![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
|
![]() Is ram, bandwidth, memory, and data transfer all the same thing?
__________________
High Performance Vps $10 Linode Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden/Spain you sum bitch!
Posts: 6,576
|
ram = memory
bandwidth usage = amount of used traffic, f.ex 330gb (which is about one mbit constant for a month) |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Unregistered Abuser
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,547
|
your hardrive stores your ram and the bandwidth is like the ozone layer
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,382
|
Here's some useful questions...
With dedicated servers, how do you know when you need hardware upgrades? How to differentiate server speed vs speed of your network's bandwidth? How do you know the difference between needing more RAM, or maybe a faster processor? What percent of memory do you want free during peak or average usage times? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
High Performance Vps $10 Linode Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
So Fucking Lame
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 12,156
|
Quote:
As for processor, I don't know ... but my general rule of thumb is to double RAM one and then if your sites slow, upgrade to a better server. I don't even know if that's the right thing to do but it works great for me. For the third question, I don't know ... but your sites should be fast. Use webwait.com. If your site takes more than 3 seconds to load then it's too slow and you may be losing surfers. If you're running a blog and it's slow, kill plugins and it will drastically improve. I got a blog down from 7 to 2 by doing that. 3 seconds is the worst you want, try to keep it under 2 seconds. It it totally possible to get it under 1 second but you're typically not going to lose surfers if it's under 3. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
|
ok. got that. how do you choose the right amount of each? Im assuming its all based on traffic and what they do while on your site.
__________________
High Performance Vps $10 Linode Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
Quote:
As far as how much RAM to get, more is better. You can not have enough, but it is difficult to have too much. If you have a 32 bit OS then you can start with 1, but if you have 64 bit, you had better have two. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aruba
Posts: 1,932
|
dumbass.
well you asked for it.
__________________
We Sell Domains | ThumbLords | ICQ 128106905 | TubeLords | Traffic Holder | eRoken |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
Bandwidth is NOT the same as transfer.
Bandwidth is the size of the link that your data goes through. Transfer is how much data you've actually transferred through that link. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Choice is an Illusion
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
►SouthOfHeaven
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
|
![]() ![]() bandwidth = "flow rate" of data transfer data transfer = amount of data transferred
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
|
Quote:
These things are fairly easy for a system administrator, but based on your posts I think you'd need a sysadmin to check for you. The main tools are ssh, iostat, iotop, and top. Most of the time, you don't actually NEED hardware upgrades, except if you run out of disk space. Most of the time, you can instead choose to have a qualified person make a few configuration changes so you're not wasting the capacity you already have. On a typical web server we can reduce load by about 70% by simply using a few correct settings. With most web hosts, the person you talk does is not what I mean by a qualified admin. large hosts employ one or two people who really know what they are doing, plus a bunch of people who have risen to the level of their incompetence. Small hosts normally do not have a truly qualified sysadmin on staff, and instead call us or someone else as needed, if they are forced to do so. With modern processor speeds, most sites will be fine with any recent processor. If you are overloading your CPU, it's almost always because of some really dumb MySQL/PHP, where a PHP script is abusing the hell out of MySQL. Best to fix the script. More RAM is always better. Linux will find ways to make use of any RAM you give it. You want a minimum of a GB. 4GB will handle most sites. If you need more than 4GB, your site is large enough for you to call us and have us take a look at your actual system.
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current: support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627 Strongbox - The next generation in site security Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 2,785
|
dumbass! :P
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
►SouthOfHeaven
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Sick Fuck
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
So Fucking Outlawed
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,114
|
RAM
![]()
__________________
ICQ 115433750 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
|
Quote:
written queries which run often, and only if you don't mind "wasting" money paying for unused hardware. Why? Because two servers doubles the chance of failure. Say a single server has a 15% of hardware failure taking down the site this year. Add another required server and that roughly doubles the chance of a hardware failure taking down your site because now you are down if EITHER fails. Instead of a 15% (once every six years), it's now a 30% chance, or once every 3 years. Security wise, multiple servers can either double the chance of being hacked, or can greatly reduce the damage caused by a hack. That depends entirely on the expertise of the person setting them up. 95% of the time, doubling the amount of hardware simply doubles your exposure. Over the next couple of years we plan to put together a framework to fully leverage the power of a properly designed redundant cluster, where each server is more secure because it's locked down to only doing it's assigned tasks, and each is optimized for the tasks it performs. It IS possible, but more often than not it's done backwards - reducing overall performance and increasing exposure to risk. One perfect example of how it's often done wrong is that often people set up one server doing MySQL only and the other server doing everything else, primarily serving pics and videos on the web site, and they expect better performance. In fact, that's a performance killer and a waste of money. The SQL server uses the CPU, with minimal disk access - virtually no disk access if it has enough RAM. On the other hand, the web server, spitting out video files, loads the disk and uses almost no CPU. Splitting the two onto separate servers doesn't reduce overall load at all - it just means you now have one server that's CPU bound with an idle hard drive and another server that's drive bound with an idle CPU - waste. Putting them on the same server allows MySQL to use the CPU and Apache to use the disk, perfectly complimenting each other. Plus, on the same server Apache can more efficiently communicate with MySQL. On separate servers, all SQL queries have to be marshalled across the network, creating wasteful load on both machines. Performance wise, splitting them to separate servers has a significant cost which is justified only if you HAVE to, or if you're going to carefully optimize the hardware for each. (Example - one small, super fast SSD for the MySQL, and an array of large slow drives to store all of the web content.)
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current: support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627 Strongbox - The next generation in site security Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Webmaster
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: BP4L - NL/RO
Posts: 16,572
|
was certainly not a stupid question!
__________________
Enroll in the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program and get 9 free quality linkbacks from my network! ![]() Wanna see how old school I am? Look at this! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
ICQ:649699063
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,763
|
Bandwidth would be the MBs people are uploading from the site.
Let's say you have a picture on your site that is 1MB. Let's say five people go to your site and they each view the picture once. This means your bandwidth is 5MB.
__________________
Send me an email: [email protected] |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |