Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped
yes 5 38.46%
no 6 46.15%
do not care 2 15.38%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-09-2009, 04:26 PM   #1
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped

i love the site, but the latest fhg seem too over photoshoped.

what do you think?

samples:

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...185250/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...235649/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...713575/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...818175/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...722408/1794391
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:28 PM   #2
Machete_
WINNING!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,579

Not really

Females outside the UK just look that good
Machete_ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:30 PM   #3
katharos
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,515
looks like met art people are finaly taking this site down with blured shit
katharos is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:35 PM   #4
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
I've always thought Erro's images looked a bit oversharpened.
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:38 PM   #5
harvey
Confirmed User
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 9,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisH View Post
Not really

Females outside the UK just look that good


btw, not too photoshopped, as a matter of fact it's on the lower side of nowadays ridiculous photoshopping. I've seen girls without nipples, without bellybutton, girls that look like was statues (just go to most TGP nowadays and you'll see it). This looks more like really good photography and some color correction and minor tweaking. In the first photo I saw you'd even see the net of veins in the girl's leg

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...d/185250/1.jpg

as we are at it: why is that there's not a single site with over-photoshopping that ever succeeded, yet people still continues doing it? It really amazes me
__________________
This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth
harvey is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:43 PM   #6
Boogie3
Confirmed User
 
Boogie3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Looking at boobs
Posts: 815
Great stuff, but yes, way over photoshopped.
__________________
How ya like my sig?
Boogie3 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:49 PM   #7
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
i thought so.

top pics spoilt with silly photoshop.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 04:50 PM   #8
GrouchyAdmin
Now choke yourself!
 
GrouchyAdmin's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,085
I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!

I will, however, sit down and rub one out.
__________________
GrouchyAdmin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 07:24 PM   #9
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchyAdmin View Post
I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!

I will, however, sit down and rub one out.
he he

me too
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 07:45 PM   #10
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
i just know they were paying shitty low money to the girls
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 08:33 PM   #11
DonovanTrent
Confirmed User
 
DonovanTrent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 968
Question is, do people sign up from it? If they do, it's not over-Photoshopped.
__________________
Donovan Trent
DonovanTrent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2009, 08:49 PM   #12
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,032
Digital artist here ---

I don't think so at all. It's obvious they're photoshopped to me, because I know girls' skin just ain't that perfect -- but most people wouldn't think that. They'd buy it, because it's good, subtle photoshop work.

Overphotshopped is what the chick magazines do on their covers(Cosmo, bazaar, etc). They trim waistlines and make the skin look plastic.

Erotica-archives skin tones look right.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 02:38 PM   #13
DVTimes
xxx
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 31,544
to me they look almost cartoon like rather than real pics.
__________________
The Affiliate Program
DVTimes is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 02:51 PM   #14
BestXXXPorn
Confirmed User
 
BestXXXPorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,277
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... I mean, some people go for 3D porn and/or Anime... Do I find that a turn on, not at all... but some people do...

Errotica-Archives, to me, is about erotic nudes in exotic locales. Its goal isn't to appear realistic, leave that for reality sites. Instead I see the goal as fulfilling a fantasy and fantasy doesn't have to be realistic.
__________________
ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com
BestXXXPorn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 02:55 PM   #15
BestXXXPorn
Confirmed User
 
BestXXXPorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,277
A more interesting question to me would be...

In today's adult entertainment world with reality and realism soooo popular, does Errotica-Archives miss out on attracting a large percentage of users because they veer so far away from the some of todays hottest niches?

However everything is cyclic, 80s fashion is coming back in right after retro 70s is fading out. 5 years from now the masses may have tired of the reality niche and may be swinging back into the fantasy realm in which case they'd be poised to dominate the market :P
__________________
ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com
BestXXXPorn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 04:42 PM   #16
JayAllan
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,148
It is way too over photoshopped. The people that chime in here saying it is fine and creates the fantasy etc are missing the point. A picture can be TOTALLY photoshopped and still have that amazing glamour appearance. Once it looks like a plastic doll it has gone way too far.

I shoot a lot of mainstream and we spend up to 10-12 hours on a single image all the time. But you can't tell by looking at it that is is retouched. All the detail is still there. you can even see pores. But it is very clean.

Here is a sample. Not the best pic in the world, but it illustrates my point ..



JayAllan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2009, 04:48 PM   #17
Lassitor
Confirmed User
 
Lassitor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 278
I use photoshop for tat removal, if possible, and to smooth out skin blemishes or other unwanted artifacts. However, to enlarge breast, hips or whatever is when things get silly.
Lassitor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.