Airport Security Officials Caught in Most Obvious Lie Ever - GoFuckYourself.com

onwebcam · 02-10-2010, 10:52 AM

"Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan made headlines over the weekend when he caught airport employees at Heathrow passing around printouts of his naked body, as revealed by full-body security scans.

?I saw these girls ? they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said ?give them to me? ? and you could see everything inside,? he said on British television last Friday. ?So I autographed them for them.?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/airport-...-lie-ever.html

"Heathrow Airport?s denial that Indian film star Shahrukh Khan?s naked body scanner images were printed and circulated by airport staff because the devices have no capability to print or distribute images contradicts leaked government documents that prove the x-ray backscatter machines do have the option to store and send images, as well as actual images of the print outs that are freely available on the Internet.

Heathrow today denied that naked body scanner images of Khan were printed and circulated by airport security staff, telling the London Telegraph the claims were ?completely factually incorrect? because the body-scanning equipment had no capability to print images.

The BAA spokeswoman ?stressed that images captured by the equipment could not be stored or distributed in any form?.

Heathrow are trying to avoid any investigation into the incident by claiming it ?simply could not be true?.

However, leaked government documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and confirmed as authentic by CNN show that the devices must have the ability to store and send images when in ?test mode.?

?That requirement leaves open the possibility the machines ? which can see beneath people?s clothing ? can be abused by TSA insiders and hacked by outsiders, said EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg,? according to the report.

?If you look at the actual technical specifications and you read the vendor contracts, you come to understand that these machines are capable of doing far more than the TSA has let on,? added Rotenberg.

Indeed, if there is no capability for the devices to save, distribute and print images, then how on earth have news organizations obtained print outs of such images like the one below?"

http://www.prisonplanet.com/scannerg...e-printed.html

_Richard_ · 02-10-2010, 10:55 AM

“I saw these girls — they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said ‘give them to me’ — and you could see everything inside,” he said on British television last Friday. “So I autographed them for them.”

hahahahaha

pornask · 02-10-2010, 11:02 AM

Why would anyone want a printout of some Indian guy? Fucking gross

GatorB · 02-10-2010, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornask

Why would anyone want a printout of some Indian guy? Fucking gross

Why do all these white girls in porn do gangbangs with 5,6 or more of the nastiest n1ggers I've seen?

L-Pink · 02-10-2010, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Why do all these white girls in porn do gangbangs with 5,6 or more of the nastiest n1ggers I've seen?

.

Iron Fist · 02-10-2010, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Why do all these white girls in porn do gangbangs with 5,6 or more of the nastiest n1ggers I've seen?

Because they're paid to do it... how hard is that to figure out. I've seen crackwhore hookers do unspeakable things for money... porn is no different.

This whole story is fake... as if some guy demanding to see what they were looking at, and then they just hand it over? Please.... you raise your voice in a secure area at an airport and you'll get fucking tased. Just a PR stunt and that site is in on the joke.

onwebcam · 02-10-2010, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead

Because they're paid to do it... how hard is that to figure out. I've seen crackwhore hookers do unspeakable things for money... porn is no different.

This whole story is fake... as if some guy demanding to see what they were looking at, and then they just hand it over? Please.... you raise your voice in a secure area at an airport and you'll get fucking tased. Just a PR stunt and that site is in on the joke.

Come the fuck on man. Do you really think there is "no way" for them to be able to store and print the images?

You're the fucking joke if you believe that especially being in the IT field. Maybe you need a change in your line of work.. Airport security perhaps?

Sarah_Jayne · 02-10-2010, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornask

Why would anyone want a printout of some Indian guy? Fucking gross

Oh, I dunno..a country full of female Bollywood fans?

02-10-2010, 10:52 AM	#1
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,652	Airport Security Officials Caught in Most Obvious Lie Ever "Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan made headlines over the weekend when he caught airport employees at Heathrow passing around printouts of his naked body, as revealed by full-body security scans. ?I saw these girls ? they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said ?give them to me? ? and you could see everything inside,? he said on British television last Friday. ?So I autographed them for them.? http://www.prisonplanet.com/airport-...-lie-ever.html "Heathrow Airport?s denial that Indian film star Shahrukh Khan?s naked body scanner images were printed and circulated by airport staff because the devices have no capability to print or distribute images contradicts leaked government documents that prove the x-ray backscatter machines do have the option to store and send images, as well as actual images of the print outs that are freely available on the Internet. Heathrow today denied that naked body scanner images of Khan were printed and circulated by airport security staff, telling the London Telegraph the claims were ?completely factually incorrect? because the body-scanning equipment had no capability to print images. The BAA spokeswoman ?stressed that images captured by the equipment could not be stored or distributed in any form?. Heathrow are trying to avoid any investigation into the incident by claiming it ?simply could not be true?. However, leaked government documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center and confirmed as authentic by CNN show that the devices must have the ability to store and send images when in ?test mode.? ?That requirement leaves open the possibility the machines ? which can see beneath people?s clothing ? can be abused by TSA insiders and hacked by outsiders, said EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg,? according to the report. ?If you look at the actual technical specifications and you read the vendor contracts, you come to understand that these machines are capable of doing far more than the TSA has let on,? added Rotenberg. Indeed, if there is no capability for the devices to save, distribute and print images, then how on earth have news organizations obtained print outs of such images like the one below?" http://www.prisonplanet.com/scannerg...e-printed.html __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

02-10-2010, 10:55 AM	#2
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver Posts: 30,986	“I saw these girls — they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said ‘give them to me’ — and you could see everything inside,” he said on British television last Friday. “So I autographed them for them.” hahahahaha

02-10-2010, 11:02 AM	#3
pornask So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: 253-233-241 Posts: 6,518	Why would anyone want a printout of some Indian guy? Fucking gross