Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 03-17-2010, 09:16 PM   #1
tonyparra
Confirmed User
 
tonyparra's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
Call me a dumbass. Someone please explain hosting for me. Thanks.

Is ram, bandwidth, memory, and data transfer all the same thing?
__________________

High Performance Vps $10 Linode
Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot
tonyparra is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:18 PM   #2
chupachups
Confirmed User
 
chupachups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sweden/Spain you sum bitch!
Posts: 6,576
ram = memory
bandwidth usage = amount of used traffic, f.ex 330gb (which is about one mbit constant for a month)
__________________
chupachups is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:22 PM   #3
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyparra View Post
Is ram, bandwidth, memory, and data transfer all the same thing?
ram = memory
bandwidth = data transfer
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:23 PM   #4
papill0n
Unregistered Abuser
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,547
your hardrive stores your ram and the bandwidth is like the ozone layer
papill0n is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:45 PM   #5
kush
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,382
Here's some useful questions...

With dedicated servers, how do you know when you need hardware upgrades? How to differentiate server speed vs speed of your network's bandwidth?

How do you know the difference between needing more RAM, or maybe a faster processor?

What percent of memory do you want free during peak or average usage times?

Last edited by kush; 03-17-2010 at 09:47 PM..
kush is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:21 PM   #6
tonyparra
Confirmed User
 
tonyparra's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by kush View Post
Here's some useful questions...

With dedicated servers, how do you know when you need hardware upgrades? How to differentiate server speed vs speed of your network's bandwidth?

How do you know the difference between needing more RAM, or maybe a faster processor?

What percent of memory do you want free during peak or average usage times?
__________________

High Performance Vps $10 Linode
Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot
tonyparra is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:28 PM   #7
epitome
So Fucking Lame
 
epitome's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 12,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by kush View Post
Here's some useful questions...

With dedicated servers, how do you know when you need hardware upgrades? How to differentiate server speed vs speed of your network's bandwidth?

How do you know the difference between needing more RAM, or maybe a faster processor?

What percent of memory do you want free during peak or average usage times?
Slow sites = memory upgrade...it's almost certain not to be the network unless you're using some two bit host.

As for processor, I don't know ... but my general rule of thumb is to double RAM one and then if your sites slow, upgrade to a better server. I don't even know if that's the right thing to do but it works great for me.

For the third question, I don't know ... but your sites should be fast.

Use webwait.com. If your site takes more than 3 seconds to load then it's too slow and you may be losing surfers. If you're running a blog and it's slow, kill plugins and it will drastically improve. I got a blog down from 7 to 2 by doing that. 3 seconds is the worst you want, try to keep it under 2 seconds. It it totally possible to get it under 1 second but you're typically not going to lose surfers if it's under 3.
epitome is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:36 PM   #8
tonyparra
Confirmed User
 
tonyparra's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In your back seat with duck tape
Posts: 4,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog View Post
ram = memory
bandwidth = data transfer
ok. got that. how do you choose the right amount of each? Im assuming its all based on traffic and what they do while on your site.
__________________

High Performance Vps $10 Linode
Manage your Digital Ocean, Linode, or Favorite Cloud Server. Simple, fast, and secure Server Pilot
tonyparra is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:27 AM   #9
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyparra View Post
ok. got that. how do you choose the right amount of each? Im assuming its all based on traffic and what they do while on your site.
Well, the bandwidth is going to be determined by what kind of site you have, how many people are visiting and how long they are staying.

As far as how much RAM to get, more is better. You can not have enough, but it is difficult to have too much. If you have a 32 bit OS then you can start with 1, but if you have 64 bit, you had better have two.
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 06:14 AM   #10
ThumbLord
Confirmed User
 
ThumbLord's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Aruba
Posts: 1,932
dumbass.

well you asked for it.
__________________
We Sell Domains | ThumbLords | ICQ 128106905 | TubeLords | Traffic Holder | eRoken
ThumbLord is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 06:43 AM   #11
rowan
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
Bandwidth is NOT the same as transfer.

Bandwidth is the size of the link that your data goes through.

Transfer is how much data you've actually transferred through that link.
rowan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 06:44 AM   #12
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635
:2cents

Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome View Post
Slow sites = memory upgrade...it's almost certain not to be the network unless you're using some two bit host.

As for processor, I don't know ... but my general rule of thumb is to double RAM one and then if your sites slow, upgrade to a better server. I don't even know if that's the right thing to do but it works great for me.

For the third question, I don't know ... but your sites should be fast.

Use webwait.com. If your site takes more than 3 seconds to load then it's too slow and you may be losing surfers. If you're running a blog and it's slow, kill plugins and it will drastically improve. I got a blog down from 7 to 2 by doing that. 3 seconds is the worst you want, try to keep it under 2 seconds. It it totally possible to get it under 1 second but you're typically not going to lose surfers if it's under 3.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 09:27 AM   #13
kush
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome View Post
Slow sites = memory upgrade...it's almost certain not to be the network unless you're using some two bit host.

As for processor, I don't know ... but my general rule of thumb is to double RAM one and then if your sites slow, upgrade to a better server. I don't even know if that's the right thing to do but it works great for me.

For the third question, I don't know ... but your sites should be fast.

Use webwait.com. If your site takes more than 3 seconds to load then it's too slow and you may be losing surfers. If you're running a blog and it's slow, kill plugins and it will drastically improve. I got a blog down from 7 to 2 by doing that. 3 seconds is the worst you want, try to keep it under 2 seconds. It it totally possible to get it under 1 second but you're typically not going to lose surfers if it's under 3.
Good logical info, thanks!
kush is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 09:58 AM   #14
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog View Post
bandwidth = data transfer
bandwidth != data transfer

bandwidth = "flow rate" of data transfer

data transfer = amount of data transferred
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 10:17 AM   #15
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear View Post
bandwidth != data transfer

bandwidth = "flow rate" of data transfer

data transfer = amount of data transferred
I felt for purposes of his question it would be easier for him to relate.
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 10:42 AM   #16
raymor
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by kush View Post
Here's some useful questions...

With dedicated servers, how do you know when you need hardware upgrades? How to differentiate server speed vs speed of your network's bandwidth?

How do you know the difference between needing more RAM, or maybe a faster processor?

What percent of memory do you want free during peak or average usage times?
There are ways to tell exactly what your problems are and what needs to be done to fix them.
These things are fairly easy for a system administrator, but based on your posts I think you'd
need a sysadmin to check for you. The main tools are ssh, iostat, iotop, and top.

Most of the time, you don't actually NEED hardware upgrades, except if you run out of disk space.
Most of the time, you can instead choose to have a qualified person make a few configuration
changes so you're not wasting the capacity you already have. On a typical web server we can
reduce load by about 70% by simply using a few correct settings.
With most web hosts, the person you talk does is not what I mean by a qualified admin.
large hosts employ one or two people who really know what they are doing, plus a bunch of
people who have risen to the level of their incompetence. Small hosts normally do not have
a truly qualified sysadmin on staff, and instead call us or someone else as needed, if they
are forced to do so.

With modern processor speeds, most sites will be fine with any recent processor.
If you are overloading your CPU, it's almost always because of some really dumb MySQL/PHP,
where a PHP script is abusing the hell out of MySQL. Best to fix the script. More RAM is always
better. Linux will find ways to make use of any RAM you give it. You want a minimum of a GB.
4GB will handle most sites. If you need more than 4GB, your site is large enough for you to call
us and have us take a look at your actual system.
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids
raymor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 11:10 AM   #17
Robocrop
Confirmed User
 
Robocrop's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 2,785
dumbass! :P
Robocrop is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 11:16 AM   #18
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog View Post
I felt for purposes of his question it would be easier for him to relate.
granted he didn't know the difference between ram and bandwidth your explanation may have been better
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 11:31 AM   #19
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by raymor View Post
With modern processor speeds, most sites will be fine with any recent processor.
If you are overloading your CPU, it's almost always because of some really dumb MySQL/PHP, where a PHP script is abusing the hell out of MySQL. Best to fix the script. More RAM is always better.
Remote or dedicated SQL server is also a good idea if websites and scripts depend heavily on it. Also for security reasons. + external CDN reduce loads, especially if you have bigger files.

Last edited by Dirty Dane; 03-18-2010 at 11:34 AM..
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:29 PM   #20
KRosh
So Fucking Outlawed
 
KRosh's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,114
RAM

__________________
ICQ 115433750
KRosh is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 01:13 PM   #21
raymor
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane View Post
Remote or dedicated SQL server is also a good idea if websites and scripts depend heavily on it. Also for security reasons. + external CDN reduce loads, especially if you have bigger files.
Only IF the traffic and load justifies it, after optimizing settings and identifying any really poorly
written queries which run often, and only if you don't mind "wasting" money paying for unused
hardware. Why? Because two servers doubles the chance of failure. Say a single server has
a 15% of hardware failure taking down the site this year. Add another required server and
that roughly doubles the chance of a hardware failure taking down your site because now you
are down if EITHER fails. Instead of a 15% (once every six years), it's now a 30% chance, or
once every 3 years.

Security wise, multiple servers can either double the chance of being hacked, or can greatly
reduce the damage caused by a hack. That depends entirely on the expertise of the person
setting them up. 95% of the time, doubling the amount of hardware simply doubles your
exposure.

Over the next couple of years we plan to put together a framework to fully leverage the power
of a properly designed redundant cluster, where each server is more secure because
it's locked down to only doing it's assigned tasks, and each is optimized for the tasks it
performs. It IS possible, but more often than not it's done backwards - reducing overall
performance and increasing exposure to risk.

One perfect example of how it's often done wrong is that often people set up one server doing MySQL only and the other server doing everything else, primarily serving pics and videos on
the web site, and they expect better performance. In fact, that's a performance killer and a
waste of money. The SQL server uses the CPU, with minimal disk access - virtually no disk
access if it has enough RAM. On the other hand, the web server, spitting out video files,
loads the disk and uses almost no CPU. Splitting the two onto separate servers doesn't
reduce overall load at all - it just means you now have one server that's CPU bound with
an idle hard drive and another server that's drive bound with an idle CPU - waste. Putting
them on the same server allows MySQL to use the CPU and Apache to use the disk, perfectly
complimenting each other. Plus, on the same server Apache can more efficiently communicate
with MySQL. On separate servers, all SQL queries have to be marshalled across the network,
creating wasteful load on both machines. Performance wise, splitting them to separate servers
has a significant cost which is justified only if you HAVE to, or if you're going to carefully optimize
the hardware for each. (Example - one small, super fast SSD for the MySQL, and an array of
large slow drives to store all of the web content.)
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids
raymor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 01:16 PM   #22
Tjeezers
Webmaster
 
Tjeezers's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: BP4L - NL/RO
Posts: 16,572
was certainly not a stupid question!
__________________
Enroll in the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program and get 9 free quality linkbacks from my network!
Wanna see how old school I am? Look at this! All my Cam Review Sites are here!
Tjeezers is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2010, 01:30 PM   #23
fatfoo
ICQ:649699063
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,763
Bandwidth would be the MBs people are uploading from the site.

Let's say you have a picture on your site that is 1MB.

Let's say five people go to your site and they each view the picture once.

This means your bandwidth is 5MB.
__________________
Send me an email: [email protected]

Last edited by fatfoo; 03-19-2010 at 01:31 PM..
fatfoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.