to July 3rd, 1995
you still need licenced content though, you cant just scan old skin mags...
What he said
Got Porn? is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:31 AM   #8
96ukssob
So Fucking Banananananas
 
96ukssob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it
Posts: 12,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Porn? View Post
2257 does not apply to content made before July 3, 1995.
you probably just need records stating each picture, movie, etc was filmed or shot before 1995
__________________
Email: Clicky on Me
96ukssob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 10:31 AM   #9
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
:2cents

Quote:
Originally Posted by clickhappy View Post
So if I only use LICENSED content made in the 80s I dont need 2257 records?
Correct.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 12:58 PM   #10
clickhappy
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,027
Kick ass!
I have access to license a treasure trove of content made in the 80s.
fucking awesome
clickhappy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 02:58 PM   #11
Tempest
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.
Tempest is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2008, 03:12 PM   #12
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest View Post
It's funny everyone thinking you don't need 2257 if the content is older than the law... Consider this.. How are you going to prove it?? It's another fucked up part of 2257 that in order to be able to prove that 2257 doesn't apply, you need some documentation and record keeping that's pretty much required for the content it does apply to.


exactly, and how can u prove the model is not under 18?

then there is that copyright infringement issue if you can't prove the license and the content owner comes after you...


Fight the spanish inquisition!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.