Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2018, 05:17 PM   #151
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
What will they "investigate"? That a drunken teenage girl remembers 30 years later under hypnosis that a drunken teenage boy groped her?

So if they do the same 3 day "investigation" that they did on actual Federal employees in an incident that was fairly recent and all involved were adults...with this decades old accusation of teenage stupidity...then what will the Democrats and media do then?

Will they then accuse the FBI of being "political" after spending the last 2 years telling us that the FBI are sweet angels beyond reproach?

Hell man...even thinking that 2 teenage kids from 36 years ago could or should be "investigated" is fucking stupid to me.

What's next?

Did Kavanaugh finger a girl when he was 5 years old?
Or maybe play with one of his guy friends pee-pee when they were 7 years old?

And then what?
"CNN BREAKING NEWS: Brett Kavanaugh had his genitalia exposed in the hospital nursery to several other newborn infants...Democrats call for FBI investigation"
lol
for starters, they can investigate the other guy in the room, he's refusing to make statements under oath.

but more to your point: they shouldn't investigate because it's difficult to investigate isn't a valid reason not to investigate.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:19 PM   #152
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
There's an old saying in politics:
"If you aren't a Democrat when you're young...you have no heart.
If you aren't a Republican when you get older...you have no brain."
fortunately, I've kept my heart as I've grown older.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:21 PM   #153
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I have no real interest in debating whether or not this is all some political scam or not because there is no point in that. That said, I do believe that if she refuses to speak to the committee then this matter should be dropped. If she wants to make accusations, that is fair, but when called upon to defend those accusations she has to be willing to do so.
How can the congressional committee ask appropriate questions and such if they don't know what's going on due to no investigation?

that's her point. I tend to agree.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:22 PM   #154
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Another great piece by McCarthy

First, in no case does even the most sympathetic, convincing victim of a crime get to dictate the terms of the investigation.

Second, in any sexual-assault investigation, an interview of the alleged victim is among the first things that must be done. Here, moreover, it would be the first thing, since after 36 years a forensic investigation is not possible. Because the alleged victim’s version of events would dictate the course of the rest of the investigation, it would be absurd to delay an interview.

Third, as long as Ford’s counsel want to talk about regular, independent investigations, we should note that there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations. Professional investigators understand only too well the inherent unreliability of allegations raised in the manner Ford’s have been raised. The only relevance of this alleged incident is to a Senate function, so it is for the Senate committee to decide how to proceed.

Fourth, as Ford’s lawyers well know, in our adversary system, we do not submit disputes to a team of independent expert investigators. We have advocates for each side — partisans — make the case as well as it can be made from their side’s perspective, and we let the other side attack with all its partisan might. We allow each side to examine the other’s witnesses. Based on this often heated clash, we expect that members of the public will be able to figure out what information is reliable, what is nonsense, and what the truth is. That is the process we use for deciding life-and-death criminal sentences, as well as civil judgments that can be financially ruinous. We have used it for centuries because it works.

It is fashionable throat-clearing at this point to offer some vertiginous, ostentatiously sympathetic twaddle about how Professor Ford is credible in the sense that she truly believes what she has claimed, yet mistaken about . . . well . . . everything that matters. Sorry, I’m a simple man. What’s happening here is pure BS.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...-must-testify/
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:23 PM   #155
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
he's refusing to make statements under oath.

but more to your point: they shouldn't investigate because it's difficult to investigate isn't a valid reason not to investigate.
1. So is the accuser. She is refusing to appear before Congress under oath or make any statement under oath so far.

2. The valid reason to "not investigate" is that the FBI is for Federal Crimes. Not teenagers fucking around 36 years ago (if that even happened in the first place)
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:26 PM   #156
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
How can the congressional committee ask appropriate questions and such if they don't know what's going on due to no investigation?

that's her point. I tend to agree.
I agree that there should be an investigation. I would be completely fine if she wanted to do a private committee meeting where she just reads a statement demanding an investigation and explaining her side of the story.

After the horseshit the Republicans pulled with Garland I don't mind the political tactics, but I do believe a person has the right to face their accuser. He and the committee at least deserve to hear her speak and give her side of the story even if there are no follow up questions asked.
kane is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:28 PM   #157
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
1. So is the accuser. She is refusing to appear before Congress under oath or make any statement under oath so far.

2. The valid reason to "not investigate" is that the FBI is for Federal Crimes. Not teenagers fucking around 36 years ago (if that even happened in the first place)
they want her to testify on live television about attempted rape. that's not OK.

the FBI is tasked with investigating SC nominees at the request of the potus. standard protocol.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:33 PM   #158
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
How can the congressional committee ask appropriate questions and such if they don't know what's going on due to no investigation?

that's her point. I tend to agree.
Well...they have HER saying what happened.
And if other people were there (which she says there were only Kavanaugh and one other guy in the room) then they are saying what happened as well.

Not sure if there's anything left to "investigate". It's a 36 year old "he said, she said"

Literally impossible to "investigate" anything under those circumstances.

No matter what happens...people like us will make up our minds. But we don't count.

As for the Senate...the Dems will be "outraged" and the Republicans will vote him in.

And I still don't think that anything like this as a drunken teenager would be something that should disqualify a person from the Supreme Court...or anything in life for that matter.

Now IF he had beat a girl down and flat out raped her? Hell yes. He should be put out of the picture immediately.
But drunken stupidity as a teen that may or may not have even happened?
No.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:33 PM   #159
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I agree that there should be an investigation. I would be completely fine if she wanted to do a private committee meeting where she just reads a statement demanding an investigation and explaining her side of the story.

After the horseshit the Republicans pulled with Garland I don't mind the political tactics, but I do believe a person has the right to face their accuser. He and the committee at least deserve to hear her speak and give her side of the story even if there are no follow up questions asked.
"Third, as long as Ford’s counsel want to talk about regular, independent investigations, we should note that there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations. Professional investigators understand only too well the inherent unreliability of allegations raised in the manner Ford’s have been raised. The only relevance of this alleged incident is to a Senate function, so it is for the Senate committee to decide how to proceed."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...-must-testify/


Andrew McCarthy isn't just any journalist


Andrew C. McCarthy III (born 1959)[1] is an American columnist for National Review. He served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.[2][3][4] A Republican, he is most notable for leading the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others. The defendants were convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and planning a series of attacks against New York City landmarks.[5] He also contributed to the prosecutions of terrorists who bombed US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He resigned from the Justice Department in 2003.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_C._McCarthy

He's also a Never Trump'er
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:38 PM   #160
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
"Third, as long as Ford’s counsel want to talk about regular, independent investigations, we should note that there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations. Professional investigators understand only too well the inherent unreliability of allegations raised in the manner Ford’s have been raised. The only relevance of this alleged incident is to a Senate function, so it is for the Senate committee to decide how to proceed."

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...-must-testify/


Andrew McCarthy isn't just any journalist


Andrew C. McCarthy III (born 1959)[1] is an American columnist for National Review. He served as an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.[2][3][4] A Republican, he is most notable for leading the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others. The defendants were convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and planning a series of attacks against New York City landmarks.[5] He also contributed to the prosecutions of terrorists who bombed US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. He resigned from the Justice Department in 2003.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_C._McCarthy

He's also a Never Trump'er
This guy could sit on the Supreme Court for 30+ years and make rulings that could effect millions of lives. There should be an investigation and we should be 100% sure about him before he is confirmed. I understand there is not going to be any kind of criminal prosecution. But when it comes to a position this important, everything should be looked into.
kane is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:39 PM   #161
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
they want her to testify on live television about attempted rape. that's not OK.

the FBI is tasked with investigating SC nominees at the request of the potus. standard protocol.
Wrong.
I'll say it again...they have offered her to do it in open testimony (on live television like she originally wanted to do), and they have offered in CLOSED testimony, and they have offered to send staff members to her home to take her testimony in private.

How much further can they bend over backwards for a woman who originally claimed she couldn't WAIT to tell her "story"?

You see what I'm saying? This is looking worse and worse for HER. And that is a bad thing for women who have actually been sexually attacked and/or raped.

If she has suddenly changed her mind (as it appears) and doesn't want to do it in public...she has been given every option to do it out of the public eye.

It's all political delay shenanigans at this point.
But it's not going to make any difference. Even if Kavanaugh was somehow stopped in his nomination...Trump will just nominate another guy.

Hell, maybe he ought to throw Kavanaugh under the bus so the Democrats and media can crow about a "victory" and possibly get the next nominee voted in on whether or not he is qualified as a legal expert on the Constitution to sit on the Supreme Court. (which is what it's SUPPOSED to be about)

EDIT: Also the FBI is NOT "tasked" with doing investigations on Supreme Court Nominees. Hell, the FBI didn't even EXIST until a few decades ago.
And what they do now...for ALL govt. officials and employees are Background Checks to make sure they aren't crazed monsters.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:49 PM   #162
RedFred
Confirmed User
 
RedFred's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Hell, the FBI didn't even EXIST until a few decades ago.

Such brilliance.

Formed‎: ‎July 26, 1908; 110 years ago


RedFred is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:52 PM   #163
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
This guy could sit on the Supreme Court for 30+ years and make rulings that could effect millions of lives. There should be an investigation and we should be 100% sure about him before he is confirmed. I understand there is not going to be any kind of criminal prosecution. But when it comes to a position this important, everything should be looked into.
"there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations."
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:53 PM   #164
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
No Robbie. I don't at all see what you're saying. You're not even aware of the protocols in how SC judges are appointed, you really don't know about FBI background checks?
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:54 PM   #165
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
"there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations."
Bill Cosby knows otherwise.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:54 PM   #166
Helix
Confirmed User
 
Helix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,687
If she doesn't cause a delay until after the mid terms she might have to refund the Soros money.
__________________
Sigless
Helix is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:56 PM   #167
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 22,581
Democratic Senator receives letter during SCOTUS confirmation alleging he committed sexual assault 36 years ago when they were both minors at a party - Senator leaks it to the press, sits on it, goes on a PR tour... but does not alert the authorities that a crime was committed and then the witness does not even want to be interviewed by the FBI as part of a standard crime investigation.

Sounds legit.
__________________
If you don't like that Elon Musk bought twitter,... just build your own and stop crying about it.
TheSquealer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 05:56 PM   #168
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Why you guys cling to kavanaugh is beyond me. Just like you claim this woman isnt to be believed because this is a political conspiracy bit oh no, an investigation is out of the question.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:01 PM   #169
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
"there is not a police organization in America that would entertain her allegation, in light of the lapse of time and the long-ago exhaustion of the statute of limitations."
This is for a Supreme Court appointment. There should be an investigation. Special circumstances call for special measures.
kane is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:03 PM   #170
RedFred
Confirmed User
 
RedFred's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Why you guys cling to kavanaugh is beyond me. Just like you claim this woman isnt to be believed because this is a political conspiracy bit oh no, an investigation is out of the question.

Because they DON'T CARE whether it happened or not. They would support Charles Manson if Trump nominated him.
RedFred is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:03 PM   #171
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Bill Cosby knows otherwise.
You could say the same about Catholic Priests.. Know what the difference is? 1 allegation with obvious political motives and zero ways to back it up.. As opposed to multiple allegations....
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:07 PM   #172
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
got it. so attempted rape is a concern for you only when it's institutionalized by the church. but it's completely irrelevant with SC judges.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:09 PM   #173
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
again, if this is so obviously a democrat hatchet job, then why the complaining about an investigation that would blow the lid right off that.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:09 PM   #174
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
No Robbie. I don't at all see what you're saying. You're not even aware of the protocols in how SC judges are appointed, you really don't know about FBI background checks?
I JUST SAID they do background checks.

And I also pointed out that NO...they aren't "tasked" with INVESTIGATIONS of Supreme Court Justices as "standard protocol".

They did ONE investigation on Clarence Thomas in a highly heated political atmosphere.

There is NOTHING in the U.S. Constitution that says any of that has to be done. Not even the "background checks" (which our founding fathers would have found repulsive as the govt. invading a person's privacy).

And as I further pointed out...the FBI didn't even EXIST until a few decades ago.

You're kind of implying that one of the FBI's duties as standard operating procedure is that a Supreme Court Justice MUST BE INVESTIGATED (not background check...which Kavanaugh has already had SIX of those done by the FBI).
And to that I would say...how in the world did we have Supreme Court Justices for the first 100 plus years of the nation...since there was NO FBI? lol

I get what you are saying...there is exactly ONE precedent (Clarence Thomas) in which the FBI did an INVESTIGATION. It took THREE DAYS and they found Anita Hill's accusations to be false.
And yes, they now do BACKGROUND CHECKS (which are completely different than an investigation) on every govt. employee.

And as I said...Kavanaugh has had SIX of those FBI background checks performed over his years working with the govt.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:14 PM   #175
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Robbie, the FBI has been doing background investigations on SC nominees for decades.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:16 PM   #176
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
the FBI has been around for over 100 years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFred View Post
Such brilliance.

Formed‎: ‎July 26, 1908; 110 years ago


dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:18 PM   #177
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
(which our founding fathers would have found repulsive as the govt. invading a person's privacy).
you're going to have a difficult time arguing that our founding fathers would have been repulsed by due diligence on SC nominees.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:25 PM   #178
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
1. So is the accuser. She is refusing to appear before Congress under oath or make any statement under oath so far.

2. The valid reason to "not investigate" is that the FBI is for Federal Crimes. Not teenagers fucking around 36 years ago (if that even happened in the first place)
And once again, you are wrong on both accounts.

1) It's a bit unfair to ask someone to suddenly appear before Congressional board and testify under oath. Someone who is asked to testify in any court at any level needs to be briefed and prepped an attorney. Seriously Robbie, I went into traffic court better prepared this woman is.

2) The FBI can in fact investigate. Do no tell me this is a "Local crime" or that is not a federal crime, and thus the FBI isn't required to investigate this. Bullshit. Bull fucking shit. The FBI did an background check into Kavanaugh, as they do with anyone who is being considered for such a position. Obviously they need to re-open that background check - and thus investigate. The FBI investigated Anita Hill and her claims - why can't they do so now?

I'm calling bullshit on all of this. There is no doubt in my mind that this event happened. Kavanaugh has already stated he wasn't at that party.

Which party?

The woman who claims to have been sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh hasn't told anyone which party it was, and hasn't told anyone where it was. Kavanaugh is telling us he wasn't at this party. How does he know which party it was or where it was? There must have been dozens of parties over a two - four year period, but Kavanaugh is able to pin it to the exact party this event "might" have taken place. How can he know he wasn't there being as he doesn't know which party it was? Unless he was there, it did happen, and it remembers it well.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:26 PM   #179
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Robbie, the FBI has been doing background investigations on SC nominees for decades.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
the FBI has been around for over 100 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
you're going to have a difficult time arguing that our founding fathers would have been repulsed by due diligence on SC nominees.
1. That is EXACTLY what I said in my postings above...for DECADES.

2. Again...that is EXACTLY what I said when I said there was no FBI for the first 100 plus years of our country. Are you even reading what I'm typing?

3. There was no FBI for the late 1700's when the founding fathers were in charge. Nor the 1800's.
And "due diligence" is NOT a background check. Background checks are so intrusive and such an invasion of privacy that the Supreme Court had to rule on it in 2011 over employers using background checks (they upheld that they can)
https://www.wired.com/2011/01/scotus-background-checks/

Anyway, either we are having a failure to communicate of maybe you're just fucking with me. lol
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:36 PM   #180
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
Hell, the FBI didn't even EXIST until a few decades ago.
must be a failure to communicate because you clearly claim that the FBI is only a few decades old.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:37 PM   #181
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Robbie, you really think SC judges should be appointed without background investigations?
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 06:39 PM   #182
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
again, serious question, why not have an investigation? it would reveal the hatchet job you claim is going on here and it would get your guy approved and prove us all wrong.

seems legit.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 07:35 PM   #183
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
And once again, you are wrong on both accounts.

1) It's a bit unfair to ask someone to suddenly appear before Congressional board and testify under oath. Someone who is asked to testify in any court at any level needs to be briefed and prepped an attorney. Seriously Robbie, I went into traffic court better prepared this woman is.

2) The FBI can in fact investigate. Do no tell me this is a "Local crime" or that is not a federal crime, and thus the FBI isn't required to investigate this. Bullshit. Bull fucking shit. The FBI did an background check into Kavanaugh, as they do with anyone who is being considered for such a position. Obviously they need to re-open that background check - and thus investigate. The FBI investigated Anita Hill and her claims - why can't they do so now?

I'm calling bullshit on all of this. There is no doubt in my mind that this event happened. Kavanaugh has already stated he wasn't at that party.

Which party?

The woman who claims to have been sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh hasn't told anyone which party it was, and hasn't told anyone where it was. Kavanaugh is telling us he wasn't at this party. How does he know which party it was or where it was? There must have been dozens of parties over a two - four year period, but Kavanaugh is able to pin it to the exact party this event "might" have taken place. How can he know he wasn't there being as he doesn't know which party it was? Unless he was there, it did happen, and it remembers it well.
The woman claims a friend took her there.. How is it she remembers these males names but can't remember her friends name? 4 other people, 3 males and 1 other female. Kav, Judge, Smyth and the mysterious female "friend"

Here's your investigation in it's entirety.. Find out who Smyth was dating when crazy cunt was 15 and you have the "friend" because Smyth wasn't in the room and apparently neither was the mystery female so that means they were together elsewhere for this story to work out.
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 07:56 PM   #184
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764


__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:05 PM   #185
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
"On Monday Sept. 17th, Christine Blasey Ford’s high school yearbooks suddenly disappeared from the web. I read them days before, knew they would be scrubbed, and saved them. Why did I know they would be scrubbed? Because if roles were reversed, and Christine Blasey Ford had been nominated for the Supreme Court by President Trump, the headline by the resistance would be this:

CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD AND THE DRUNKEN WHITE PRIVILEGED RACIST PLAYGIRLS OF HOLTON-ARMS."
CULT OF THE 1ST AMENDMENT: WHY CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S HIGH SCHOOL YEARBOOKS WERE SCRUBBED: Faculty Approved Racism, Binge Drinking and Promiscuity

Now I can add Two-faced KKK Sorority member to Crazy Cunt Liberal
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:16 PM   #186
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Then why so scared of an investigation? Blow the lid off the shit.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:17 PM   #187
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Then why so scared of an investigation? Blow the lid off the shit.
Investigation of what? She said, he said?
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:23 PM   #188
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Answer the question Claire.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:24 PM   #189
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
This is for a Supreme Court appointment. There should be an investigation. Special circumstances call for special measures.
This is stunning. This is a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law. The moment there is any hint of any wrong doing everything related to this nomination should stop until it is completely and thoroughly investigated. Not doing due diligence for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law would be criminal.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:25 PM   #190
Helix
Confirmed User
 
Helix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,687
Christine Ford has made the accusation and the burden of proof is on her. If she doesn't want to bring it then this is done imo.
__________________
Sigless
Helix is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:26 PM   #191
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
This is stunning. This is a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law. The moment there is any hint of any wrong doing everything related to this nomination should stop until it is completely and thoroughly investigated. Not doing due diligence for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law would be criminal.

I totally agree with you Richard.
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:28 PM   #192
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Answer the question Claire.
I personally don't give a shit if they have an investigation.. Because it would be nothing either way.... That's the point.. It can't be proven or disproven without evidence or corroborating witnesses.... If the mysterious female appears then maybe something would come of it.. She will never be named.. If she is named it will be a dead persons name. I wouldn't put it past these fucks to do that.
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:30 PM   #193
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
This is stunning. This is a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law. The moment there is any hint of any wrong doing everything related to this nomination should stop until it is completely and thoroughly investigated. Not doing due diligence for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the law would be criminal.
Feinstein could have revealed this in the proper manner and it would have been examined... Instead she withheld it until after everything was done.. "The moment there was any hint of wrong doing" was months go...
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 08:39 PM   #194
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam View Post
I personally don't give a shit if they have an investigation.. Because it would be nothing either way.... That's the point.. It can't be proven or disproven without evidence or corroborating witnesses.... If the mysterious female appears then maybe something would come of it.. She will never be named.. If she is named it will be a dead persons name. I wouldn't put it past these fucks to do that.
You're short sighted. An investigation can prove your crazy exclamation that this woman threw herself, her career, and her children under the bus in some elobarate democrat hatchet job to stop kavanaugh.

Why wouldn't you want to proof yourself?
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:01 PM   #195
onwebcam
Fake Nick 1.0
 
onwebcam's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rent free, your head
Posts: 26,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
You're short sighted. An investigation can prove your crazy exclamation that this woman threw herself, her career, and her children under the bus in some elobarate democrat hatchet job to stop kavanaugh.

Why wouldn't you want to proof yourself?
How would that be proven? Put everyone involved under "marriage counseling hypnosis?" Use a psychic medium to speak to her "friend" in an out of body experience or maybe travel back to the rough date and the medium can spend a few months following her around? Invent a time machine?
__________________
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
onwebcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:06 PM   #196
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
1. So is the accuser. She is refusing to appear before Congress under oath or make any statement under oath so far.

2. The valid reason to "not investigate" is that the FBI is for Federal Crimes. Not teenagers fucking around 36 years ago (if that even happened in the first place)
She asked the FBI to investigate before its seen by Congress. She knows that in Congress it'll just be a bunch of softballs throw at Kavanaugh and poison arrows thrown at her with no gathered evidence or investigation. She seems to have less to hide than a Congres who looks to be ramming this SC pick through as fast as they can before someone finds out something they've been trying to hide with all of their document ommissions -- which oddly enough is old news now that the sexual allegations are here. But it's probably related.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:07 PM   #197
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
must be a failure to communicate because you clearly claim that the FBI is only a few decades old.
It is. It wasn't even called the FBI until 1935. And it definitely wasn't doing background checks on Supreme Court Justices in any of those early years.

They only had a total of 34 agents in 1908, and they were "special agents of the Justice Dept.". It wasn't until J. Edgar Hoover racheted it up in the 1940's that it became much of anything.

And yeah. I'd say that 11 decades is a "few decades old" if you count the time that the agency was first started.

Anyway...sounds like you just want to argue for arguments sake for some reason.

My whole point was that "No"...the Constitution does NOT "task" the FBI with doing investigations into the Supreme Court nominees. It doesn't even "task" them with doing background checks...because there was no FBI in existence, and yet the Supreme Court somehow was filled for the majority of the country's life span (first Supreme Court was in 1789)

So the FBI has been around for 110 years. Only did background checks in recent times on Govt. employees (and please don't parse "recent" as meaning in the last couple of years...I'm speaking in relative terms).

But even if they came out of the gate in 1908 doing background checks (they didn't)...
That would be 119 years of Supreme Courts with NO FBI doing background checks. As opposed to the FBI only existing in any form at all for 110 years.

THAT was my point.

They have only done ONE INVESTIGATION of a Supreme Court nominee in history. And that was the Anita Hill accusations toward Clarence Thomas.
And her accusations were stating that he did things in a govt. office as govt. employees.

In THREE days they cleared it.

This situation is not even close to being anything like that at all.

And as I said already...Kavanaugh has had SIX FBI background checks done on him already.
Nothing ever came of them.

So again... a big fat "NO" to your statement that it is "standard protocol" to INVESTIGATE Supreme Court nominees.

You may have misspoken and meant BACKGROUND CHECKS...in which case I would say again...he's had SIX of them done already.

And hell no...it's not the FBI's job to investigate teenagers getting drunk and fucking around 36 years ago.
They have actual important things to do at the FBI (like framing the President). lol
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:07 PM   #198
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Anyone who thinks a woman would subject herself to this for any other reason than to do what she considers her civic duty is ignorant as fuck. It's probably like going through hell, but since Kavanaugh has been dominating the news, Ford has probably been reliving the incident in her mind every time she sees his smug face on TV.

We all know this shit happened. And it is disqualifying for a SC judge, even if it did happen at 17. No one with enough character to be a Supreme Court Justice has ever been a person would attempt to rape a girl. You don't just go from raping to developing into a non-raping human. He just hides it well.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:09 PM   #199
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 60,350
Robbie, are you advocating appointing SC justices without investigating their backgrounds?
dyna mo is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2018, 09:15 PM   #200
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
Robbie, are you advocating appointing SC justices without investigating their backgrounds?
You are definitely in a mood tonight. lol

No, when I SAY I'm advocating that...then you will know it. Because I actually say what I mean.
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks

Tags
told, accounts, wayback, media, social, kavanaugh, activist, professor/political, accuser, cleaning, weekend, spent, far-left
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.