![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
View Poll Results: Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped | |||
yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 38.46% |
no |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 46.15% |
do not care |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 15.38% |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
|
Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped
i love the site, but the latest fhg seem too over photoshoped.
what do you think? samples: http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...185250/1794391 http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...235649/1794391 http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...713575/1794391 http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...818175/1794391 http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...722408/1794391
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
WINNING!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,579
|
Quote:
Not really Females outside the UK just look that good |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,515
|
looks like met art people are finaly taking this site down with blured shit
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
I've always thought Erro's images looked a bit oversharpened.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 9,266
|
![]() ![]() ![]() btw, not too photoshopped, as a matter of fact it's on the lower side of nowadays ridiculous photoshopping. I've seen girls without nipples, without bellybutton, girls that look like was statues (just go to most TGP nowadays and you'll see it). This looks more like really good photography and some color correction and minor tweaking. In the first photo I saw you'd even see the net of veins in the girl's leg http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...d/185250/1.jpg as we are at it: why is that there's not a single site with over-photoshopping that ever succeeded, yet people still continues doing it? It really amazes me ![]()
__________________
This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Looking at boobs
Posts: 815
|
Great stuff, but yes, way over photoshopped.
__________________
How ya like my sig? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
|
i thought so.
top pics spoilt with silly photoshop.
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Now choke yourself!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,085
|
I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!
I will, however, sit down and rub one out.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
|
Quote:
me too
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
I am Amazing Content!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
|
i just know they were paying shitty low money to the girls
__________________
AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 968
|
Question is, do people sign up from it? If they do, it's not over-Photoshopped.
__________________
Donovan Trent |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,032
|
Digital artist here ---
I don't think so at all. It's obvious they're photoshopped to me, because I know girls' skin just ain't that perfect -- but most people wouldn't think that. They'd buy it, because it's good, subtle photoshop work. Overphotshopped is what the chick magazines do on their covers(Cosmo, bazaar, etc). They trim waistlines and make the skin look plastic. Erotica-archives skin tones look right.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
xxx
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
|
to me they look almost cartoon like rather than real pics.
__________________
The Affiliate Program |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,277
|
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... I mean, some people go for 3D porn and/or Anime... Do I find that a turn on, not at all... but some people do...
Errotica-Archives, to me, is about erotic nudes in exotic locales. Its goal isn't to appear realistic, leave that for reality sites. Instead I see the goal as fulfilling a fantasy and fantasy doesn't have to be realistic.
__________________
ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,277
|
A more interesting question to me would be...
In today's adult entertainment world with reality and realism soooo popular, does Errotica-Archives miss out on attracting a large percentage of users because they veer so far away from the some of todays hottest niches? However everything is cyclic, 80s fashion is coming back in right after retro 70s is fading out. 5 years from now the masses may have tired of the reality niche and may be swinging back into the fantasy realm in which case they'd be poised to dominate the market :P
__________________
ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,148
|
It is way too over photoshopped. The people that chime in here saying it is fine and creates the fantasy etc are missing the point. A picture can be TOTALLY photoshopped and still have that amazing glamour appearance. Once it looks like a plastic doll it has gone way too far.
I shoot a lot of mainstream and we spend up to 10-12 hours on a single image all the time. But you can't tell by looking at it that is is retouched. All the detail is still there. you can even see pores. But it is very clean. Here is a sample. Not the best pic in the world, but it illustrates my point .. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 278
|
I use photoshop for tat removal, if possible, and to smooth out skin blemishes or other unwanted artifacts. However, to enlarge breast, hips or whatever is when things get silly.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |