GFY mods what the hell ?? - GoFuckYourself.com

Due · 12-14-2009, 04:51 PM

What the hell is going on here at the board ?
There may be disputes between 2 parties but allowing people to openly accuse one party for shooting underage porn and shit like this is a completely different story, shit what the hell is this place turning into ?

I don't mind anyone to hate on anyone, but this is turning out to be ridiculous and pathetic, at least keep the hate on a professional level

sicone · 12-14-2009, 04:53 PM

I must have missed that thread...

AaronM · 12-14-2009, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sicone

I must have missed that thread...

It's 30 something pages long.......Kinda difficult to miss it.

ManuteBol · 12-14-2009, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

What the hell is going on here at the board ?
There may be disputes between 2 parties but allowing people to openly accuse one party for shooting underage porn and shit like this is a completely different story, shit what the hell is this place turning into ?

I don't mind anyone to hate on anyone, but this is turning out to be ridiculous and pathetic, at least keep the hate on a professional level

Lighten up Francis.

AaronM · 12-14-2009, 04:55 PM

However......I don't see why Due would be the one to start a thread about it since it doesn't concern him in any way.

sicone · 12-14-2009, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

It's 30 something pages long.......Kinda difficult to miss it.

Oh.. that thread.. yeah I stopped reading it when it was like 2 pages

Due · 12-14-2009, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

However......I don't see why Due would be the one to start a thread about it since it doesn't concern him in any way.

I know him personally, I consider him a good friend.
I was pretty shocked when I just checked on the "hate" with the stuff that's being posted in there

Deej · 12-14-2009, 05:04 PM

It was a legitimate news posting... Your friend could have stopped it in the beginning by doing whats right and paid his affiliate.... Am I right?

You can admit it... I mean were way past humility...

A friend is a friend...

A business is a business...

lagcam · 12-14-2009, 05:06 PM

If he was a good friend of mine, I would have told him to do the right thing over this whole stupid matter.

Anyway,

to your balls, for nailing your colours to that mast.

fmltube · 12-14-2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

What the hell is going on here at the board ?
There may be disputes between 2 parties but allowing people to openly accuse one party for shooting underage porn and shit like this is a completely different story, shit what the hell is this place turning into ?

I don't mind anyone to hate on anyone, but this is turning out to be ridiculous and pathetic, at least keep the hate on a professional level

Shooting an underage model is professional? Good one buddy. Friends of a feather......

Due · 12-14-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fmltube

Shooting an underage model is professional? Good one buddy. Friends of a feather......

This is what I'm referring to.

fmltube · 12-14-2009, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

I know him personally, I consider him a good friend.
I was pretty shocked when I just checked on the "hate" with the stuff that's being posted in there

And according to whore monger, your fiance should be well aware of the Kelsie accusation since Jenni works so closely to Dirty D.

KrissyElise · 12-14-2009, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam

If he was a good friend of mine, I would have told him to do the right thing over this whole stupid matter.

Might as well call lagcam Confucius. I choose not to be good friends with people that choose to do the wrong thing.

sicone · 12-14-2009, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

This is what I'm referring to.

Perhaps you should refer to the news article about these allegations...

Jdoughs · 12-14-2009, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fmltube

And according to whore monger, your fiance should be well aware of the Kelsie accusation since Jenni works so closely to Dirty D.

Now is the time you link actual news stories, or other factual proof. I am not in anyway saying this didn't, or did happen, but quoting a random unknown nick (that you do not know in any way) is not exactly solid proof to such strong claims.

Things you are saying can end a persons career, and possibly livelihood, permanently. A business, a few families, and the lives of many people could be hurt by such claims.

Use some tact and think about the repercussions of what you say, and what you base your 'facts' on. Unless you are certain 100% that this happened, and have proof to back it up so that the industry can react upon that, you have no business implying it anywhere, to anyone, especially on an industry board.

Just sayin, ya know?

Due · 12-14-2009, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

It was a legitimate news posting... Your friend could have stopped it in the beginning by doing whats right and paid his affiliate.... Am I right?

You can admit it... I mean were way past humility...

A friend is a friend...

A business is a business...

The professional level in that thread is long gone, there is nothing in there that is currently business related.

I see the point from both sides and I think they both feel screwed, but that's not what's really on topic right now.

fmltube · 12-14-2009, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdoughs

Now is the time you link actual news stories, or other factual proof. I am not in anyway saying this didn't, or did happen, but quoting a random unknown nick (that you do not know in any way) is not exactly solid proof to such strong claims.

Things you are saying can end a persons career, and possibly livelihood, permanently. A business, a few families, and the lives of many people could be hurt by such claims.

Use some tact and think about the repercussions of what you say, and what you base your 'facts' on. Unless you are certain 100% that this happened, and have proof to back it up so that the industry can react upon that, you have no business implying it anywhere, to anyone, especially on an industry board.

Just sayin, ya know?

Links were provided in that thread in question. Might want to check it out...just sayin, ya know?

fmltube · 12-14-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

The professional level in that thread is long gone, there is nothing in there that is currently business related.

I see the point from both sides and I think they both feel screwed, but that's not what's really on topic right now.

So are you willing to say with 100% certainty that Dirty D did not shoot a video with a model was 17 years old at the time of production?

Deej · 12-14-2009, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

The professional level in that thread is long gone, there is nothing in there that is currently business related.

I see the point from both sides and I think they both feel screwed, but that's not what's really on topic right now.

Ill agree, there is un business oriented minds in there. But you can also notice that the reputable people there kept it on track. It IS a business matter. Will agree with you that the allegations are a huge burden. But it is a news article. It isnt just an allegation thrown about in words. It also wasnt made more widely public by the OP. It most likely wouldnt have come out in the first place had D done the right business thing in the beginning and not what he personally felt was right.

You can agree with all of this... right?

Adraco · 12-14-2009, 05:40 PM

I don't know anything about who did what, and I stopped reading the thread after about 15 pages.

Accusations are one thing, and can be quite serious, but at least in all the countries I do business, you are not guilty until proven otherwise. So for what it's worth,
Dirty D seems to have screwed an affiliate out on a few hundred dollars. However he di or didn't shoot underaged models, well, just apply not guilty until proven otherwise.

Sly · 12-14-2009, 05:42 PM

I find it kind of interesting how involved totally unrelated parties can get in an issue that really doesn't involve them.

Barefootsies · 12-14-2009, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ManuteBol

Lighten up Francis.

KrissyElise · 12-14-2009, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I find it kind of interesting how involved totally unrelated parties can get in an issue that really doesn't involve them.

Touche Sly! Nicely Done!

Due · 12-14-2009, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fmltube

So are you willing to say with 100% certainty that Dirty D did not shoot a video with a model was 17 years old at the time of production?

I can't deny or confirm anything, can YOU ?
I heard this rumor before and seen the model verification process as well. I would say based on my due diligence he got the model ids in place as required by law.
I'd like you to point out the URLs to the content in question that you hold evidence is underage.

Due · 12-14-2009, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

I find it kind of interesting how involved totally unrelated parties can get in an issue that really doesn't involve them.

Having approved D's sites personally for processing certainly involves me.
Other than that, yes I find it kind of scary that anyone can go and post anything without proof or consequences

KrissyElise;
Yes, very nicely done.

weekly · 12-14-2009, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

Having approved D's sites personally for processing certainly involves me.
Other than that, yes I find it kind of scary that anyone can go and post anything without proof or consequences

KrissyElise;
Yes, very nicely done.

You are an "interested party" in all of this I believe. Not exactly an impartial opinion. You are in biz with Dirt, right? Perhaps you are not the right person to be doing the damage control here. In fact the ship seems to be floundering at the moment.

Due · 12-14-2009, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by weekly

You are an "interested party" in all of this I believe. Not exactly an impartial opinion. You are in biz with Dirt, right? Perhaps you are not the right person to be doing the damage control here. In fact the ship seems to be floundering at the moment.

I'm not trying to do damage control. How on earth could you think a request for proof could be "damage control"

weekly · 12-14-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

I'm not trying to do damage control. How on earth could you think a request for proof could be "damage control"

First shot across the bow....

JayAllan · 12-14-2009, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ManuteBol

Lighten up Francis.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 12-14-2009, 07:22 PM

I don't have any firsthand knowledge about the underage shooting allegations against Dirty D.

However, I did a Google search on "Kelsie Cummings" +"Dirty D" and this article from ******** came up:

Quote:

Kelsie Cummings writes me: When I was 17 I had a modeling portfolio on modelmayhem.com. A guy named Eric from 350 modeling told me he was an agent and he wanted to meet me. So I met him at a dunkin donuts in Holiday and he took me to a hotel saying I had to audition if I wanted to be in porn movies because I'd make tons of money.

I told him I was only 17 and he said it was ok because I was married. So I went and had sex with him for like 10minutes for the "audition". A few days later he called me and said he had a job for me. But he told me I needed to bring a friends i.d so they had it for their records.

I didn't think much of it and did as he said. Dirty D and Eric work together often. Eric ditched another friend of mine of at Dirty D's house once for videos. She was 20 though. anyhow, I went to dirty d's place and their was like 5 guys there including Dirty D. He asked me to fill out a model release with the information on the i.d. He never said he knew my age he just said "Fill this out with the information on the i.d you have"

so that made me think he knew I was just 17 and Eric must of told him the situation. He never asked me my d.o.b or my name or anything. He just told me to fill out the form with the info on the i.d i was told to bring with me.

I look nothing like the girl in the i.d. Anyways, I did fill out the form then they sat around for a few hours smoking weed before we began shooting. We did a solo scene at his home & then they took me to some Adult Video store down the road to film the second scene.

I started doing the scene and then I found out all the guys they were using were random men off the street & nobody was tested so I said I wanted to leave.

Dirty D and his friends kept trying to tell me I had to stay and finish because I agreed to do the scenes. I kept telling them no I couldn't do it. I went to walk out and Dirty D pulled me back by my arm and sat me on his lap.

He said it was normal to be nervous but everything was safe. I might of been nieve but no amount of money was ok for me to die of aids. I heard from others he was HIV positive and he shoots condomless all the time. So finally they let me call my husband and he came and got me.

I didn't get paid what I was supposed to and a few months ago somebody emailed me saying they knew I shot porn at 17 with a friends i.d and they were gonna have me arrested. The email was from [email protected] They emailed me asking me to do a shoot and I said no the pay was too low so they began threatening to turn me in for shooting.

Then your friend Patrick emailed me today asking questions. i just don't want to get in trouble for anything. I just did what I was told so I could make money to support my son. I was a teenage mom and young. I really had no clue at the time that I couldn't be in films. I can forward you the emails from 3xcasting if you want. I don't think it's Dirty D but it must be someone whose trying to back him up. I just didnt think i did anything wrong.

There is a subsequent short and carefully worded rebuttal statement released by Dirty D.

The video of the girl dubbed "Brandy" on the GloryHoleGirlz.com site was supposedly removed back when this story broke. I can see where some people might wonder why it was removed if in fact everything was legal.

When I did a search of "Gloryholegirlz" +"Brandy", lots of results popped up, meaning it is possible that the video is still floating around the internet. Anyway, I didn't bother clicking any further, given the potential nature of the content.

I'm not sure why a girl would make up a claim that could incriminate herself, but then again people have made false claims before, and Dirty D is still cruising free, so maybe what he says is true.

The one thing that IS clear to me, is that he sure is a magnet for controversy...whether it's from a girl claiming to have worked for him while underage, to former business partners talking negatively about his business practices, to an affiliate claiming that he was swindled out of payments.

Oh well, I guess the irony is that Dirty D is probably right now strolling around the deck of a cruise ship somewhere with not a worry in his head, totally oblivious to the drama continuing to unfold here at GFY (since according to him, his ship does not have internet access).

Sometimes not having an internet connection is a good thing...

ADG

MaximX · 12-14-2009, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

I don't have any firsthand knowledge about the underage shooting allegations against Dirty D.

However, I did a Google search on "Kelsie Cummings" +"Dirty D" and this article from ******** came up:

There is a subsequent short and carefully worded rebuttal statement released by Dirty D.

The video of the girl dubbed "Brandy" on the GloryHoleGirlz.com site was supposedly removed back when this story broke. I can see where some people might wonder why it was removed if in fact everything was legal.

When I did a search of "Gloryholegirlz" +"Brandy", lots of results popped up, meaning it is possible that the video is still floating around the internet. Anyway, I didn't bother clicking any further, given the potential nature of the content.

I'm not sure why a girl would make up a claim that could incriminate herself, but then again people have made false claims before, and Dirty D is still cruising free, so maybe what he says is true.

The one thing that IS clear to me, is that he sure is a magnet for controversy...whether it's from a girl claiming to have worked for him while underage, to former business partners talking negatively about his business practices, to an affiliate claiming that he was swindled out of payments.

Oh well, I guess the irony is that Dirty D is probably right now strolling around the deck of a cruise ship somewhere with not a worry in his head, totally oblivious to the drama continuing to unfold here at GFY (since according to him, his ship does not have internet access).

Sometimes not having an internet connection is a good thing...

ADG

Crazy article wow.

JenniDahling · 12-14-2009, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fmltube

Shooting an underage model is professional? Good one buddy. Friends of a feather......

Are you implying that Due shoots underage models as well?

I understand where Shoehorn and Dirty D are both coming from and have clearly pointed out that this is between them. They are both big boys and will handle things when DD gets back.

I don't know why you have such a vendetta against DD other than him ignoring your e-mails when you were looking for someone to pay you to shoot content.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fmltube

I wonder if Dirty D would be willing to take me under his wing since I am in the Tampa area. Ill have to hit him up.

Taking the word of Whore Monger aka "Cracker Jack" as well as other adult created "articles" about any other issue than the one at hand, then taking it further by implying that D is skirting the grey area with underage models, is a very serious accusation. Unless you have solid proof that is not generated from the hearsay circles (other adult boards), then I recommend you STFU about it. Let Shoehorn and DD work it out.

Insisting that Shoehorn gets paid is fine, many posters on here have taken that issue to heart and have run with it in other threads. Many of these folks actually have business in this industry as well as sites and established reputations. You are a no body with no site, who wants someone to buy you equipment then pay you to shoot. Good luck with that.

$5 submissions · 12-14-2009, 08:18 PM

The thread this thread references has more VIEWS than some webmaster forums COMBINED.

Due · 12-14-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

The one thing that IS clear to me, is that he sure is a magnet for controversy...whether it's from a girl claiming to have worked for him while underage, to former business partners talking negatively about his business practices, to an affiliate claiming that he was swindled out of payments.

I can totally agree to that, also it appears that rumors relied on is taken from a person who send a mail to someone who they may know that had a friend from where they heard a wild story. On top of that the best reference given in an article is to a gmail account and not any specific person.
Also I find it kind of odd he would supposedly shoot underage content without even trying to market a "teen site"
Maybe my logic is broken

I'm not commenting on previous partners, affiliates etc, just continued posting about supposedly underage models with no facts supporting the statements

Due · 12-14-2009, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

ADG

As I did not know about ******** I did a few searches and found this about ********

Quote:

Gene Ross (********) is a total suck up to anyone that pretends that Gene has a shread of jounalistic integrity left within his burned out shell - which he does not.

The guy basically writes press releases and serves as a hitman for the small cadre of suck ups that carry on as if he is anything in the industry anymore, while he lifts feeds and reprints them as "news" because he is too lazy to do actual news reporting.

How valid a source would you think ******** is ? Is the article you quoted trustworthy in your opinion ?

pocketkangaroo · 12-14-2009, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

I can totally agree to that, also it appears that rumors relied on is taken from a person who send a mail to someone who they may know that had a friend from where they heard a wild story. On top of that the best reference given in an article is to a gmail account and not any specific person.
Also I find it kind of odd he would supposedly shoot underage content without even trying to market a "teen site"
Maybe my logic is broken

I'm not commenting on previous partners, affiliates etc, just continued posting about supposedly underage models with no facts supporting the statements

I don't get what you want the mods to do. Someone mentioned an alleged incident. The article is here:

http://********.com/read.php?ID=31663

Now for an unsubstantiated rumor, Dirty D went ahead and wrote a response as well as removed the video and warned other companies to watch out for the girl. Something odd if you were certain it was unsubstantiated and had no merit.

It looks like a he said/she said situation. People will make their own judgements. When they factor in that the "he said" portion of that has angry business partners, unpaid affiliates, numerous other negative stories, and a police record, they probably don't come across as the most trustworthy of sources.

pocketkangaroo · 12-14-2009, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

How valid a source would you think ******** is ? Is the article you quoted trustworthy in your opinion ?

It was valid enough for Dirty D to remove the video, warn other companies of the model, and write a full response.

ShellyCrash · 12-14-2009, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

As I did not know about ******** I did a few searches and found this about ********

How valid a source would you think ******** is ? Is the article you quoted trustworthy in your opinion ?

I don't think he was trying to prove allegations as being true or prove they are based in fact. I think what ADG was saying is just that the articles and accusations are already out there, originating on other sites not the Shoehorn thread on GFY.

harvey · 12-14-2009, 10:01 PM

I didn't post in that thread, lot of trolling, bro-ism and stupidity even though it's a very simple matter and there's no other way to see it than the right way or the wrong way. Period.

I don't know if Dirty D shot underage content, although I've heard about the subject ADG posted, not only on boards (it was posted here as well) but I was told about it by persons close to that issue. In any case, it's a legal issue attaining other people, and I don't know what happened, so I'll keep my mouth shut. Maybe what Dirty D did after that thing shown up is a clue. Maybe not.

However, I don't understand why Due is defending D other than being his peep, I'd keep my mouth shut and let him fight his battles.

and then Jenni. I've no beef with you at all, you're a funny person and I kinda like you, however you're doing a terrible work as a PR person in this whole subject. Terrible. And your post in this thread shows a really unexpected lack of professionalism. I know D and Due are your clients, but if I was you, I'd think twice before speaking. In any case, since you seem unable to do a proper PR work in the HIGR thing, I'd follow your own advice: let DD and Shoehorn handle this.

Don't take it the wrong way, I'm telling you this because I like you. Of course, you can do what you want, but just my 2 cents

On a side note, it's amazing how bored is people in this board

Deej · 12-14-2009, 10:21 PM

HArvey!!!!!

harvey · 12-14-2009, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

HArvey!!!!!

hola!

Deej · 12-14-2009, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey

hola!

Buenas NOches Senior!

Que pasa Hombre

Due · 12-14-2009, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

It was valid enough for Dirty D to remove the video, warn other companies of the model, and write a full response.

So he removed content and issued a warning to others about potential problems with a specific model that apparently shoot a lot of content since there was the need to issue a warning ? If that make him guilty I see a potential instant kill of a lot of companies around. I heard a lot of funky stories about various models during my last at leats 12 years in this business.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

I don't think he was trying to prove allegations as being true or prove they are based in fact. I think what ADG was saying is just that the articles and accusations are already out there, originating on other sites not the Shoehorn thread on GFY.

Just because it's on the internet doesnt make it a fact, this forum have some pretty strict rules about this that appears to be set aside to increase sigviews (or mods is not paying attention, pick whatever is beneficial for you)
A models age is a very sour subject in this business, it IS the actual business. After I spoke up, I was put into the same "boat"
It just makes me wonder how far this will go.
Just for the records, I got nothing against ADG nor his posts, it's not him posting that stuff, also had the pleasure of meeting him and seing him at work which he is very good at!

digitaldivas · 12-14-2009, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

However......I don't see why Due would be the one to start a thread about it since it doesn't concern him in any way.

Because it's fucking annoying...

Due · 12-14-2009, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey

However, I don't understand why Due is defending D other than being his peep, I'd keep my mouth shut and let him fight his battles.

I posted not specifically to defend D but more based on the potential damage this could have on our industry when someone without any apparent proof can go on a rampage for days accusing someone of being an underage content shooter, when I posted about this I was put in the same boat. Is that the level this board is coming to ?

»Rob Content« · 12-14-2009, 10:45 PM

Due sure seems to be doing damage control.

Dirty D is taking a lot of heat, people are pulling links.

Due admits to being his processor.

1 + 1 = 2

I would think as a processor you should be as impartial and as far away from drama threads as possible. You never see Corvette, or RonC, or Mitch get involved.

Just makes me wonder why Due cares soo much and is fighting it soo much, minus that it could hurt his income....

As far as the story and situation in question. An accusation was made. The girl in question made statements, was interviewed, people picked up on the story and that was that.

It's up to D to clean up that mess, which it appears he tried to.

It's all posted for the public to read, and there is nothing wrong with linking off to an independent news source...

»Rob Content« · 12-14-2009, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

As I did not know about ******** I did a few searches and found this about ********

How valid a source would you think ******** is ? Is the article you quoted trustworthy in your opinion ?

So since someones opinion on Gene Ross and ******** is he's a suck up and not trustworthy we should take their opinion 100%, but if Gene says something we should not.

Kind of a pot kettle type situation. If you want to take one persons opinion, but not another.

»Rob Content« · 12-14-2009, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

I posted not specifically to defend D but more based on the potential damage this could have on our industry when someone without any apparent proof can go on a rampage for days accusing someone of being an underage content shooter, when I posted about this I was put in the same boat. Is that the level this board is coming to ?

It's the level this board has always worked at. Admit that you are just just trying to play clean up because D is not because this could effect your pockets. It's pretty clear.

The entire "for the good of the industry" deal... no one is going to buy it. Because if so you better put your cape and tights on and start patrolling all the boards because there are things said daily that can hurt our industry, not to mention what people say about us on non porn related boards. You better get a ton of super friends together if this is the battle you want to fight.

Unless you are just selecting this battle because it makes you money....

marketsmart · 12-14-2009, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

I posted not specifically to defend D but more based on the potential damage this could have on our industry when someone without any apparent proof can go on a rampage for days accusing someone of being an underage content shooter, when I posted about this I was put in the same boat. Is that the level this board is coming to ?

no you didnt... you posted a self serving thread to try to support your future wife...

while i can relate and understand your desire to support your girl, trying to disguise (poorly) your intent by masking it by your so called compassion toward this industry is both lame and foolish..

"when a man wishes to stay clean, he does not try to debate the different flavors of mud, he is smart enough to stay clear of the mud"..

i just made that up, so any further unauthorized use of that saying will violate my copyright...

Robbie · 12-14-2009, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

"when a man wishes to stay clean, he does not try to debate the different flavors of mud, he is smart enough to stay clear of the mud"..

i just made that up, so any further unauthorized use of that saying will violate my copyright...

GODDAMN!!!! I wish you had written that a week ago! Woulda saved me from crucifixion on here!

I'm gonna have to make that my new motto. No matter how pissed I get or passionate about a subject...I will refer to those words of wisdom and save myself from being trolled down to the ground.

12-14-2009, 04:51 PM	#1
Due Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Murrieta, CA Posts: 3,620	GFY mods what the hell ?? What the hell is going on here at the board ? There may be disputes between 2 parties but allowing people to openly accuse one party for shooting underage porn and shit like this is a completely different story, shit what the hell is this place turning into ? I don't mind anyone to hate on anyone, but this is turning out to be ridiculous and pathetic, at least keep the hate on a professional level __________________ I buy plugs Skype: Due_Global /Due

12-14-2009, 04:53 PM	#2
sicone Retired Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Sac Posts: 18,453	I must have missed that thread... __________________

12-14-2009, 05:04 PM	#8
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	It was a legitimate news posting... Your friend could have stopped it in the beginning by doing whats right and paid his affiliate.... Am I right? You can admit it... I mean were way past humility... A friend is a friend... A business is a business... __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

12-14-2009, 05:06 PM	#9
lagcam Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,892	If he was a good friend of mine, I would have told him to do the right thing over this whole stupid matter. Anyway, to your balls, for nailing your colours to that mast. __________________ Working Cam site for sale - NOT affiliate.

12-14-2009, 08:18 PM	#33
$5 submissions I help you SUCCEED Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas Posts: 32,195	The thread this thread references has more VIEWS than some webmaster forums COMBINED. __________________ Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video! For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants

12-14-2009, 04:55 PM	#5
AaronM Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: ┌∩┐ ◣_◢ ┌∩┐ Posts: 46,909	However......I don't see why Due would be the one to start a thread about it since it doesn't concern him in any way.

12-14-2009, 05:40 PM	#20
Adraco Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Location: Onboard an airplane around the globe Posts: 3,733	I don't know anything about who did what, and I stopped reading the thread after about 15 pages. Accusations are one thing, and can be quite serious, but at least in all the countries I do business, you are not guilty until proven otherwise. So for what it's worth, Dirty D seems to have screwed an affiliate out on a few hundred dollars. However he di or didn't shoot underaged models, well, just apply not guilty until proven otherwise.

12-14-2009, 05:42 PM	#21
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,289	I find it kind of interesting how involved totally unrelated parties can get in an issue that really doesn't involve them.

12-14-2009, 10:01 PM	#39
harvey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 9,266	I didn't post in that thread, lot of trolling, bro-ism and stupidity even though it's a very simple matter and there's no other way to see it than the right way or the wrong way. Period. I don't know if Dirty D shot underage content, although I've heard about the subject ADG posted, not only on boards (it was posted here as well) but I was told about it by persons close to that issue. In any case, it's a legal issue attaining other people, and I don't know what happened, so I'll keep my mouth shut. Maybe what Dirty D did after that thing shown up is a clue. Maybe not. However, I don't understand why Due is defending D other than being his peep, I'd keep my mouth shut and let him fight his battles. and then Jenni. I've no beef with you at all, you're a funny person and I kinda like you, however you're doing a terrible work as a PR person in this whole subject. Terrible. And your post in this thread shows a really unexpected lack of professionalism. I know D and Due are your clients, but if I was you, I'd think twice before speaking. In any case, since you seem unable to do a proper PR work in the HIGR thing, I'd follow your own advice: let DD and Shoehorn handle this. Don't take it the wrong way, I'm telling you this because I like you. Of course, you can do what you want, but just my 2 cents On a side note, it's amazing how bored is people in this board __________________ This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth

12-14-2009, 10:21 PM	#40
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	HArvey!!!!! __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

12-14-2009, 10:45 PM	#46
»Rob Content« Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 4,348	Due sure seems to be doing damage control. Dirty D is taking a lot of heat, people are pulling links. Due admits to being his processor. 1 + 1 = 2 I would think as a processor you should be as impartial and as far away from drama threads as possible. You never see Corvette, or RonC, or Mitch get involved. Just makes me wonder why Due cares soo much and is fighting it soo much, minus that it could hurt his income.... As far as the story and situation in question. An accusation was made. The girl in question made statements, was interviewed, people picked up on the story and that was that. It's up to D to clean up that mess, which it appears he tried to. It's all posted for the public to read, and there is nothing wrong with linking off to an independent news source... __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557 ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom