![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 36
|
Flash vs. Quick time clips
What is better to use as far as
1. quality 2. size 3. load time? If you have a site that uses flash or quick time, list the link here Thanks, |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
|
considering only 25% of surfers have quicktime installed, flash is the obvious answer
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
|
btw, I have a site that uses flash, www.youtube.com
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canadia
Posts: 2,222
|
flash reaches around 99% of computers out there vs. quick time which is a much smaller figure.....
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |