so you thought that in mainstream is more ethic? ha, ha,mayor shaving cause-snapnames - GoFuckYourself.com

teomaxxx · 11-05-2009, 04:48 PM

Nelson Brady, VP of Operations of snapnames was caught as "rough employee"...

everybody better belive their stupid story or snapnames is finished, while most of big customers saw that guy as insider as soon as 2006 and were complaining on domain forums all the time about that guy, while snapnames laughed all the way up until yesterday....those guys are finished.

all customers of snapnames got this email yesterday:
Dear SnapNames customer:

I’m contacting you today to inform you of an unfortunate incident at SnapNames, and to let you know what the company is doing to address it.

Recently, SnapNames discovered that an employee had set up an account on the SnapNames system under a false name and, under this name, bid in SnapNames auctions. This is a clear violation of our internal policy and was not approved by the company. We deeply regret that this conduct has impacted our customers.

Extent of impact

This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions:

* Bidding affected approximately five percent of total SnapNames auctions since 2005, most of which occurred between 2005 and 2007.
* The incremental revenue from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames’ auction revenue since 2005.

No matter the level of impact, SnapNames takes this matter extremely seriously. When the matter was discovered, the company immediately closed the account in question and began a thorough investigation. The employee has also been dismissed from the company.

SnapNames further discovered that, on certain recent and limited occasions, when the employee won an auction, the employee secretly arranged to refund from SnapNames to the fictitious account a portion of the winning bid amount.

washington post even wrote about this case
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sec..._bid_up_d.html
SnapNames: Former exec. bid up domain prices
SnapNames, the largest reseller of Web site names, Wednesday alleged that a former top executive secretly bid on tens of thousands of domain name auctions over the past four years, driving up costs for other bidders and enriching himself in the process.

SnapNames owner Oversee.net said it learned about a month ago that the executive had been bidding on its domain auctions in violation of company policy that bars employees from doing so.

Mason Cole, vice president of Oversee corporate communications, said the executive was dismissed Monday.

The company Wednesday began notifying affected customers via e-mail, stating that "in every auction where the employee's fictitious account submitted a bid which resulted in a higher price being paid by the winning bidder, SnapNames will offer a rebate, with 5.22 percent interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), to affect customers for the difference between the prices they actually paid and the prices they would have paid, had the employee not bid in the auctions."

The message to customers said the bulk of the bidding occurred on auctions between 2005 and 2007, but that the employee's bidding affected about 5 percent of total SnapNames auction since 2005. In addition, Oversee said the incremental value from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames' auction revenue during that same time.

Cole said as many as 50,000 domain name auctions may have been affected by the employee's unauthorized activity. Cole declined to say what legal steps, if any, Oversee planned to take a result of the incident.

"He had pretty deep insight into our system," Cole said of the former executive. "I don't know whether he was one of the founding employees [at SnapNames], but he was one of the first."

Oversee alleges that the employee made the bids using an auction account set up under the alias "Hank Alvarez". The company says that in certain cases where the employee won the action, he paid for the domain and then arranged to refund a portion of the winning bid amount to his account.

Barefootsies · 11-05-2009, 04:54 PM

"the rouge employee' classic.

Pixelbucks Eric · 11-05-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

"the rouge employee' classic.

The article mentions "rough employee".

I both cases I assume you're talking about a rogue employee?

Cyber Fucker · 11-05-2009, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx

Nelson Brady, VP of Operations of snapnames was caught as "rough employee"...

everybody better belive their stupid story or snapnames is finished, while most of big customers saw that guy as insider as soon as 2006 and were complaining on domain forums all the time about that guy, while snapnames laughed all the way up until yesterday....those guys are finished.

all customers of snapnames got this email yesterday:
Dear SnapNames customer:

I’m contacting you today to inform you of an unfortunate incident at SnapNames, and to let you know what the company is doing to address it.

Recently, SnapNames discovered that an employee had set up an account on the SnapNames system under a false name and, under this name, bid in SnapNames auctions. This is a clear violation of our internal policy and was not approved by the company. We deeply regret that this conduct has impacted our customers.

Extent of impact

This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions:

* Bidding affected approximately five percent of total SnapNames auctions since 2005, most of which occurred between 2005 and 2007.
* The incremental revenue from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames’ auction revenue since 2005.

No matter the level of impact, SnapNames takes this matter extremely seriously. When the matter was discovered, the company immediately closed the account in question and began a thorough investigation. The employee has also been dismissed from the company.

SnapNames further discovered that, on certain recent and limited occasions, when the employee won an auction, the employee secretly arranged to refund from SnapNames to the fictitious account a portion of the winning bid amount.

washington post even wrote about this case
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sec..._bid_up_d.html
SnapNames: Former exec. bid up domain prices
SnapNames, the largest reseller of Web site names, Wednesday alleged that a former top executive secretly bid on tens of thousands of domain name auctions over the past four years, driving up costs for other bidders and enriching himself in the process.

SnapNames owner Oversee.net said it learned about a month ago that the executive had been bidding on its domain auctions in violation of company policy that bars employees from doing so.

Mason Cole, vice president of Oversee corporate communications, said the executive was dismissed Monday.

The company Wednesday began notifying affected customers via e-mail, stating that "in every auction where the employee's fictitious account submitted a bid which resulted in a higher price being paid by the winning bidder, SnapNames will offer a rebate, with 5.22 percent interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), to affect customers for the difference between the prices they actually paid and the prices they would have paid, had the employee not bid in the auctions."

The message to customers said the bulk of the bidding occurred on auctions between 2005 and 2007, but that the employee's bidding affected about 5 percent of total SnapNames auction since 2005. In addition, Oversee said the incremental value from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames' auction revenue during that same time.

Cole said as many as 50,000 domain name auctions may have been affected by the employee's unauthorized activity. Cole declined to say what legal steps, if any, Oversee planned to take a result of the incident.

"He had pretty deep insight into our system," Cole said of the former executive. "I don't know whether he was one of the founding employees [at SnapNames], but he was one of the first."

Oversee alleges that the employee made the bids using an auction account set up under the alias "Hank Alvarez". The company says that in certain cases where the employee won the action, he paid for the domain and then arranged to refund a portion of the winning bid amount to his account.

no wonder why I can't successfully backorder or win any better domain at godaddy or snapnames, fucking scams

papill0n · 11-05-2009, 06:45 PM

errr yeah :\

dyna mo · 11-05-2009, 07:00 PM

snapnames knew all along. anyone who doesn’t know how dirty the domain name business is just doesn’t know the domain name business.

11-05-2009, 04:48 PM	#1
teomaxxx Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,734	so you thought that in mainstream is more ethic? ha, ha,mayor shaving cause-snapnames Nelson Brady, VP of Operations of snapnames was caught as "rough employee"... everybody better belive their stupid story or snapnames is finished, while most of big customers saw that guy as insider as soon as 2006 and were complaining on domain forums all the time about that guy, while snapnames laughed all the way up until yesterday....those guys are finished. all customers of snapnames got this email yesterday: Dear SnapNames customer: I’m contacting you today to inform you of an unfortunate incident at SnapNames, and to let you know what the company is doing to address it. Recently, SnapNames discovered that an employee had set up an account on the SnapNames system under a false name and, under this name, bid in SnapNames auctions. This is a clear violation of our internal policy and was not approved by the company. We deeply regret that this conduct has impacted our customers. Extent of impact This conduct affected a small percentage of SnapNames auctions: * Bidding affected approximately five percent of total SnapNames auctions since 2005, most of which occurred between 2005 and 2007. * The incremental revenue from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames’ auction revenue since 2005. No matter the level of impact, SnapNames takes this matter extremely seriously. When the matter was discovered, the company immediately closed the account in question and began a thorough investigation. The employee has also been dismissed from the company. SnapNames further discovered that, on certain recent and limited occasions, when the employee won an auction, the employee secretly arranged to refund from SnapNames to the fictitious account a portion of the winning bid amount. washington post even wrote about this case http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sec..._bid_up_d.html SnapNames: Former exec. bid up domain prices SnapNames, the largest reseller of Web site names, Wednesday alleged that a former top executive secretly bid on tens of thousands of domain name auctions over the past four years, driving up costs for other bidders and enriching himself in the process. SnapNames owner Oversee.net said it learned about a month ago that the executive had been bidding on its domain auctions in violation of company policy that bars employees from doing so. Mason Cole, vice president of Oversee corporate communications, said the executive was dismissed Monday. The company Wednesday began notifying affected customers via e-mail, stating that "in every auction where the employee's fictitious account submitted a bid which resulted in a higher price being paid by the winning bidder, SnapNames will offer a rebate, with 5.22 percent interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), to affect customers for the difference between the prices they actually paid and the prices they would have paid, had the employee not bid in the auctions." The message to customers said the bulk of the bidding occurred on auctions between 2005 and 2007, but that the employee's bidding affected about 5 percent of total SnapNames auction since 2005. In addition, Oversee said the incremental value from the bidding represented approximately one percent of SnapNames' auction revenue during that same time. Cole said as many as 50,000 domain name auctions may have been affected by the employee's unauthorized activity. Cole declined to say what legal steps, if any, Oversee planned to take a result of the incident. "He had pretty deep insight into our system," Cole said of the former executive. "I don't know whether he was one of the founding employees [at SnapNames], but he was one of the first." Oversee alleges that the employee made the bids using an auction account set up under the alias "Hank Alvarez". The company says that in certain cases where the employee won the action, he paid for the domain and then arranged to refund a portion of the winning bid amount to his account. Last edited by teomaxxx; 11-05-2009 at 04:51 PM..

11-05-2009, 04:54 PM	#2
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	"the rouge employee' classic. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

11-05-2009, 06:45 PM	#5
papill0n Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 15,547	errr yeah :\

11-05-2009, 07:00 PM	#6
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,913	snapnames knew all along. anyone who doesn’t know how dirty the domain name business is just doesn’t know the domain name business.