DEA - Banned for Life
 

sad day :321GFY

Shame, was enjoying learning more about who fucked everyone over.

Damn, that's kind of disturbing actually.

What did he do? ANyone got a link?

If it was over what I think it is, he was just speaking the truth, even if it was beating a dead horse.

I hope he starts posting on that other board where sponsors chat as I'd like to know what the story is.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=1016361

http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/1016361-dollarmachine-python-com-shaliza-somani-epassporte-scam.html

Great news

so he was banned for posting the truth?

Yep, it truly is sad when someone who has been warned with two prior bannings continues to post unproven information as well as peoples personal information.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

seriously, what are you talking about? he posted their website up that clearly shows they're a couple..

Lots of people have been banned over the years for speaking the truth.

Just say'n :Oh crap

What exactly does that have to do with python and dollarmachine = her or epassporte?

Didn't Micheal O back up what DEA said about her and ePass? If anyone knows, HE does. :2 cents:

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what is going on there.

Once again, what Does that have to with python and dollarmachine.

the context that DEA puts it in makes it clear that by pushing traffic to either python or dollarmachine you are making Shaliza "rich"

wich assuming she is married to the owner of those programs is kind of true ? I am not married, but if I would be and my biz is doing good my wife is also going to be better off then when my biz is going downhill ... right ?

I can imagine people who have lost lots of money with epassporte dont want to do biz with anything/ anybody related to it in anyway and most definatly not help them make more money ?

Shaliza it seems was not some low level support rep , but rather high up advising Chris Mallick on serious stuff. .and even owned 5% of the biz ? so anyone who lost money .. has lost it also to her

and so if she is married to the owner of a program ... that makes it kind of messy .. and some people I can imagine would avoid doing biz with that peticular program ...

if all of this is true of course! :2 cents:

Who cares? Why protect them or why the need to? If she really had any ownership interest in epassporte then it is relevant what she is doing in the industry because she would not be just a mere employee. I'm not interested in harassing her or anything but a lot of people lost money and one guy even killed himself. I don't agree with stalking her offline or any of that crap but if she is in the industry what she does should be fair game and people should have a right to know.

You can do what you like on your board but I think this looks really bad. It makes it further look like you don't care about the actual people in the community.

http://www.gfy.com/18014996-post28.html

I think Michael's post alone should open up your eyes as to DEA being 100% correct :2 cents:

That is what I was thinking aswell. Seemed fair to me for him to be posting what looked like proof of other programs/people linked to epass.

Like people saying "don't buy middle men, because it was produced by mallick"

I do have to say that DEA is an asshat, but I also believe MichaelO is an upstanding GFY citizen, no matter who he used to work for.

Well that fucking sucks :2 cents:

.

That took some guts to speak out in that way. Kudos to him.

Her connection to the python owner isn't just a regular husband-wife connection either. It's different because she apparently previously had an ownership interest within the industry (epassporte) and was in a managerial role. She's not just the normal innocent spouse of a program owner. That makes it different. They could have been upfront about the issue and most people would not have held it against them. Now...not so sure. But it should be each person's decision to decide for themselves. It should not be covered up.

Well, seems that there are some links ... and that maybe DEA could have developed the investigation .... and brought it out in the open.
After all, a lot of people were badly hurt by the fraud of Chris Mallick and his team ( that includes Shaliza ... ) .
But seems priority differs when $$$$ are involved. :2 cents:

I assume that is the same chick referenced here?



http://www.lukeisback.com/bloglukeis...ph_elkind2.htm

Sad day when a gfy'er speaks the truth, connects the dots and is banned.

Nice. Btw, how many Fabians (ex. Fabian Buys) are there in the biz?

It aint a show if JoeE aint there ;)

Good grief! That's quite a statement.
Good bye DEA.

I say, "Bring DEA back!"

I thought it justified just for the entertainment value.... And also because he cluttered up the home screen with bullshit I didn't care to read about on a daily basis.

Fuck him.

All he ever does is posts inane Epass rants.

he'd still be here if he didnt use the s word

no comment

Bring em back!

I don't think DEA was wrong to present the information that he presented ie the connection but I do think that he has to learn to control himself and not appoint himself Judge, Jury and Executioner without ALL the facts.

I think that is why he was banned, because he cannot learn this.

Moral of the story here for me is that it is good to share information when you find it but you have to let people draw their own conclusions and make their own decisions about who to do business with and the risks.

this is exactly right