![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
emperor of my world
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nethalands
Posts: 29,903
|
SE: content order in source code vs. css (what people see)?
It is known that for blogs, you want the dynamic post content being crawled first (=start of source code) and your static sidebar (with blogroll, categories etc.) last (=at least after the post content).
Here's the deal for a blog im making: In the source code of the blog, the content column is first, then the sidebar. The .css file turns it around so that the visitor sees the sidebar left and the content to the right. But when you click source code, like i said, first there's the post content and then the sidebar. I want to keep the layout how it looks with the left sidebar, so im wondering how in depth SE's look at css files? The content div has a float: right and the sidebar a float: left, and thats it. Will SE's look at this and decide that they index the sidebar first, and then the content? I personally find this hard to believe, since i think the hard coded source code is still way more important to SE's..... right? Experts, step inside! |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
|
there's no reason for SEs to look in .css but who knows..
check your web logs if spiderbots request .css files
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
emperor of my world
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nethalands
Posts: 29,903
|
hm ok. Here's an interesting read though: http://serpeo-seo.com/2010/03/08/doe...awl-css-files/
I wonder how thorough google crawls the css. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
emperor of my world
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nethalands
Posts: 29,903
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Behind the scenes
Posts: 5,190
|
if spider bots request .css files then there is something to think about
although i highly doubt it, spider bots on the backend essentially are text browsers, i would think it would be too much overhead for SE's to process relevancy based on design elements (css rules and positioning)
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |