GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   All Jokes aside, Do you think McCain had a chance if he didn't... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=867089)

Semi-Retired-Dave 11-04-2008 11:09 PM

All Jokes aside, Do you think McCain had a chance if he didn't...
 
Choose Palin as his running mate? Did she kill it for him?

selena 11-04-2008 11:13 PM

I wasn't very enthusiastic about him prior to that selection, but was the deal breaker for me. She did get the right wing conservatives whipped up, but she also alienated moderate conservatives in a big way.

LiveDose 11-04-2008 11:17 PM

I think he should have voted against the bailout and used that issue as a hail mary.

Mutt 11-04-2008 11:17 PM

wouldn't have made the difference for him - but i think when the election gets analyzed more they'll say she was a negative - Palin is 'preaching to the choir', she definitely appealed to the core of the Republican party but those people were going to vote McCain anyway. They hoped she would help the ticket grab a significant number of estranged and disappointed Hillary Clinton female supporters - and it looks like that backfired - Clinton's pantsuit brigade are college educated liberal women - Palin may look like them but her views on practically everything including a woman's right to choice on abortion repulsed them and instead of sitting out this election she provoked those ladies into action for Obama.

baddog 11-04-2008 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave (Post 15007612)
Choose Palin as his running mate? Did she kill it for him?

Palin was what killed it for him for sure.

ronaldo 11-04-2008 11:18 PM

I honestly don't believe he had a chance, even if he had Ronald Reagan's corpse as his running mate. Bush killed it for any Republican this election. But, choosing Palin didn't help him. Hell, Reagan's corpse would have out debated Palin.

Most women saw through what they were trying to do within minutes of the announcement.

Almost Evil 11-04-2008 11:23 PM

I think he shot himself in the foot by choosing her as a running mate. I wasnt super fond of Obama, and was leaning toward McCain. That changed the minute he chose Palin. :2 cents:

After Shock Media 11-04-2008 11:24 PM

If he would not done all the mistakes he did verbally, campaign wise, so forth and then maybe he would of had a shot. Palin was just part of the iceberg. Honestly he very well could of made it damn close or had it if not for the combined effect of ever goof.

Oh and not using technology much, and depending on a past republican ground game without nurturing it at all did not help.

Malicious Biz 11-04-2008 11:26 PM

Bush built the coffin.. palin was the final nail in it.

mikeyddddd 11-04-2008 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronaldo (Post 15007651)
Bush killed it for any Republican this election.

But, McCain was the only Republican who could have distanced himself from Bush and even had a chance to win.

Running as the 2000 McCain and not going so negative he may have won - without Palin.

Staying a maverick, instead of being a pair of mavericks, might have been enough for him.

mikesouth 11-04-2008 11:43 PM

palin is what doomed him

he needed the independent vote and he would have gotten far more, maybe even mine had he not picked her

she polled massively unfavorable with independents and thats what cost him

pocketkangaroo 11-04-2008 11:45 PM

If he picked Romney or someone else who could be strong on economics, I think he would have had a good shot.

WinstonTriplexcash 11-04-2008 11:46 PM

Palin was a big contribution to macCain's failed bid.

PXN 11-04-2008 11:50 PM

I don't think he'll win either way, but without Palin she would have done a lot better. After 8 yrs of Bush it so bad even my dog can get elected.

uno 11-04-2008 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose (Post 15007645)
I think he should have voted against the bailout and used that issue as a hail mary.

That is partially how I view things.

1) His choice of Palin will go down as one of the worst vp choices in a long time.

2) He gave a speech stating quite emphatically that the "fundamentals of the economy are strong" and two hours later delivered another speech and basically said "omfg just kidding before, we're in deep shit, i need to suspend my campaign and fly to washington, lol :(."

3) If he voted against the bailout... er um... rescue package... he would have done a large part to get the middle of the country, where most of the population resides and would have helped him bolster his former "maverick" image.

Corleone 11-04-2008 11:52 PM

financial crisis, palin and a horrible campaign. grandpa can retire now

Hank_Heartland 11-04-2008 11:54 PM

No, George Bush killed it for him...but he also helped:thumbsup

webmasterchecks 11-05-2008 12:01 AM

if that and the economy didnt do what it did a month ago, i think it would have been 50/50 or so

Machete_ 11-05-2008 12:09 AM

The republicans are facing the same trouble a lot of "conservative" parties here in Europe. They have moved to far left to appeal to the leftish votes. They now preach a message that aren't backed by actions. You cant have a Liberal/Conservative Party that insists on more and more control and centralization

The republicans deserved to loose. They shouldn't have put Palin in that spot. They should have put someone who knew how to do the job, instead of pleasing the demographics.


There is one thing the americans should be pround of in this election - and that is the amount of new voters

crockett 11-05-2008 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave (Post 15007612)
Choose Palin as his running mate? Did she kill it for him?

McCain for the first time today in his campaign spoke like the McCain of 00. Had that McCain ran, I think he would have had a very good chance. The McCain of 00 wouldn't have ever picked Palin.

Iron Fist 11-05-2008 12:16 AM

Maybe it's worth mentioning how much SNL parodied Palin and McCain and linking them to Bush over and over again. And people HATED Bush... no wonder the little rat never showed his face during the campaign.

seeric 11-05-2008 12:21 AM

he lost because of george bush.
he lost because people are tired of the same old.
he lost because the world thinks the citizens of this country are not in charge of their republic.
he lost because he's old.
he lost because the economy is beyond repair by his party.
he lost because his platform was a fairytale.
he lost because it was time for change.
the list goes on and on.
the people spoke.
i welcome it, even if it gets worse before better.
fuck the good old boys network. good fucking riddance cocksmokers. eat a dickup till you hickup.

onlymovies 11-05-2008 12:23 AM

Being republican, i'm so glad my party lost. I'm so fucking embarrased....

Fuckers are just plain out stupid. Their whole campaign, the Palin choice, and all their bullshit...how COULD anyone think they would win? Nothing made any sense. McCain/Palin was the best choice? WTF is wrong with people. And on top of that, watching my party step all over Ron Paul (who i would have loved to heard more from) just goes to show that they deserve everything they get.

Stupid republican fucks...karma's a motherfuckin' bitch.......

Matt 26z 11-05-2008 12:43 AM

Someone posted this question at FreeRepublic and they got slammed for it. All of the responses were that Palin is the only reason they voted for McCain (these people presumably would not have voted at all otherwise).

But, yes, Palin absolutely disgusted the left and I think time will tell that the center was afraid of her becoming president.

PXN 11-05-2008 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlymovies (Post 15007906)
Being republican, i'm so glad my party lost. I'm so fucking embarrased....

Fuckers are just plain out stupid. Their whole campaign, the Palin choice, and all their bullshit...how COULD anyone think they would win? Nothing made any sense. McCain/Palin was the best choice? WTF is wrong with people. And on top of that, watching my party step all over Ron Paul (who i would have loved to heard more from) just goes to show that they deserve everything they get.

Stupid republican fucks...karma's a motherfuckin' bitch.......

I like Ron Paul and think he would be a better Candidate. I like his fiscal conservative view. But I think he'll can't beat Obama too even if he won the Republic nomination. His voice sounds weird. Sound like a woman moaning. Sorry I don't mean to offend Mr. Paul, but everytime he open his mouth I hear a woman moaning.

After Shock Media 11-05-2008 12:57 AM

I know it will sound like a joke, but he also lost because of the tubes. OK I am being serious here. The tubes (youtube in particular) really was around to show every mistake someone makes, the shit they are saying in another area, or some skit or appearance you could of missed if you did not catch it when it aired.

NTSS 11-05-2008 01:02 AM

He lost because of Palin 1st and Bush 2nd.

60% of actual voters had a negative opinion of her and the majority of those voters, voted for Obama. (I forget the actual number).

We all know how Bush affected everything.


I believe McCain could have overcome the Bush effect had he not picked Palin as his running mate. It would have been a much closer race and he may have even won.

It's true that Palin ignited the right-wing conservative republican base, however she failed to pull in the Hillary supporters as expected. She was just too far right.

NTSS 11-05-2008 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media (Post 15007980)
I know it will sound like a joke, but he also lost because of the tubes. OK I am being serious here. The tubes (youtube in particular) really was around to show every mistake someone makes, the shit they are saying in another area, or some skit or appearance you could of missed if you did not catch it when it aired.

I believe it had a lot to do with it. As a matter of fact I just closed up shop and deleted all my vids...lol

V_RocKs 11-05-2008 02:49 AM

Couple things:

If he had picked an actual running mate...
If he wasn't so quick to get pissed off about shit...
If the Right Wing Republican Christians didn't LIE about the effects of a NO vote on 8.

I might have considered it...

Had he said that he would make it his first duty to put Karl Rove on trial, it would have been a slam dunk for me.

NikKay 11-05-2008 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 15007647)
wouldn't have made the difference for him - but i think when the election gets analyzed more they'll say she was a negative - Palin is 'preaching to the choir', she definitely appealed to the core of the Republican party but those people were going to vote McCain anyway. They hoped she would help the ticket grab a significant number of estranged and disappointed Hillary Clinton female supporters - and it looks like that backfired - Clinton's pantsuit brigade are college educated liberal women - Palin may look like them but her views on practically everything including a woman's right to choice on abortion repulsed them and instead of sitting out this election she provoked those ladies into action for Obama.

This certainly rings true for me. I intended to sit out on this one because I wasn't sold on either candidate. Palin frustrated me so much I had to vote against her.

AngusAl 11-05-2008 07:42 AM

The entire Palin thing was a HUGE mistake! But I honestly don't think there was a REPUBLICAN on the planet that could have overcome the damage BUSH has done.
But what i think really sealed it was this simple.
If McCain did NOT put ANY more research or thought into his VP (considering every sign/bumper sticker/ commercial/ news cast/ etc) is going to have MCCAIN/PALIN branding the two of them together. Then i think everyone questioned "what kind of other HUGE mistakes will this guy make as president"
Just my my thoughts........GO OBAMA!!

Drake 11-05-2008 09:20 AM

If the Palin we saw at the RNC (competent, knowledgeable, moderate, genuine fiscal conservative) was the true Palin, the race would have been close, if not a victory for McCain even in this Democratic year.

The only question that would remain is if he still could have managed the storm caused by the economic crash. Would his reaction have been different if he had a runningmate knowlegeable about the economy? We'll never know, but his reaction was the nail in the coffin. The timing was perfect for Obama. It was pure luck. The crash could have come a month after the election rather than before it.

The voting demographics/percentages were pretty similar to previous elections (eg. most blacks and women voted Democratic, slightly over half of whites voted Republican) with the exception of the Latino and youth vote which gave Obama a much needed advantage.

Aside from the Palin choice, this election was shaped largely by circumstances outside of each candidate's control. The economic crisis, the changes in the electorate, generational gap (Obama the young/new, McCain the old guard).

It's interesting that war veterans running for President haven't faired well in the past 20 years.

ninavain 11-05-2008 09:40 AM

:thumbsup:thumbsup
Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 15007905)
he lost because of george bush.
he lost because people are tired of the same old.
he lost because the world thinks the citizens of this country are not in charge of their republic.
he lost because he's old.
he lost because the economy is beyond repair by his party.
he lost because his platform was a fairytale.
he lost because it was time for change.
the list goes on and on.
the people spoke.
i welcome it, even if it gets worse before better.
fuck the good old boys network. good fucking riddance cocksmokers. eat a dickup till you hickup.


GatorB 11-05-2008 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena (Post 15007637)
I wasn't very enthusiastic about him prior to that selection, but was the deal breaker for me. She did get the right wing conservatives whipped up, but she also alienated moderate conservatives in a big way.

Yeah she killed any chance he had of getting my vote. MCcain's time as in 2000 but the GOP was too stupid and nominated Bush. Back then they couldn't stand McCain now in 2008 they love him? Does that even make any kind of sense? I like republicans to explain why in 2000 McCain was a piece of shit and yet in 2008 he's your guy?

thehand 11-05-2008 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 15007905)
he lost because of george bush.

I believe this to be the number one reason.

Palin didn't help though :1orglaugh

GatorB 11-05-2008 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thehand (Post 15009358)
I believe this to be the number one reason.

Palin didn't help though :1orglaugh

See Plain was the female version of George Bush. So it's hard for McCain to seperate himself from Bush when his running mate reminds everyone of George Bush. I still say Romney would have been a better choice and McCain could have won.

Tom_PM 11-05-2008 10:00 AM

I think what killed it for him was his decisions to get all cozy with the exact same people he had pushed away from after 2000, and in so doing gained another notch in is Maverick label that started with his rants on spending bills.

I dont think any vp pick would have turned the tide. It was like he was born again, then died again, then ran for president.. not gonna work.

Semi-Retired-Dave 11-05-2008 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 15007773)
If he picked Romney or someone else who could be strong on economics, I think he would have had a good shot.

I agree with you 100%
He played politics by bringing her because of her being a woman and it seemed to work the first 2 weeks until she spoke.

Paul Markham 11-05-2008 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo (Post 15007773)
If he picked Romney or someone else who could be strong on economics, I think he would have had a good shot.

What amazed me was the actual vote. The popular vote was very close and that's amazing when you list the mistakes.

Bush, Iraq, economy, fat cat bankers and CEOs, Palin, the campaign and his age should of all factored in and he should of been buried. But it ended up with him being 3-4% short of getting more votes than Obama. Maybe with a decent running mate and a decent campaign he could of pulled it off.

The big question for me is why did 46.3% think him and Palin were a better bet than Obama and Biden? Now that is scary.

Semi-Retired-Dave 11-05-2008 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 15010137)
What amazed me was the actual vote. The popular vote was very close and that's amazing when you list the mistakes.

Bush, Iraq, economy, fat cat bankers and CEOs, Palin, the campaign and his age should of all factored in and he should of been buried. But it ended up with him being 3-4% short of getting more votes than Obama. Maybe with a decent running mate and a decent campaign he could of pulled it off.

The big question for me is why did 46.3% think him and Palin were a better bet than Obama and Biden? Now that is scary.

That is scary,why? Not sure!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc