unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year - GoFuckYourself.com

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 04:31 PM

Quote:

We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

That's Andrew Stettner at the National Employment Law Project. He and his research partners at UC-Berkeley predict the share of long-term unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year. A quarter of that group is African American. And here are some trends among the long-term jobless: They increasingly include college graduates. Women are just as likely as men to be out of work for a long time. And workers over 45 account for well over a third of the long-term unemployed.

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/d..._unemployment/

AAB · 05-10-2009, 04:35 PM

I don't see that happening. An economy with 30% unemployment rate can't survive. I think the threshold is in the neighborhood of 21%

nation-x · 05-10-2009, 04:42 PM

There would be drastic measures taken before that would happen I think.

GatorB · 05-10-2009, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/d..._unemployment/

You need to learn to read. It doesn't say unemployment wil be 30% moron.

"We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

That's Andrew Stettner at the National Employment Law Project. He and his research partners at UC-Berkeley predict the share of long-term unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year"

That means of those that have been laid off 30% will be laid off 6 months or more. So if umployment is at 10% then 30% of those or 3% overall, will have been out of work for 6 months or more.

scuba steve · 05-10-2009, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x

There would be drastic measures taken before that would happen I think.

30%=anarchy and riots

LiveDose · 05-10-2009, 04:54 PM

No way toots. That won't happen.

Cyber Fucker · 05-10-2009, 04:56 PM

Not good...

EscortBiz · 05-10-2009, 05:17 PM

nah dont think we go above 10%

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

You need to learn to read. It doesn't say unemployment wil be 30% moron.

The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

DWB · 05-10-2009, 05:23 PM

Well, looks like the pornographers say it's not gonna happen so... it's not gonna happen.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy

Well, looks like the pornographers say it's not gonna happen so... it's not gonna happen.

Snake Doctor · 05-10-2009, 05:24 PM

Misleading thread titles rock

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

Misleading thread titles rock

Yeah. That is unheard of at GFY.

woj · 05-10-2009, 05:33 PM

Unemployment Rate 8.9% Apr 2009

IllTestYourGirls · 05-10-2009, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj

Unemployment Rate 8.9% Apr 2009

Underemployment rates are more important

24,700,000 Americans are underemployed

http://www.mybudget360.com/24700000-...t-158-percent/

Unemployed: 13,700,000

Part-time but looking for full-time: 8,900,000

Marginally Attached and Discouraged Workers: 2,100,000

About 15.8%

Si · 05-10-2009, 05:48 PM

As Don King once said:

"Only in america!"

PornoStar69 · 05-10-2009, 05:54 PM

Great Depression 2
(banks will crash,lose ALL your money)

World War 3

New World Order illuminati are behind current events they OWN Obamas ass.

DWB · 05-10-2009, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoStar69

Banks will crash,lose ALL your money

World War 3

New World Order illuminati are behind current events they OWN Obamas ass.

The biggest banks won't crash. They will just be nationalized and totally controlled.

WW3 is going to happen regardless.

NWO I won't argue with you. Obama is a Trojan horse and that's all I have to say about that.

Agent 488 · 05-10-2009, 06:28 PM

real unemployemt hit 15.7 i think?

things are getting more orwellian by the week.

GatorB · 05-10-2009, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

No BITCH it's you that need to learn to read. Please read CORRECTLY. It does NOT say that unemployment will be 30%. I already explained what he meant. Now I would appreciate an apology.

theking · 05-10-2009, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

You need to reread the article...as no where does it state what you are claiming.

Luscious Media · 05-10-2009, 09:36 PM

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

You need to reread the article...as no where does it state what you are claiming.

First of all, I am not 'claiming' shit bitch. I cited and article, and cut and paste a paragraph out of it.

Now, for those ignorant reading disabled fuckheads. Here is the article, from the direct link provided, quoted in it's entirety, complete with what I cited.

Quote:

TEXT OF STORY

Tess Vigeland: April unemployment numbers are due out tomorrow. Economists are predicting they'll show that the pace of layoffs is slowing. But the jobless rate is still on track to hit a 25-year high. And as Marketplace's Sarah Gardner reports, there's new evidence that long-term unemployment in this recession is also breaking some records.

Sarah Gardner: If you've been without a job for more than six months, know this: you've got plenty of company. A new report out today shows long-term unemployment is higher now than during the 1981 recession.

ANDREW STETTNER: We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

That's Andrew Stettner at the National Employment Law Project. He and his research partners at UC-Berkeley predict the share of long-term unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year. A quarter of that group is African American. And here are some trends among the long-term jobless: They increasingly include college graduates. Women are just as likely as men to be out of work for a long time. And workers over 45 account for well over a third of the long-term unemployed.

STETTNER: Older workers are increasingly being laid off, and they don't have the option of retirement. I think that's one thing that's really changed. They don't have savings or the equity in their houses to retire early.

Louis Avila of Sacramento isn't quite 45, but he's been looking for work since last March. He was a purchasing agent for a furniture maker that moved to Viet Nam. He's trying to remain positive.

LOUIS AVILA: You can't wait for the jobs to come across your computer or your e-mail. You have to look and call friends and network and maybe join some social-networking group.

But Avila says he's only had a few interviews in the last 14 months. He says forget about getting call backs. You find out online if you're rejected. Avila's decided that if nothing comes through soon, he'll have to go back to school.

I'm Sarah Gardner for Marketplace.

MrLuvr · 05-10-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

Go back to taking pictures of feet and trying to flog your stupid clip 4 sale stores you moron. You obviously don't even have basic comprehension skills. I always knew you were full of crap.

From the article you linked to:

Quote:

ANDREW STETTNER: We're nearly at one out of four laid-off workers has already been out of work for six months.

What does that mean to you? He is saying that 25% of those UNEMPLOYED already are long term unemployed, i.e out of a job for 6 months or more.

All he is saying is that number will rise to 30% OF UNEMPLOYED. NOT OF THE TOTAL POPULATION.

DO YOU GET IT? STUPID DUMB FUCK.

Probably not, you are too stupid to even know that you are stupid.

theking · 05-10-2009, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

First of all, I am not 'claiming' shit bitch. I cited and article, and cut and paste a paragraph out of it.

Now, for those ignorant reading disabled fuckheads. Here is the article, from the direct link provided, quoted in it's entirety, complete with what I cited.

Your reading comprehension skills are not very good...are they?

BTW...this is what your claim was "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year" and it simply not what the article states.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 09:59 PM

Pure comedy.

Not in my initial post, nor in any reply I have made in this thread, have I stated my position nor made a statement on my beliefs on the article in any way.

I quote and article, not written by me. Linking directly to it for you to read the comments from the author directly, yet you three are like the blind mice who can't read.

Priceless.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

BTW...this is what your claim was "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year" and it simply not what the article states.

Oh yeah? Where exactly do I claim this at any point in the thread in my words?

Yeah, didn't think so. Nice try though champ.

theking · 05-10-2009, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Oh yeah? Where exactly do I claim this at any point in the thread in my words?

Yeah, didn't think so. Nice try though champ.

Read the title to your thread...sport.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Read the title to your thread...sport.

Ah, so you ASSumed.

(insert appropriate cliche here)

Thanks for the laugh sport.

theking · 05-10-2009, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Ah, so you ASSumed.

(insert appropriate cliche here)

Thanks for the laugh sport.

I did not assume anything. You made a claim in the title of your thread and because you do not have good reading comprehension skills...you thought the article you posted backed up your claim and it does not...end of story...you are now dismissed.

MrLuvr · 05-10-2009, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Ah, so you ASSumed.

(insert appropriate cliche here)

Thanks for the laugh sport.

You are too stupid to even know that you are stupid.

[dfo] · 05-10-2009, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose

No way toots. That won't happen.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

I did not assume anything. You made a claim in the title of your post and because you do not have good reading comprehension skills...you thought the article you posted backed up your claim and it does not...end of story...you are now dismissed.

Oh right, now I follow you demented reasoning...

A direct sentence posted in the title of the thread, taken from an article, citing some guy, who is not me, is somehow me stating a position according to you?

Wow. Ignorance is bliss.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrLuvr

You are too stupid to even know that you are stupid.

Why not repeat it a third time?

This time click your heels and return to the land of reading comprehension.

GatorB · 05-10-2009, 10:29 PM

God you are fucking retard

YOU "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year"

Now you can claim you are just stating what the atricle states and you don't personally believe that. Except the article never states that. That is why you are stupid. You missed the whole point of the article. Nowhere in that article does that author say unemployment will reach 30% NOWHERE. Now are you just going to admit you misread the article or are you going to continue to act retarded?

shall I simplify it?

Say unemployment is 9% right now. So out of 1000 people 90 don't have a job. What the article says is the author believes that eventually 30% of those 90 ( that's 27 ) will be out of work 6 months or more. Not that 300 out of 1000 will be out of work.

the.drunk · 05-10-2009, 10:30 PM

speak for yourself

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Nowhere in that article does that author say unemployment will reach 30% NOWHERE.

Really? Wow.

http://www.gfy.com/15840401-post23.html

I quoted the article in it's entirety, and underline the sentence for your ignorance. Guess that must have missed your hawk eye huh?

Let me repeat it for you toots, I'll even give you a countdown for your third grade reading level.

1. At no time in this thread have I stated my opinion, in my words.
2. Thread title is verbatim an underlined passage in #23.
3. You are ASSuming, based on thread title, that is my opinion.

You are like a dog with a bone. You have to get the last word in, and always be right. In this case, it is pretty obvious to anyone with a brain cell I have not stated my opinion on the original cited article in any way in this thread. Furthermore, the thread title is verbatim out of the original story. Also not written by me.

Guess that's too complicated for you eh?

chodadog · 05-10-2009, 10:48 PM

Thread title was misleading 'cause you only quoted part of the sentence, and thus gave it a whole other meaning. Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Blingbaby · 05-10-2009, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

The one that needs to learn to read is you bitch. Was it too complicated to follow the linked the article? I quoted it verbatim. Fucking unreal.

GFY never ceases to amaze me.

He pretty much explained it to you, but obviously mathematics is not your strongest skill. Yes the planet is about to collapse, get in your jump pod and escape while you still can. Nuclear winter has already started in Australia..

Blingbaby · 05-10-2009, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Pure comedy.

Not in my initial post, nor in any reply I have made in this thread, have I stated my position nor made a statement on my beliefs on the article in any way.

I quote and article, not written by me. Linking directly to it for you to read the comments from the author directly, yet you three are like the blind mice who can't read.

Priceless.

Yo! Mr. Idiot. Someone has already pointed it out to you yet you are still trying to backtrack. The FUCKING THREAD TITLE that YOU typed says Unemployed will hit 30% by next year which is not what the article says at all. Get a clue dick..

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chodadog

Thread title was misleading 'cause you only quoted part of the sentence, and thus gave it a whole other meaning. Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Understood. They read the title, with was a part of the sentence (full sentence too long for title btw), assumed that was my position. Started attacking.

I am not protesting. Simply saying I have not stated my opinion. Which is obvious to anyone who can read.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby

He pretty much explained it to you, but obviously mathematics is not your strongest skill. Yes the planet is about to collapse, get in your jump pod and escape while you still can. Nuclear winter has already started in Australia..

I will pass it along to the original author of the article.

Blingbaby · 05-10-2009, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Oh right, now I follow you demented reasoning...

A direct sentence posted in the title of the thread, taken from an article, citing some guy, who is not me, is somehow me stating a position according to you?

Wow. Ignorance is bliss.

Yes you copied/paste half the sentence out of context, not understanding the whole article and now you get flamed for it. Have a little dignity sir and admit you fucked up don't make yourself look like a bigger ass than you already are..

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby

Yo! Mr. Idiot. Someone has already pointed it out to you yet you are still trying to backtrack. The FUCKING THREAD TITLE that YOU typed says Unemployed will hit 30% by next year which is not what the article says at all. Get a clue dick..

Right. You ASSumed. Got it.

Next time you say anything remotely relevant to anything in this industry. I will copy it, quote it verbatim. I will then make a thread. Take a sentence out of it, use that as the thread title, and hit post.

Then I can claim it is my opinion, and I was the one who said it instead of you.

Barefootsies · 05-10-2009, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blingbaby

Yes you copied/paste half the sentence out of context, not understanding the whole article

At no point have I remarked on my opinion, nor my understanding, of the article.

Fucking priceless.

Blingbaby · 05-10-2009, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Really? Wow.

http://www.gfy.com/15840401-post23.html

I quoted the article in it's entirety, and underline the sentence for your ignorance. Guess that must have missed your hawk eye huh?

Let me repeat it for you toots, I'll even give you a countdown for your third grade reading level.

1. At no time in this thread have I stated my opinion, in my words.
2. Thread title is verbatim an underlined passage in #23.
3. You are ASSuming, based on thread title, that is my opinion.

You are like a dog with a bone. You have to get the last word in, and always be right. In this case, it is pretty obvious to anyone with a brain cell I have not stated my opinion on the original cited article in any way in this thread. Furthermore, the thread title is verbatim out of the original story. Also not written by me.

Guess that's too complicated for you eh?

Dude, YOU are the dog but you don't even have a bone. You're barking because you're scared at this point or just plain stupid like any other dog?

voa · 05-11-2009, 12:35 AM

Interesting news

GatorB · 05-11-2009, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Understood. They read the title, with was a part of the sentence (full sentence too long for title btw), assumed that was my position. Started attacking.

I never said that was your position fucking retard. I'm "attacking" you because you're fucking retarded and can't read nor do math.

you posted a thread title "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year ". It doesn't matter whether you agreed with it or not. You CLEARLY got the gist of the article wrong because the article never says that. You keep claiming it does, but it does not.

OG LennyT · 05-11-2009, 07:30 AM

As much as I want to disagree with that fucktard Gator, Barefootsy guy is the loser here. Just a very honest opinion from a neutral 3rd party

CarlosTheGaucho · 05-11-2009, 07:37 AM

Less credit to spend - less profit - less salaries paid - it's a logical and scary spiral.

There was too much virtual money in the economy, simple and scary.

Now you see far too many jobs being artificially kept - companies loosing net of 40 pct. of their yearly budget, such as General Motors.

It's a complete fail of the system built on cheap credit and reactive consumer behavior, banking cowboys - what is incredible is how could this last for so long?

You can only spend more than you earn until there are resources to grab, now the fridge is empty.

SteveHardeman · 05-11-2009, 07:38 AM

Ladies, ladies, ladies, go take a Midol come back. Geezus.

:-)

05-10-2009, 04:54 PM	#6
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	No way toots. That won't happen. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

05-10-2009, 04:56 PM	#7
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	Not good... __________________

05-10-2009, 05:17 PM	#8
EscortBiz Fuck Checks, CASH only! Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York City Posts: 19,422	nah dont think we go above 10% __________________ Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts ICQ# 158802076

05-10-2009, 05:24 PM	#12
Snake Doctor I'm Lenny2 Bitch Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: On top of my soapbox Posts: 13,449	Misleading thread titles rock __________________ sig too big

05-10-2009, 05:33 PM	#14
woj <&(©¿©)&> Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chicago Posts: 47,882	Unemployment Rate 8.9% Apr 2009 __________________ Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000 Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

05-10-2009, 04:35 PM	#2
AAB Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Alberta Posts: 874	I don't see that happening. An economy with 30% unemployment rate can't survive. I think the threshold is in the neighborhood of 21%

05-10-2009, 04:42 PM	#3
nation-x Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 5,370	There would be drastic measures taken before that would happen I think.

05-10-2009, 05:23 PM	#10
DWB Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Encrypted. Access denied. Posts: 31,779	Well, looks like the pornographers say it's not gonna happen so... it's not gonna happen.

05-10-2009, 05:48 PM	#16
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	As Don King once said: "Only in america!"

05-10-2009, 05:54 PM	#17
PornoStar69 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: xxweekxx mothers bed. Posts: 2,036	Great Depression 2 (banks will crash,lose ALL your money) World War 3 New World Order illuminati are behind current events they OWN Obamas ass. __________________ GFY King?

05-10-2009, 06:28 PM	#19
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	real unemployemt hit 15.7 i think? things are getting more orwellian by the week.

05-10-2009, 09:36 PM	#22
Luscious Media Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Foxwoods Posts: 785	__________________ Luscious Media ICQ: 293-550-859 CFNM Cash

05-10-2009, 09:59 PM	#26
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Pure comedy. Not in my initial post, nor in any reply I have made in this thread, have I stated my position nor made a statement on my beliefs on the article in any way. I quote and article, not written by me. Linking directly to it for you to read the comments from the author directly, yet you three are like the blind mice who can't read. Priceless. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

05-10-2009, 10:29 PM	#35
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	God you are fucking retard YOU "unemployed will hit 30 percent by next year" Now you can claim you are just stating what the atricle states and you don't personally believe that. Except the article never states that. That is why you are stupid. You missed the whole point of the article. Nowhere in that article does that author say unemployment will reach 30% NOWHERE. Now are you just going to admit you misread the article or are you going to continue to act retarded? shall I simplify it? Say unemployment is 9% right now. So out of 1000 people 90 don't have a job. What the article says is the author believes that eventually 30% of those 90 ( that's 27 ) will be out of work 6 months or more. Not that 300 out of 1000 will be out of work.

05-10-2009, 10:30 PM	#36
the.drunk Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 712	speak for yourself __________________ find good domains : free epassporte : whitelabel webcams CONTACT ICQ 591549611

05-10-2009, 10:48 PM	#38
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Thread title was misleading 'cause you only quoted part of the sentence, and thus gave it a whole other meaning. Methinks thou doth protest too much. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

05-11-2009, 12:35 AM	#46
voa Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 16,532	Interesting news

05-11-2009, 07:30 AM	#48
OG LennyT Wall Street Pimp Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 14,345	As much as I want to disagree with that fucktard Gator, Barefootsy guy is the loser here. Just a very honest opinion from a neutral 3rd party __________________ Tradeking - my online broker \| 4.95 a trade \| make real $$

05-11-2009, 07:37 AM	#49
CarlosTheGaucho Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 9,512	Less credit to spend - less profit - less salaries paid - it's a logical and scary spiral. There was too much virtual money in the economy, simple and scary. Now you see far too many jobs being artificially kept - companies loosing net of 40 pct. of their yearly budget, such as General Motors. It's a complete fail of the system built on cheap credit and reactive consumer behavior, banking cowboys - what is incredible is how could this last for so long? You can only spend more than you earn until there are resources to grab, now the fridge is empty. __________________ CTG Media \| skype: carlosprague \| cb \|at\| ctgmedia \|dot\| net \| Want to make more with your Dating Traffic? \| Read My Educational Series \| Read my Adult Biz Chronicles \| Did your ad revenue drop by 40 pct. or more last year?

05-11-2009, 07:38 AM	#50
SteveHardeman Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Atlanta Posts: 1,728	Ladies, ladies, ladies, go take a Midol come back. Geezus. :-) __________________ BrokeAmateurs And ErosPOV And GirlsGoingSolo And PureAshley Sign Up At AmateursConvert.com Questions? I-C-Q: 3Five1FiveFive3476