New Grounds for Proposed Regulation of Adult Websites Possible - GoFuckYourself.com

Redrob · 01-27-2010, 09:54 PM

See Dr. Marty Klein's comments in Tom Hymes' article on page 94 of the January AVN concerning the need for addressing the problem of boredom in marriage and the diversion given by erotica to the bored husbands. The "problem" is being used as a basis for justifying governmental regulation of the viewing of erotica by pro-censorship groups.

The pro-censor groups are trying to redefine the viewing of erotica as a "public health issue" to be regulated like tobacco usage. The proposed definitions enable everybody to win except the industry. The erotica watching husband becomes an "addict." The wife becomes a "victim." The sex therapist gets a fat check for treatment.

And, the adult industry gets a whole new round of governmental regulations...... I can see it now. Health warning on websites...."WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that the watching of this movie can cause excessive sweating, hair on palms, extreme myopia, and ejaculation."

The real problem as defined in the article is that after 8 years of marriage, the husband isn't turned on by his fat-assed, "not tonight-I have a headache" wife and wacks off rather than going around frustrated. This is really a marriage relationship issue. I think the excessive erotica watching is a symptom of a disfunctional marriage and not the cause.

Great article and we should all thank Tom Hymes for bringing this issue to our attention. The article goes into much more detail and better explains the need for alarm.

To address this "problem", perhaps, we should promote toys, stripper ware, sexy lingerie, better lotions, male herbal enhancements, and the like as ways the couple could reconnect and get a little lust back in their love life. Maybe develop some websites and marketing addressed to middle-aged, married wives who want to "sex up" themselves.

Do yourself a favor and take a moment and find a copy of the article or download the January issue from AVN.com.

epitome · 01-27-2010, 10:00 PM

Three words: first amendment rights

Redrob · 01-27-2010, 10:03 PM

The article points out that first amendment protections don't apply in the case of protecting consumers from dangerous products.

dav3 · 01-27-2010, 10:14 PM

Weird that something that causes 'danger' goes from being a 'verifiable fact' to just someone's 'biased opinion'.

_Richard_ · 01-27-2010, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

The article points out that first amendment protections don't apply in the case of protecting consumers from dangerous products.

hasn't been a problem for the sex trade..

fuzebox · 01-27-2010, 11:11 PM

Must suck to be american.

I love being unregulatable.

Waddymelon · 01-27-2010, 11:13 PM

Every day, the sky is falling.

baddog · 01-27-2010, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waddymelon

Every day, the sky is falling.

Barefootsies · 01-27-2010, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dav3

Weird that something that causes 'danger' goes from being a 'verifiable fact' to just someone's 'biased opinion'.

Well said.

Redrob · 01-28-2010, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waddymelon

Every day, the sky is falling.

Nobody said "the sky is falling."

The point of the post was to point out a potential societal problem and some relevant research. Nothing more.

I try and give you a heads up to some serious discussion of an issue BEFORE there are proposed regulations and you want to make light of the issue.

I have found that adult entertainment industry members that ignore public opinion will be crying the loudest for someone to save them when (and if) the hammer drops.

Ignorance and passivity should never be an option when dealing with pro-censorship groups.

Fletch XXX · 01-28-2010, 07:08 AM

who fucing cares what some religious pricks think? they wont win this is simple case of a publication getting their viewers riled up, its no different than the bible thumpers thumping their bible for action. But hey, get your subsription NOW BUY NOW!!!

fuck fear mongers.

Dirty Dane · 01-28-2010, 07:15 AM

lol making a "health warning" on the website will definitively not stop bored husbands from clicking Enter.

Redrob · 01-28-2010, 07:16 AM

No Fear........just knowledge.

Go Fuck Yourself

Fletch XXX · 01-28-2010, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob

No Fear........just knowledge.

Go Fuck Yourself

No, most of us consider this stuff like Dr Phil warning us about "out of control teens."

AtlantisCash · 01-28-2010, 07:30 AM

"the husband isn't turned on by his fat-assed, "not tonight-I have a headache"
wife and wacks off rather than going around frustrated. This is really a marriage relationship issue. I think the excessive erotica watching is a symptom
of a disfunctional marriage and not the cause."

This part of article sums it up, some people always need an excuse to put the blame on something, rather then watch out themselfs on the mirror.

01-27-2010, 09:54 PM	#1
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	New Grounds for Proposed Regulation of Adult Websites Possible See Dr. Marty Klein's comments in Tom Hymes' article on page 94 of the January AVN concerning the need for addressing the problem of boredom in marriage and the diversion given by erotica to the bored husbands. The "problem" is being used as a basis for justifying governmental regulation of the viewing of erotica by pro-censorship groups. The pro-censor groups are trying to redefine the viewing of erotica as a "public health issue" to be regulated like tobacco usage. The proposed definitions enable everybody to win except the industry. The erotica watching husband becomes an "addict." The wife becomes a "victim." The sex therapist gets a fat check for treatment. And, the adult industry gets a whole new round of governmental regulations...... I can see it now. Health warning on websites...."WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined that the watching of this movie can cause excessive sweating, hair on palms, extreme myopia, and ejaculation." The real problem as defined in the article is that after 8 years of marriage, the husband isn't turned on by his fat-assed, "not tonight-I have a headache" wife and wacks off rather than going around frustrated. This is really a marriage relationship issue. I think the excessive erotica watching is a symptom of a disfunctional marriage and not the cause. Great article and we should all thank Tom Hymes for bringing this issue to our attention. The article goes into much more detail and better explains the need for alarm. To address this "problem", perhaps, we should promote toys, stripper ware, sexy lingerie, better lotions, male herbal enhancements, and the like as ways the couple could reconnect and get a little lust back in their love life. Maybe develop some websites and marketing addressed to middle-aged, married wives who want to "sex up" themselves. Do yourself a favor and take a moment and find a copy of the article or download the January issue from AVN.com. Last edited by Redrob; 01-27-2010 at 10:00 PM..

01-27-2010, 10:14 PM	#4
dav3 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,348	Weird that something that causes 'danger' goes from being a 'verifiable fact' to just someone's 'biased opinion'. __________________ Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

01-28-2010, 07:08 AM	#11
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	who fucing cares what some religious pricks think? they wont win this is simple case of a publication getting their viewers riled up, its no different than the bible thumpers thumping their bible for action. But hey, get your subsription NOW BUY NOW!!! fuck fear mongers. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

01-27-2010, 10:00 PM	#2
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	Three words: first amendment rights

01-27-2010, 10:03 PM	#3
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	The article points out that first amendment protections don't apply in the case of protecting consumers from dangerous products.

01-27-2010, 11:11 PM	#6
fuzebox making it rain Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: seattle Posts: 22,111	Must suck to be american. I love being unregulatable.

01-27-2010, 11:13 PM	#7
Waddymelon So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: The Whitehouse Posts: 17,349	Every day, the sky is falling.

01-28-2010, 07:15 AM	#12
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	lol making a "health warning" on the website will definitively not stop bored husbands from clicking Enter.

01-28-2010, 07:16 AM	#13
Redrob Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks. Posts: 4,791	No Fear........just knowledge. Go Fuck Yourself

01-28-2010, 07:30 AM	#15
AtlantisCash Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Istanbul - Turkiye Posts: 3,179	"the husband isn't turned on by his fat-assed, "not tonight-I have a headache" wife and wacks off rather than going around frustrated. This is really a marriage relationship issue. I think the excessive erotica watching is a symptom of a disfunctional marriage and not the cause." This part of article sums it up, some people always need an excuse to put the blame on something, rather then watch out themselfs on the mirror.