SEO Hosting Explained

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LA Crew
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2008
    • 1356

    #121
    Great post Lloyd

    Comment

    • 1200mics
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2005
      • 5131

      #122
      Originally posted by alias
      Example: I want to sell my meth for fags to "booty bump" on corner A. Now corner A already has a huge batch of faggot meth salesmen, I contact some dude to enable me to sell booty bump meth to horny fags on corners b-z.

      Any more questions?
      Hahahahahahha :D

      Comment

      • Darrell
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2003
        • 803

        #123
        Originally posted by daveylapoo
        This network grew slowly and steadily for close to 2 years - till summer of 2009, when close to 400 varied sites were unceremoniously dropped over a frighteningly short 2 day period.

        However, after careful examination, there were small, NEARLY undetectable points of commonality to most of these sites. These sent up a flag, and...well...you know the rest.

        Bottom line: Be careful. It CAN happen.

        And now, back to work...
        If you don't mind me asking, what do you think were the points of commonality to most of your sites that google picked up on?

        Comment

        • alias
          aliasx
          • Apr 2001
          • 19010

          #124
          Originally posted by daveylapoo
          First off, I am a customer of the Poster's service, and feel it offers a fair value.

          I also have been recently subject to a MEGA-SUPER-GOOGLE sandbox penalty and lost thousands of first and second page placements, and more than half of my overall traffic.

          Note: I DO NOT feel that 'SEO Hosting' was responsible for this ban.

          However, the above quote is a very, VERY important read for ANYONE who is considering signing up for 'SEO' (or any other type of) hosting with the intention of crosslinking, link wheeling, or any other type of manual manipulation / link sculpting strategies.

          Different IP's is a good start, which is what Gotwebhost provides. However, the nameservers on ALL these accounts (at least mine) are registered to...guess who?

          This is a point of commonality.

          Outside of this, so is your registrar, whois info, affiliate ID's, site plugins, templates, and all factors listed above and more.

          Now, there is no PROOF that any of these factors have direct SEO implications, but if you think your a-b-c link strategy or 5 different IP's are fooling the big G, you're sadly mistaken. The creation of a truly 'organic' network in the purest sense is nearly impossible to achieve.

          The networks I had created were what I though to be VERY organic and VERY well crafted, with all the above factors taken into consideration and more. Most importantly, all sites had UNIQUE, ORIGINAL content. This above ALL ELSE is KEY.

          This network grew slowly and steadily for close to 2 years - till summer of 2009, when close to 400 varied sites were unceremoniously dropped over a frighteningly short 2 day period.

          However, after careful examination, there were small, NEARLY undetectable points of commonality to most of these sites. These sent up a flag, and...well...you know the rest.

          Bottom line: Be careful. It CAN happen.

          And now, back to work...
          Google is a SPY AGENCY, you have to get up pretty early in the morning to pull one over on them. If you DO beat the odds, it will be short lived.
          https://porncorporation.com

          Comment

          • daveylapoo
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2003
            • 423

            #125
            Originally posted by Darrell
            If you don't mind me asking, what do you think were the points of commonality to most of your sites that google picked up on?
            To be honest, it's been 6 months and I'm still carefully trying to de-construct exactly what the penalty is and why it was applied.

            Near as I can tell it was a combination of tracking ID's along with a very similar (but NOT identical) contact form and tos template used across the sites.

            It has also occurred to me that I may have fallen under a blanket 'affiliate' penalty, whereby google determined that the sites in question were adding 'no real value' and therefore didn't belong in their SERPS - and used the points of commonality listed above to find them all.

            Example:

            - 8 sites with unique designs / original content which employ all discussed 'stealth factors' are in promotion of sponsor site A.
            - 3 of these sites are on the first page of Google (with the other 5 in the top 100) along with sponsor A's site.
            - Google notices these 8 sites have subtle points of commonality (ref codes, similar text, cms signature, etc) - and seem to talk a great deal about Site A.
            - While these 8 sites break no Google Webmaster Guidelines, it's clear that there sole existence is simply to get the visitor to sponsor site A - and as quickly as possible.
            - Big G asks the question "Why do we have 3 listings in our top 10 that are, for arguments sake, the exact same thing - this isn't helping our users"
            - Big G also notices that these 8 sites have a lot in common with these 32 other sites - and that these 32 have a lot in common with these other 84 sites...and so on...and so on...
            -You know the rest.

            Of course, sites like these make up half the internet...lucky me getting caught.

            I'm taking what happened as a glimpse into the 'future' of how Google will list results. The Big G is getting smarter and is relying more and more on factors such as bounce rates, time on site, and other 'user experience' type data.

            In my mind, the Search Engine of the future (whatever or whoever that might be), will be a highly evolved machine that ranks sites heavily based on USER EXPERIENCE. This is likely the hardest thing for an SEO'er to manipulate, and it makes sense that a smart SE would key in on it.

            Now, don't get me wrong, Content is STILL king, and on-site optimization, backlinks, and a sprinkle SEO 'magic' here and there all play a clutch role. And, if done right, can still get you to the top of the SE's...for now.

            I guess the moral of the story is that websites that offer no real value (affiliate or otherwise) have got their work cut out for them.

            Comment

            • daveylapoo
              Confirmed User
              • Dec 2003
              • 423

              #126
              Originally posted by baddog
              I am not sure who you are, but it sounds like you probably have a plan with dedicated IPs. Just an FYI: All of those plans allow for private nameservers. If you need assistance with how to do that, please do not hesitate to ask.
              My apologies Baddog, just checked my plan and there are indeed private nameservers available.

              Good to know.

              Comment

              • candyflip
                Carpe Visio
                • Jul 2002
                • 43069

                #127
                Originally posted by will76
                ...or you get a masters degree in SEO lol
                Funny you should mention it. I got info from an online university recently.

                They have an online marketing bachelors and master's program.

                Spend you some brain.
                Email Me

                Comment

                • martinsc
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 27047

                  #128
                  Make Money

                  Comment

                  • The Porn Nerd
                    Living The Dream
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 19784

                    #129
                    Hey baddog - GREAT post man! Quick question tho:

                    I run a network of 18 paysites, and I just switched to a dedicated hosting plan. I've left some of lesser-performing sites on the old hosting (which is a shared account). All my sites are currently linked together, with no outside link trades. (See here: www.misterpeabodyworld.com)

                    So just wondering if I should take every site in the network and get seperate hosting for each one? Or would just having the two hosts do? The idea of getting eighteen differant hosts, especially now that I've just switched to dedicated hosting ($500 a month, btw, as opposed to $20 a month for a shared account) seems daunting. Thanks!!
                    My Affiliate Programs:
                    Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold

                    Over 90 paysites to promote!
                    Now on Teams: peabodymedia

                    Comment

                    • webair
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 8531

                      #130
                      Useful link for basics on Search Engine Optimization http://bit.ly/cDmwyp


                      ~ Webair Dedicated Cloud Serversâ„¢ ~ WEBAIR VSYSâ„¢ Virtual Hosting Platform ~ Superior CDN Network ~
                      ~ Managed Dedicated hosting Specialists ~ DISCOUNT DOMAIN NAMES! ~ WEBAIR FUSION IO MANAGED CLOUD SERVERS! ~


                      ICQ: 243116321 - TWITTER - @WEBAIRINC - E-Mail: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • baddog
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Apr 2001
                        • 107089

                        #131
                        Originally posted by MisterPeabody
                        Hey baddog - GREAT post man! Quick question tho:

                        I run a network of 18 paysites, and I just switched to a dedicated hosting plan. I've left some of lesser-performing sites on the old hosting (which is a shared account). All my sites are currently linked together, with no outside link trades. (See here: www.misterpeabodyworld.com)

                        So just wondering if I should take every site in the network and get seperate hosting for each one? Or would just having the two hosts do? The idea of getting eighteen differant hosts, especially now that I've just switched to dedicated hosting ($500 a month, btw, as opposed to $20 a month for a shared account) seems daunting. Thanks!!
                        [If we understand the question] G has probably already seen the links between your sites. If the sites are different niches they are not competing for rankings, so it should not matter.

                        Comment

                        • will76
                          Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                          • May 2003
                          • 18037

                          #132
                          Originally posted by candyflip
                          Funny you should mention it. I got info from an online university recently.

                          They have an online marketing bachelors and master's program.
                          online university

                          I was talking about a real school lol.
                          ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                          PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                          FNCash | Media Revenue

                          Comment

                          • The Porn Nerd
                            Living The Dream
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 19784

                            #133
                            Originally posted by baddog
                            [If we understand the question] G has probably already seen the links between your sites. If the sites are different niches they are not competing for rankings, so it should not matter.
                            Gotcha, thanks! I understand now - you're saying the biggest advantage would be, SEO-wise, to the individual sites in the network. No problem. I was asking (in an unintelligible way, obviously) if this would help the NETWORK's SEO-ranking, and if having all my sites on differant IPs would help not just the individual site's rankings, but the Network as well (as in, when people search for the network's hame via Google).

                            Anyway, thanks!
                            My Affiliate Programs:
                            Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold

                            Over 90 paysites to promote!
                            Now on Teams: peabodymedia

                            Comment

                            • HighlyIntoxicated
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2009
                              • 542

                              #134
                              that was very informative, thanks for taking the time to write it up.

                              Comment

                              • candyflip
                                Carpe Visio
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 43069

                                #135
                                Originally posted by will76
                                online university

                                I was talking about a real school lol.
                                It's Full Sail, I think. I lived in Orlando and know that they have a pretty nice campus.

                                They are an accredited university, I do know that much.

                                Here's the link to the Master's Program:

                                http://www.fullsail.edu/online/degre...keting-masters

                                Spend you some brain.
                                Email Me

                                Comment

                                Working...