Washington Post Writer: Internet Journalism Is ?Sort Of Like Terrorism - GoFuckYourself.com

PornoStar69 · 04-21-2010, 11:50 AM

Washington Post Writer: Internet Journalism Is ?Sort Of Like Terrorism

little fuck

https://youtube.com/watch?v=z_Hqe...layer_embedded
A Washington Post columnist who appeared on CBS? Face the Nation on Sunday described tea partiers as potentially violent and decried internet journalism as ?sort of like terrorism?

When asked about her views on the Tea Party by host Bob Schieffer, Kathleen Parker, a Pulitzer Prize winning commentator, declared it to be dangerous:

??this heated rhetoric and some of these words?that are pretty loaded, ?reload,? ?targeting??there?s a danger there.? Parker said.

After describing the movement as dangerous Parker then said she wasn?t saying that it was dangerous:

?I?m not saying the tea party people are violent or racist or any of that?.I?m not saying that the tea partiers are bad people or dangerous, I just think we have to be very vigilant?.and be extremely careful, because I do think there is a lot of anger and it could become something else.?

Schieffer then injected the talking point of the internet as a source of such ?danger?:

?Some of this really nasty rhetoric that shows up on the Internet?.the only vehicle to deliver news that has no editor?.And that is the added factor to the volatility of this stuff and where it goes.?

To which Parker replied ?It?s, sort of, like terrorism. You know, we don?t know where to aim our bombs, so we can?t go after a country because there are ? you know, there?s no one place to focus on it. And it?s the same thing with ? with the Internet. You can?t really ? you don?t know who to go after.?

Classic. A mainstream media fixture warning grassroots activists not to use ?loaded? rhetoric before describing the alternative media as ?sort of like terrorism?.

Parker, who also often appears as the token ?conservative? pundit on The Chris Matthews Show, then further warned of hate speech emanating through internet journalism:

?People who are not well-grounded and who may have these more violent tendencies suddenly find a place where they can convene and find validation and even find company. And I don?t know where that all leads, but it?s ? it?s, kind of, scary.? she said.

Agent 488 · 04-21-2010, 11:51 AM

stop reporting shit from prison planet and fuck off no one gives a fuck.

PornoStar69 · 04-21-2010, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488

stop reporting shit from prison planet and fuck off no one gives a fuck.

shut up you bugger - I answer to the owners of GFY & Eric. simply informing people.

fatfoo · 04-21-2010, 11:55 AM

Parker is partly right. People go on the internet and they hide their face. Getting a message from the internet is like receiving a message from someone hiding their face. You don't know who to go after - yes, it is true.

If someone does show face or identification, then you know who to go after.

04-21-2010, 11:50 AM	#1
PornoStar69 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: xxweekxx mothers bed. Posts: 2,034	Washington Post Writer: Internet Journalism Is ?Sort Of Like Terrorism Washington Post Writer: Internet Journalism Is ?Sort Of Like Terrorism little fuck https://youtube.com/watch?v=z_Hqe...layer_embedded A Washington Post columnist who appeared on CBS? Face the Nation on Sunday described tea partiers as potentially violent and decried internet journalism as ?sort of like terrorism? When asked about her views on the Tea Party by host Bob Schieffer, Kathleen Parker, a Pulitzer Prize winning commentator, declared it to be dangerous: ??this heated rhetoric and some of these words?that are pretty loaded, ?reload,? ?targeting??there?s a danger there.? Parker said. After describing the movement as dangerous Parker then said she wasn?t saying that it was dangerous: ?I?m not saying the tea party people are violent or racist or any of that?.I?m not saying that the tea partiers are bad people or dangerous, I just think we have to be very vigilant?.and be extremely careful, because I do think there is a lot of anger and it could become something else.? Schieffer then injected the talking point of the internet as a source of such ?danger?: ?Some of this really nasty rhetoric that shows up on the Internet?.the only vehicle to deliver news that has no editor?.And that is the added factor to the volatility of this stuff and where it goes.? To which Parker replied ?It?s, sort of, like terrorism. You know, we don?t know where to aim our bombs, so we can?t go after a country because there are ? you know, there?s no one place to focus on it. And it?s the same thing with ? with the Internet. You can?t really ? you don?t know who to go after.? Classic. A mainstream media fixture warning grassroots activists not to use ?loaded? rhetoric before describing the alternative media as ?sort of like terrorism?. Parker, who also often appears as the token ?conservative? pundit on The Chris Matthews Show, then further warned of hate speech emanating through internet journalism: ?People who are not well-grounded and who may have these more violent tendencies suddenly find a place where they can convene and find validation and even find company. And I don?t know where that all leads, but it?s ? it?s, kind of, scary.? she said. __________________ GFY King?

04-21-2010, 11:55 AM	#4
fatfoo ICQ:649699063 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 27,763	Parker is partly right. People go on the internet and they hide their face. Getting a message from the internet is like receiving a message from someone hiding their face. You don't know who to go after - yes, it is true. If someone does show face or identification, then you know who to go after. __________________ Send me an email: [email protected] Last edited by fatfoo; 04-21-2010 at 11:56 AM..

04-21-2010, 11:51 AM	#2
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	stop reporting shit from prison planet and fuck off no one gives a fuck.