GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News US economy has shrunk by 2.9% last quarter (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1143913)

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 09:11 AM

US economy has shrunk by 2.9% last quarter
 
http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-g...ter-1403699600

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, contracted at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 2.9% in the first three months of the year, according to the Commerce Department's third reading released Wednesday. That was the fastest rate of decline since the first quarter of 2009, when output fell 5.4%, and matches the average pace of declines during the recession.

I keep hearing people saying that the economy is getting better, where do they get their information?

Rochard 06-25-2014 09:32 AM

I knew I could count on you to take this and make into a huge thing.

http://www.rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/jerk.gif

We've had five years of economic growth and we had one bad quarter and your panties are all in bunch?

Klen 06-25-2014 09:33 AM

Thanks Obama

Klen 06-25-2014 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136551)
I knew I could count on you to take this and make into a huge thing.

http://www.rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/jerk.gif

We've had five years of economic growth and we had one bad quarter and your panties are all in bunch?

That is how it work in republican camp.

GregE 06-25-2014 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136528)
http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-g...ter-1403699600

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, contracted at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 2.9% in the first three months of the year, according to the Commerce Department's third reading released Wednesday. That was the fastest rate of decline since the first quarter of 2009, when output fell 5.4%, and matches the average pace of declines during the recession.

I keep hearing people saying that the economy is getting better, where do they get their information?

I've always been inclined to direct my anger at those who actually cause a problem as opposed to assigning the blame to the repair crew.

Your mileage clearly varies.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136551)
I knew I could count on you to take this and make into a huge thing.

http://www.rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/jerk.gif

We've had five years of economic growth and we had one bad quarter and your panties are all in bunch?

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily...172130204.html

A new study published by the Russell Sage foundation helps explain why many families feel like they?re falling behind: They actually are. The study, which measures the average wealth of U.S. households by income level, reveals a startling decline in wealth nationwide. The median household in 2013 had a net worth of just $56,335 -- 43% lower than the median wealth level right before the recession began in 2007, and 36% lower than a decade ago. ?There are very few signs of significant recovery from the losses in wealth suffered by American families during the Great Recession,? the study concludes.

So please, enlighten us and show us where the economy is getting better?

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GregE (Post 20136562)
I've always been inclined to direct my anger at those who actually cause a problem as opposed to assigning the blame to the repair crew.

Your mileage clearly varies.

I'm inclined to blame those that say it's getting better when it's clearly not. I can blame the last guy for starting it, but it won't do any good as he's not in office any more and can't do anything. The guy in office won't do anything.

MaDalton 06-25-2014 09:49 AM

can we change the board name to "Whining about Obama & program discussion"?

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 20136595)
can we change the board name to "Whining about Obama & program discussion"?

You don't think fucking around covers that?

Only reason I posted this is because Rochard is always saying the economy has got better, I show him proof that it has not and then the excuses start.

I'm fucking around with Rochard who says I'm on ignore, but always answers.

And I'm not the first one to mention Obama in this thread

crockett 06-25-2014 10:04 AM

http://www.nairaland.com/attachments...0ea3cb0ae47985

crockett 06-25-2014 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136615)
You don't think fucking around covers that?

Only reason I posted this is because Rochard is always saying the economy has got better, I show him proof that it has not and then the excuses start.

I'm fucking around with Rochard who says I'm on ignore, but always answers.

And I'm not the first one to mention Obama in this thread

Oh my look people Vendillza is right the one bad quarter in 4 years is all the proof we needed. I mean we "finally get it" Obama, Obama, Obama.. It's the end of the world folks, back your bags and head to Mexico.. It's over..

MaDalton 06-25-2014 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136615)
You don't think fucking around covers that?

not anymore

Rochard 06-25-2014 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136582)
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily...172130204.html

A new study published by the Russell Sage foundation helps explain why many families feel like they?re falling behind: They actually are. The study, which measures the average wealth of U.S. households by income level, reveals a startling decline in wealth nationwide. The median household in 2013 had a net worth of just $56,335 -- 43% lower than the median wealth level right before the recession began in 2007, and 36% lower than a decade ago. ?There are very few signs of significant recovery from the losses in wealth suffered by American families during the Great Recession,? the study concludes.

So please, enlighten us and show us where the economy is getting better?

Sure, let me explain it to you. I'll type slow to help you understand.

Your article says:
The median household in 2013 had a net worth of just $56,335 -- 43% lower than the median wealth level right before the recession began in 2007, and 36% lower than a decade ago.

The article says we are down since the recession. Of course, the recession wiped us out in 2007-2009. Since then we've been getting better.

You are here whining about five years of economic growth. I know you hate Obama, but man, face reality already.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136661)
Sure, let me explain it to you. I'll type slow to help you understand.

Your article says:
The median household in 2013 had a net worth of just $56,335 -- 43% lower than the median wealth level right before the recession began in 2007, and 36% lower than a decade ago.

The article says we are down since the recession. Of course, the recession wiped us out in 2007-2009. Since then we've been getting better.

You are here whining about five years of economic growth. I know you hate Obama, but man, face reality already.

Obama was given a Democrat-majority Congress upon winning the White House in 2008. He got a $787 billion stimulus, a $410 billion omnibus, health care reform, financial regulation reform, and a jobs bill passed within his first 2 years in office, along with increments of quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve.

Every time there has been a recession, there has been a recovery, the worse the recession, the faster the recovery. Under Obama, we still have not recovered completely.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterfer...t-president/2/

You don't like being called names? Don't talk down to me shit for brains!

Klen 06-25-2014 10:49 AM

Anyway,i dont think politics influence economy too much if people are innovative enough,i concluded that when seeing how some countries are still in good standing despise having also bad and corrupted politicians.

Rochard 06-25-2014 10:53 AM

Let me explain this better. I will do this using apples.

http://serenapoon.com/blog/wp-conten.../applebite.jpg

You spend your entire life collecting apples for your retirement, and you've collected 100 apples. This is called your "apple net worth". But the recession comes and you loose 60% of your apples, and now your apple net worth is "40 apples".

As the economy gets better you start collecting more apples again. After a few years you've collected another ten apples, bringing your apple net worth to 50 apples.

You still have less than 100 apples, which makes your apple net worth look smaller. However, the truth is you have ten more apples than the forty you had a few years ago, thus your apple net worth is up.

Rochard 06-25-2014 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136669)
Obama was given a Democrat-majority Congress upon winning the White House in 2008. He got a $787 billion stimulus, a $410 billion omnibus, health care reform, financial regulation reform, and a jobs bill passed within his first 2 years in office, along with increments of quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve.

Every time there has been a recession, there has been a recovery, the worse the recession, the faster the recovery. Under Obama, we still have not recovered completely.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterfer...t-president/2/

And the end result is we have five years of economic growth.

Our net worth is also up, as is our median income.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136669)
You don't like being called names? Don't talk down to me shit for brains!

Oh, you are gonna love my post about the apples!

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 20136703)
Anyway,i dont think politics influence economy too much if people are innovative enough,i concluded that when seeing how some countries are still in good standing despise having also bad and corrupted politicians.

Corrupted is one thing, this is different.

Business's just think this is not a good time to expand, that's one of the reasons that Obama delayed the employer mandate for Obamacare with a executive order.

Regulations have killed so many business's here in California and it keeps getting tougher.
People are making less, yet I just heard that out in the desert near here, they just added a $150 fire tax on all buildings on your property. This is not an increase, it's a new tax! This is happening all over the place.

under Reagan it was worse and it recovered in 28 months and kept growing, we are at 5 1/2 years now and still haven't recovered completely. Too many people are underemployed

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136715)
And the end result is we have five years of economic growth.

Our net worth is also up, as is our median income.



Oh, you are gonna love my post about the apples!

LOL, Median income is down as a whole under Obama, show me where you are getting your bullshit news from!

Rochard 06-25-2014 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136722)
LOL, Median income is down as a whole under Obama, show me where you are getting your bullshit news from!

Sure.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/22/us...peak.html?_r=0

Klen 06-25-2014 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136717)
Corrupted is one thing, this is different.

Business's just think this is not a good time to expand, that's one of the reasons that Obama delayed the employer mandate for Obamacare with a executive order.

Regulations have killed so many business's here in California and it keeps getting tougher.
People are making less, yet I just heard that out in the desert near here, they just added a $150 fire tax on all buildings on your property. This is not an increase, it's a new tax! This is happening all over the place.

under Reagan it was worse and it recovered in 28 months and kept growing, we are at 5 1/2 years now and still haven't recovered completely. Too many people are underemployed

So you claim how it was better during Schwarzenegger era ?

tony286 06-25-2014 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136717)
Corrupted is one thing, this is different.

Business's just think this is not a good time to expand, that's one of the reasons that Obama delayed the employer mandate for Obamacare with a executive order.

Regulations have killed so many business's here in California and it keeps getting tougher.
People are making less, yet I just heard that out in the desert near here, they just added a $150 fire tax on all buildings on your property. This is not an increase, it's a new tax! This is happening all over the place.

under Reagan it was worse and it recovered in 28 months and kept growing, we are at 5 1/2 years now and still haven't recovered completely. Too many people are underemployed

No it wasnt, the banking system almost collapsed. Thats not the president that's wall st telling big corp what to do.

NaughtyVisions 06-25-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136615)
And I'm not the first one to mention Obama in this thread

I guess you don't understand sarcasm?


Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 20136554)
Thanks Obama

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 20136559)
That is how it work in republican camp.


Vendzilla 06-25-2014 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136747)

I hope you see where your post says it's down 6%?

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20136755)
No it wasnt, the banking system almost collapsed. Thats not the president that's wall st telling big corp what to do.

Oh Really?

Do you know what increments of quantitative easing from the Federal Reserve is these days?

Last I saw it was still 85 billion a month!

Apparently According to your train of thought, the banking system is still almost collapsing, I mean why would we continue to give the banks that much money. Or maybe that much money to GM, we got a bunch of recalled cars for that little investment!

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 20136751)
So you claim how it was better during Schwarzenegger era ?

Never said that, I never will.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions (Post 20136761)
I guess you don't understand sarcasm?

That statement I made was Sarcasm

Rochard 06-25-2014 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136774)
I hope you see where your post says it's down 6%?

Yes. Let me explain this again with apples.

In 2006 you have 100 apples. In 2007 you have 40 apples because of the recession. In 2012 you have 60 apples.

You are still down from 2006, but up from 2007.

Eyes. Open. Click.

SuckOnThis 06-25-2014 12:02 PM

Funny how when Bush was president idiot right wingers kept claiming the president has nothing to do with the economy.


http://savagehenrymagazine.com/wp-co...sh-640x330.jpg

kane 06-25-2014 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136582)
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily...172130204.html

A new study published by the Russell Sage foundation helps explain why many families feel like they?re falling behind: They actually are. The study, which measures the average wealth of U.S. households by income level, reveals a startling decline in wealth nationwide. The median household in 2013 had a net worth of just $56,335 -- 43% lower than the median wealth level right before the recession began in 2007, and 36% lower than a decade ago. ?There are very few signs of significant recovery from the losses in wealth suffered by American families during the Great Recession,? the study concludes.

So please, enlighten us and show us where the economy is getting better?

This is no shock to me. A little while back I read that during the recession 60% of the jobs that were lost were what they called middle income jobs. This means jobs where the people made somewhere between about $18-$35 per hour. The rest of the job losses were split pretty evenly between lower paying and higher paying jobs.

Since the recovery began only about 20% of the new jobs created have been middle income jobs. About 20% of them have been higher paying jobs and about 60% of them have been lower paying jobs.

There are a ton of people out there that lost a job that they could live a decent life on and have had to take a job that makes much less.

crockett 06-25-2014 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136806)
Yes. Let me explain this again with apples.

In 2006 you have 100 apples. In 2007 you have 40 apples because of the recession. In 2012 you have 60 apples.

You are still down from 2006, but up from 2007.

Eyes. Open. Click.

I dunno why people continue to argue with him. You are never going to prove anything to him because he will never accept any proof that does not go along with what he thinks he already knows.

Just point and laugh or ignore him all together, trying to reason with him will never get you anywhere because he's unreasonable. He lives in a very Red vs Blue world in which anything that is blue is bad and anything that is red in good.

Klen 06-25-2014 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136799)
Never said that, I never will.

Well maybe then problem is too big to be resolved by a common politician.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 20136918)
Well maybe then problem is too big to be resolved by a common politician.

We have had many presidents that have risen to the occasion, this is seems is not one of those times.

Yes Bush got us in a mess, most of which was after his hands were tied by a democrat controlled congress that started 17 months after the recession started.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20136907)
This is no shock to me. A little while back I read that during the recession 60% of the jobs that were lost were what they called middle income jobs. This means jobs where the people made somewhere between about $18-$35 per hour. The rest of the job losses were split pretty evenly between lower paying and higher paying jobs.

Since the recovery began only about 20% of the new jobs created have been middle income jobs. About 20% of them have been higher paying jobs and about 60% of them have been lower paying jobs.

There are a ton of people out there that lost a job that they could live a decent life on and have had to take a job that makes much less.

I was watching Jon Stewart a couple weeks ago about this subject, he was the one that kept bringing up that the new jobs generated were lower paying jobs, where other fields were losing jobs that paid higher wages.
This country has not been expanding on better paying jobs like it should. But hey, walmart is doing fine......

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20136806)
Yes. Let me explain this again with apples.

In 2006 you have 100 apples. In 2007 you have 40 apples because of the recession. In 2012 you have 60 apples.

You are still down from 2006, but up from 2007.

Eyes. Open. Click.

So what you are saying is that you work on an apple cart?

"The average family," he said in the March 8, 2014, weekly Republican address, is "now bringing home $4,000 less than they did just five years ago."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...rning-4000-le/

BTW, this is 2014, try to keep up!

kane 06-25-2014 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136934)
I was watching Jon Stewart a couple weeks ago about this subject, he was the one that kept bringing up that the new jobs generated were lower paying jobs, where other fields were losing jobs that paid higher wages.
This country has not been expanding on better paying jobs like it should. But hey, walmart is doing fine......

The crazy thing is that many of the companies that went out of business during the recession are making a comeback either by re-opening or new companies taking their places. However, since they are starting over they are doing it offshore. So these companies are making nice profits, the stock market is going strong. Wall street is awash in money, but the middle class is still struggling.

I don't drop all of this on Obama. I think this is the result of 20+ years of different polices from different administrations finally coming to a head.

Barry-xlovecam 06-25-2014 01:50 PM

Quote:

Current estimates put second-quarter growth in the neighborhood of 3% annualized growth, which only goes to show that "it's not how far you fall, it's how high you bounce that counts."

http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...ow-high-y.aspx
The NYSE is rockin' the DJ and NASDAQ are doing great. Our customers are spending. Germany, Japan and the UK are way up this quarter -- I make my money there too.

We are supposed to be part of the Internet Global Economy and make our money all over the world. If you are too dependent on one nation's economics today it's a problem. There is no reason for any of us to be so localized. (Unless we are just posers, flipping burgers or driving a taxi ...)

Rochard 06-25-2014 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20136912)
I dunno why people continue to argue with him. You are never going to prove anything to him because he will never accept any proof that does not go along with what he thinks he already knows.

Just point and laugh or ignore him all together, trying to reason with him will never get you anywhere because he's unreasonable. He lives in a very Red vs Blue world in which anything that is blue is bad and anything that is red in good.

I work from home and I need the amusement.

Vendzilla 06-25-2014 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 20136973)
The crazy thing is that many of the companies that went out of business during the recession are making a comeback either by re-opening or new companies taking their places. However, since they are starting over they are doing it offshore. So these companies are making nice profits, the stock market is going strong. Wall street is awash in money, but the middle class is still struggling.

I don't drop all of this on Obama. I think this is the result of 20+ years of different polices from different administrations finally coming to a head.

It's the result of all of them over time, but Obama is saying just the opposite every time he gives a speech. And he is offering up no solutions.

One of the major things I blame is NAFTA, Hillary during her campaign in 2008 said it needs to updated, well that has not happened.
And why was China given a favored trade status in the first place?

Rochard 06-25-2014 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20136956)
So what you are saying is that you work on an apple cart?

"The average family," he said in the March 8, 2014, weekly Republican address, is "now bringing home $4,000 less than they did just five years ago."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...rning-4000-le/

BTW, this is 2014, try to keep up!

Are you sure about this?

I know you like to cherry pick your stats, but if you read the article (and the disclaimer) and then follow it all the way through to the spreadsheet.... You discover that in 2007 the average wage was $61,355 and in 2012 it is $62,241. That's median income. If you do mean income in 2007 the average was $78,845 and in 2012 it's $82,843.

Seems to me that in both cases - mean and median averages - income is up in 2012 compared to 2007. Of course, this does't fact in 2013.

Keep in mind that while our economy should be the number one concern the Republican party is doing everything it can to fight the President on every issue possible - this morning they announced they were considering sueing him.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc