Night Crew, Please Critique my GUI

[digitaldivas]

http://www.naturallyvoluptuous.com/big-tit-links.html

Please let me know what you think of the layout, navigation, etc. It is
pretty much under construction and I have alot of work ahead of me.
Any feedback would be appreciated.

It has made page one and two of google for big tit links and busty links. Figured I would start working on this monster and finishing up the models index of digitaldivasonline this holiday season.

[Machete_]

it's ok .

[digitaldivas]

great, thanks, anyone else please. were all friends here and if you own a busty or big tit site and it doesn't suck, chances are you will be on this site at some point, so bitch now or forever hold your peace. thank you and good morning peverts

[Litzer]

Looks clean. Reminds me of a salon.

[scouser]

text is far too wide. split it into two cols or something.
plus the copy should probably be completely re-written.

As you know, quality Busty Directories like us don't pop out of thin air everyday. Everything takes and costs money! The only thing that we ask is that if you dig these Busty Models or Busty Websites, for the Love of God, support them

what are you trying to tell people there? hire a copywriter ;) :P

plus, is it a paysite ? or an affiliate site? or both?

[digitaldivas]

no, it is an Affiliate site, I being the affiliate. I am building naturallyvoluptuous.com for them, and hopefully making them and I a little money. Will eventually transfer all of the sites i am promoting on DDO to here.

And telling surfers, if they dig shit, then for the love of God, support them. In the past, many beautiful, "sellable" big tit models have retired, because they can't justify doing the site with what they make because of pirated content.

Do you think I say too much?

[digitaldivas]

Originally Posted by Litzer

Looks clean. Reminds me of a salon.

thank you, i will mos def take that as a compliment

[TeenCat]

hm man looks clean, but i would try the top background with 100% width and i really dont like that text in other layer or what, i mean it looks like blured pics instead of text and you cant select the text, its very amateurish as text it may look much better imho ... but looks good and if you got some se traffic have luck and lets make some sales

[DamianJ]

Looks like a programmer made it.

No sense of personality, no branding, nothing interesting.

And as stated, the copywriting needs a great deal of work, probably best to hire someone with English as a first language to do it.

[digitaldivas]

Originally Posted by TeenCat

hm man looks clean, but i would try the top background with 100% width and i really dont like that text in other layer or what, i mean it looks like blured pics instead of text and you cant select the text, its very amateurish as text it may look much better imho ... but looks good and if you got some se traffic have luck and lets make some sales

...your up early

[digitaldivas]

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Looks like a programmer made it.

No sense of personality, no branding, nothing interesting.

And as stated, the copywriting needs a great deal of work, probably best to hire someone with English as a first language to do it.

I have not done a final optimization any of my pages, save the index. It is underconstruction.

[bns666]

a bit too wide for my taste

[digitaldivas]

Originally Posted by bns666

a bit too wide for my taste

width is around 1000 pixels. thanks for the feedback though

[digitaldivas]

...messing around with server settings, it will be off and on for a bit.

[candyflip]

You've got a lot of empty tables in that code. Why not clean it up and do it CSS?

[DamianJ]

Originally Posted by digitaldivas

I have not done a final optimization any of my pages, save the index. It is underconstruction.

What has optimization got to do with what I said??

My point was the site looked like a programmer made it, not a designer. It looks like someone with absolutely no idea on UI or design made it. It is cold, bland, uninviting and looks like a geek learning resource on Ruby or PHP.

The other point was the copy is dreadful and reads like someone who can't speak english well wrote it.

See the candygirlcash sites for what I mean about personality.

[digitaldivas]

Originally Posted by DamianJ

What has optimization got to do with what I said??

My point was the site looked like a programmer made it, not a designer. It looks like someone with absolutely no idea on UI or design made it. It is cold, bland, uninviting and looks like a geek learning resource on Ruby or PHP.

The other point was the copy is dreadful and reads like someone who can't speak english well wrote it.

See the candygirlcash sites for what I mean about personality.

It's not a paysite, it's an index/model directory. thanks for your input. It would be nice if candygirl sites streamed the promo video instead of having to download it.

So what sucks about it? navigation, layout? I think with all of the individual pages, that it's not bad for a static site...

[Davy]

Originally Posted by DamianJ

See the candygirlcash sites for what I mean about personality.

Which candygirlcash site are you referring to specifically?