![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 263
|
IBM, insurer develop 'eHarmony for the call center'
A real-time analytics engine matches callers with the representative who can best help them
By: Chris Kanaracus, it World From: http://www.itworld.com/business-inte...=Google+Reader March 18, 2010, 12:40 AM - IDG News Service - IBM and insurance provider Assurant Solutions have come up with a project that, in the manner of dating services like eHarmony, uses analytics to match up call center callers with the most appropriate representative. The Real-Time Analytics Matching Program (RAMP) is an attempt at improving the traditional call center experience, where calls are routed via few menu options, such as which language the caller speaks and the type of product involved, but don't necessarily end up getting handled by an agent capable of resolving the problem. The RAMP system's real-time analytics engine weights factors such as a caller's average wait time, payment history or spending patterns. It then looks for an ideal agent to take the call, based on their past performance and skill set. Prediction algorithms figure out when an optimal agent will be free, and the system sends them the call. RAMP's capabilities could also be expanded by adding more types of data, such as "psychographic" details of a caller's historical demeanor, said Toby Cook, practice leader, IBM Analytics Solutions Team, IBM Global Business Services. "If they're traditionally cranky, and [the company has] that data available as a score input, you could match that to optimal agents." RAMP helps a company determine which agents are the best, and also "takes this next tier of agent and tends to move them up to the top, because success garners success," he said. "Because you're matching them [with the most appropriate caller] they tend to do well. Even your lower performers tend to do better." Although RAMP has clear kinship with certain IBM software products, such as its ILOG business rules engine and the predictive analytics capabilities it acquired by buying SPSS, as of now RAMP is "completely componentized and built as a standardized asset," Cook said. IBM intends to build integrations between RAMP and those software offerings over time, he said. RAMP's roots lie at Assurant itself. The company's "decision science" team developed an initial version of the system in-house about seven years ago, said Mike Politz, vice president. The project increased sales revenue by 29 percent in the first year after completion, according to a statement. Assurant began working with IBM more recently in an effort to improve the system's performance, he said. The company will maintain ownership of certain intellectual property in RAMP as IBM takes it to other clients, he said. While RAMP has been optimized for IBM hardware and software platforms, it can be made to work with rival systems, Cook said. Currently it is supported on UNIX, with Linux next. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
aliasx
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,010
|
Should work as long as they pay the "asshole caller" agent more.
__________________
https://porncorporation.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 17,393
|
I would think that they don't need to, since the system will figure it out... for example, newbies who are a lot less jaded may go better with that sort of caller, at first. Then over time their "asshole handling" score declines, so the system sends those calls more to newbies than this person...
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
jellyfish
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
|
why does it matter when i barely understand any call centres i get put through to anyway
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |