are sites michellelynn.com pedo sites?
 

i think if you get off on: http://www.michellelynn.com/
you have pedo issues

Are you a real noob or just playing noob to get some more sig exposure ?

if that model is 18 - there is no issue.

i don't see anythign wrong with dressing someone up to look younger or older for sexual pleasure - so long as the model is 18+

© 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche


spaz

No you have issues. Wtf.

Search up the def. for pedo.

in some countries (like the uk) there are laws against "Pesudo Child Porn"

Whoever voted no has got to be having a fucking laugh.

I actually voted number 3 but I can't really say unless I see her birth certificate. She may be as old as she is made to look, about 14.

This site panders to all the pedos out there, even if she is 18 or older she certainly doesn't look and she is actually made to look a lot younger.

At the end of the day if you wank over this you are getting off on a girl who looks 14 years old, now that can't be right.

ok why not!: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pedophile

Noun 1. pedophile - an adult who is sexually attracted to children


the model on that site _looks_ like a child (even though it says shes 18+)

its teen dude

100% agreed. If they are over 18 yrs old, everything else is a moot point.

OK so if she is 18 then it's not illegal (I suppose) but does that make it OK?

she is portrayed as underage and that IS wrong and IS pandering to pedos

90% of the teen sites are using legal 18+ girls with kiddie faces that look way younger than 18 , of course all of them declare that they are over 18 so officially they dont pesudo childporn .Your poll is either comming from naive point or sigwhoring interest .

Well girls can be 17 or 18 you cant notice differenet.

don't see what the issue is she's 18....

she just has a young look to her

look at all of the teen revenue sites i think a couple of those girls look younger then michelle does...

and if your not promoting niche money you should give michelle lynn a shot she converts pretty dam good on teen traffic

thats what ID's are for buddy :thumbsup

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/child

child Pronunciation (chld)
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. a. An unborn infant; a fetus.
b. An infant; a baby.


Puberty = 12 y.o.
She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo.

End of thread.

she is 18+ forsure...

hey elron with the pseudo child pedo site http://www.virginz.net/v2/ in his sig!
I am not sigwhoring just asking a question

Maybe not, but number 3 in the poll sums it up.

I may not be pedo but it is certainly pandering to pedos, if you get off on 14 year old girls, doesn't matter if she is 18 she is made to look 14, then you are a pedo or at least a wannabe pedo.

tell that to the US2257 inspectors when they come to visit!

And???? .

She is 18+ and has 2752 on file.

I see no problem.

what about if they are 18 but they look 5 years old is that ok?

No you are not.

Pedo = person who is attracted to children.
Child = anyone under 12 years old.

Yes, thats OK.

I dunno where you live kazakstan or something but in the western world the the law says its 18 years old

real question is - Should under age surfers be allowed to post on GFY and make comments about sites they know nothing about?

and if the ID says 18 and you have all the docs to back it up then what?

If you wank over a 14 year old girl you ARE either a pedo or a wannabe pedo or a future pedo, simple as that.

What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children.

he's not underage he use to run digibucks now known as members money... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

do a search for digibucks i'm sure you'll find something more interesting than this bullshite

anyone under the age of 18 is considered a child...

The law says 18 years old is what?


I just gave you a definition for pedophile.

Pedo = a person who is attracted to children under puberty (that means under 12 y/o)

Wrong. Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a minor.

Child = anyone under the age of puberty.

if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP... now if you shot an 18 year old that looked like a 17 year old what would happen nothing...

The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.

There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.

You are wrong.

You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"

I love when my wife dresses up as a schoolgirl it turns me on :winkwink:

there are going to be people at both extremes on this

some will say she looks way younger then 18 so its wrong
others will says shes over 18 so it doesnt matter

promote it if you have teen traffic and you want it to convert and ignore it if you don't.

it business and thats it.


spaz

yea maybe you should stop posting