Being Prosecuted for Kiddie Porn Even Though Images are of Adult Performers - GoFuckYourself.com

pornlaw · 03-11-2010, 01:41 PM

From ********.com -- http://www.********.com/read.php?ID=40543

Can anyone confirm this ? Anyone in Virginia hear about this case ? I havent seen this make any kind of news...

Quote:

John Ervin writes me: Please read ALL of this BEFORE making any decisions.
I am currently fighting 29 counts of child pornography charges in the state
of Virginia.

As of today, 20 of the 29 charges have been dismissed - BECAUSE THEY WERE
CONFIRMED TO BE ADULT PERFORMERS.

9 charges remain, 7 of these have been identified as ADULT performers - even after presenting 18USC2257 releases, and copies of the ID's of the
performers and even sworn written testimony from 1 of them, and copies of current drivers license.

The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges.

5 of the photos from an individual from Arizona (currently alive and has
been contacted), 1 photo is from England (dates back to the early 90's) - this is from The Score group in Florida; 1 from an adult actor from Poland - passport is from 1999.. Anna Marek is the stage name.

Subpoena's have been issued for the two companies from Florida, and the
individual from Arizona to come to Virginia to testify.

All three are refusing to come here to testify. It is likely a warrant will
be issued for their arrest, and they be brought here. 2 charges are unknown at this time. I would like to identify the remaining
two charges.

MaDalton · 03-11-2010, 01:43 PM

you have a funny law system if thats true

PenisFace · 03-11-2010, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

you have a funny law system if thats true

No shit, jesus christ! "YOU'RE GUILTY OF CRIMES YOU DIDNT COMMIT LMAO HAVE FUN IN PRISON FAGGOT".

Edit: *Judge praises allegiance to a piece of fabric, spanks his kids for using the lords name in vain, hates homosexuals*

JFK · 03-11-2010, 01:48 PM

"The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges."
wonder why ??

Press Release Pro · 03-11-2010, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

"The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges."
wonder why ??

Obviously because they are not a 2257safe customer

96ukssob · 03-11-2010, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

"The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges."
wonder why ??

there has to be something else to it than this

marketsmart · 03-11-2010, 03:07 PM

this is why:

http://trewthe.wordpress.com/2007/09...as-child-porn/

i have heard.. dont know if true or not, but this is very similar scenario to dirty d... (if you believe dirty d didnt know the girl was underage (if she was at the time))

.

frank7799 · 03-11-2010, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

you have a funny law system if thats true

It has already come abroad.

CosmicTang · 03-11-2010, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

this is why:

http://trewthe.wordpress.com/2007/09...as-child-porn/

"In 1998, an Internet User known by the alias "Bile", posted thousands of copyrighted COLOR CLIMAX works to Usenet News.

After numerous warnings from the COLOR CLIMAX Legal Department and their outside lawyers, COLOR CLIMAX sued "Bile" in the U.S. District Court in New York.

"Bile's" response was the following:

"You have no idea who you are fucking with. I suggest you take that little lawsuit and run."

The more things change the more they stay the same.

PornMD · 03-11-2010, 03:58 PM

Quote:

9 charges remain, 7 of these have been identified as ADULT performers - even after presenting 18USC2257 releases, and copies of the ID's of the
performers and even sworn written testimony from 1 of them, and copies of current drivers license.

Is anyone else but me wondering why he explains away all but 2 of these charges?

dyna mo · 03-11-2010, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

Is anyone else but me wondering why he explains away all but 2 of these charges?

i'm wondering about the whole story actually.

seeric · 03-11-2010, 04:16 PM

no wonder. look at some of the names of those titles on one of the sites that blog links to. fucking guy is begging to be prosecuted.

Pics Traffic · 03-11-2010, 04:41 PM

This is really fucked up.

pornlaw · 03-11-2010, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

this is why:

http://trewthe.wordpress.com/2007/09...as-child-porn/

i have heard.. dont know if true or not, but this is very similar scenario to dirty d... (if you believe dirty d didnt know the girl was underage (if she was at the time))

.

Thanks for the link. Interesting read and a lot like Dirty D's case.

NaughtyVisions · 03-11-2010, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Ervin

9 charges remain, 7 of these have been identified as ADULT performers - even after presenting 18USC2257 releases, and copies of the ID's of the
performers and even sworn written testimony from 1 of them, and copies of current drivers license.

The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges.

Seems like someone doesn't even know how much they are charged with.

Kelli58 · 03-11-2010, 07:21 PM

This should serve as a very strong reminder to everyone right now to review your 2257 docs and make sure they are in order.

PornMD · 03-12-2010, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions

Seems like someone doesn't even know how much they are charged with.

No, if you read further, the quote mentions that 7 of those charges are in cases when the performer was clearly adult and he was referring to those 2 charges. My reply was that he conspicuously left out anything about the other 2 charges, which seems rather odd.

The Duck · 03-12-2010, 04:50 AM

Messed up. But we don't know the full story.

Longboat full of Vikings · 03-12-2010, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Press Release Pro

Obviously because they are not a 2257safe customer

03-11-2010, 01:43 PM	#2
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,822	you have a funny law system if thats true __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

03-11-2010, 01:48 PM	#4
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,374	"The prosecution will NOT drop these 7 charges." wonder why ?? __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

03-11-2010, 03:07 PM	#7
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	this is why: http://trewthe.wordpress.com/2007/09...as-child-porn/ i have heard.. dont know if true or not, but this is very similar scenario to dirty d... (if you believe dirty d didnt know the girl was underage (if she was at the time)) . Last edited by marketsmart; 03-11-2010 at 03:08 PM..

03-11-2010, 07:21 PM	#16
Kelli58 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 2,093	This should serve as a very strong reminder to everyone right now to review your 2257 docs and make sure they are in order. __________________ Kandy AI 🍭🍬 Take a bite out of censorship 🍭🍬 We believe in empowering adults to use AI as they see fit. 👉 Get AI to write your scene descriptions for you 👈

03-12-2010, 04:50 AM	#18
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	Messed up. But we don't know the full story. __________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

03-11-2010, 04:16 PM	#12
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	no wonder. look at some of the names of those titles on one of the sites that blog links to. fucking guy is begging to be prosecuted.

03-11-2010, 04:41 PM	#13
Pics Traffic Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Europe Posts: 3,055	This is really fucked up.