What's with all the NATS threads on the front page today? - GoFuckYourself.com

gleem · 10-20-2009, 09:36 AM

Call me paranoid, but I think some dark forces are getting lots of posters to start NATS threads from downright slanderous threads to harmless ones, just think it's kind of weird, counted 4 already.

/observation

Fletch XXX · 10-20-2009, 09:36 AM

now its 5...

gleem · 10-20-2009, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

now its 5...

yes, I felt I was missing out.

Twig · 10-20-2009, 10:53 AM

Sig spot omgz

The Porn Nerd · 10-20-2009, 11:12 AM

Isn't NATS the preffered system unethical sponsers use to SHAVE?

Never trust NATS.

gleem · 10-20-2009, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Isn't NATS the preffered system unethical sponsers use to SHAVE?

Never trust NATS.

No they are the only ones that never had a built in shave system, the others USED to have preloaded shave tools.

whatif_3 · 10-20-2009, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gleem

No they are the only ones that never had a built in shave system, the others USED to have preloaded shave tools.

nats had a built-in feature that allow programs to not credit affiliates for good joins they sent, mpa3 had the same thing, i dont see the difference

gleem · 10-20-2009, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3

nats had a built-in feature that allow programs to not credit affiliates for good joins they sent, mpa3 had the same thing, i dont see the difference

musta missed that memo, I don't see any button that takes sales away.

whatif_3 · 10-20-2009, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gleem

musta missed that memo, I don't see any button that takes sales away.

there was a backlash about it and they took it away

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John

Over the past few days there has been a lot of discussion about a feature recently added to the NATS system. This feature, verified and unverified joins was developed based upon the input of FlashCash and implemented for them.

After speaking with FlashCash in great length about what to do with the perception of these features they have decided to drop the use of unverified and verified signups along with their free trials.

We at NATS have decided that because of the concerns raised by affiliates about this feature we will be dropping it.

TMM_John · 10-20-2009, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3

there was a backlash about it and they took it away

You're continued portrayal of this as some type of shave feature is getting ridiculous.

I'm asking you to post proof of it being used to shave or retract your statements and stop implying what you have been.

This feature was a fraud detection feature. This feature was put in place requiring ANY sale which was determined to be fraud by the system to be SHOWN immediately to the affiliate.

This was in no way shaving. This was in no way "stealing" or not paying on "good" sales. This was in no way not fully disclosed to affiliates. This was in no way underhanded, secret, or hidden.

Again, I ask that you show proof of what you are accusing us of or stop damaging our reputation by making false accusations.

gleem · 10-20-2009, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3

there was a backlash about it and they took it away

Hmm, that's for the live stats deal that give instant payouts the second the sale comes in or something, which is crazy to have since there's sooo much fraud even revshare programs like mine have issues keeping the guys just using stolen cards to get the payouts.

I might be wrong but I think it worked in a way that showed the affiliate what was going on, so nothing was hidden, and it simply was meant as a fraud control, again nothing the affiliate couldn't see anyways.

I missed the post, but that's my best guess... again, nothing wrong with it, you have a personal agenda and it seems obvious.

whatif_3 · 10-20-2009, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3

nats had a built-in feature that allow programs to not credit affiliates for good joins they sent, mpa3 had the same thing, i dont see the difference

john, every time you talk shit about mpa3, im going to tell the truth about you

my statement is 100% accurate and factual

Quote:

Originally Posted by TMM_John

3) Unlike some other affiliate back ends, we have never and will never have a feature built into NATS for the purpose of shaving sales from affiliates.

TMM_John · 10-20-2009, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatif_3

john, every time you talk shit about mpa3, im going to tell the truth about you

my statement is 100% accurate and factual

At least you admit your motives.

Again, I ask you to post proof of you accusing us of offering shaving or be banned.

TMM_John · 10-20-2009, 01:21 PM

whatif_3, why do these pages:

http://trafficmanagementgroup.com/webmasterchecks.html
http://trafficmanagementgroup.com/privacy_policy.html

constantly reference WebmasterChecks and why does one have a WMC logo?

The Porn Nerd · 10-20-2009, 02:03 PM

Just because a feature isn't "built in', or no longer is, doesn't mean the system isn't fixable. Meaning: just because there's not a convenient button visible to morons doesn't mean someone who knows what they're doing couldn't figure a way to use it, anyway. It's called 'flaws in the system'.

Hey, I don't know, all I'm saying is: all the shaving stories people hear almost always involve NATS and not so much with other systems, that's all.

10-20-2009, 09:36 AM	#1
gleem Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Sunny Land Posts: 5,593	What's with all the NATS threads on the front page today? Call me paranoid, but I think some dark forces are getting lots of posters to start NATS threads from downright slanderous threads to harmless ones, just think it's kind of weird, counted 4 already. /observation __________________ Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

10-20-2009, 09:36 AM	#2
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	now its 5... __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

10-20-2009, 10:53 AM	#4
Twig Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: ICQ - 703894 Posts: 1,949	Sig spot omgz __________________

10-20-2009, 11:12 AM	#5
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,510	Isn't NATS the preffered system unethical sponsers use to SHAVE? Never trust NATS. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

10-20-2009, 01:21 PM	#14
TMM_John Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 6,658	whatif_3, why do these pages: http://trafficmanagementgroup.com/webmasterchecks.html http://trafficmanagementgroup.com/privacy_policy.html constantly reference WebmasterChecks and why does one have a WMC logo? __________________ Skype: JohnA1078 Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

10-20-2009, 02:03 PM	#15
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,510	Just because a feature isn't "built in', or no longer is, doesn't mean the system isn't fixable. Meaning: just because there's not a convenient button visible to morons doesn't mean someone who knows what they're doing couldn't figure a way to use it, anyway. It's called 'flaws in the system'. Hey, I don't know, all I'm saying is: all the shaving stories people hear almost always involve NATS and not so much with other systems, that's all. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia