![]() |
.XXX Domains: The Not So Hot Numbers...
.XXX domains, The Hard Numbers @ DNN.com
Quote:
|
Unbiased and fair reporting :thumbsup
|
they took in 25 mill in the last quarter ?:disgust
|
Many would expect them to be pulling in numbers? Who are these many?
|
Quote:
ADG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Think of every conversation you have about websites with common, everyday people.
How many of them are about a website that is not a .com? |
Quote:
|
I am sure the fellas at MANWIN are very pleased to hear about these numbers, eh.
|
Wait a couple of months until all those wannabe domainers find out they can't afford to renew those crappy .xxx domains no one is interested in.
|
Fuck dotxxx!!!
|
|
I suspect the most telling figures will be around the end of the year at renewal time.
http://adultking.co.uk/images/domainstats.jpg |
All major registrars are offering big discounts on dotxxx registrations. It is an obvious sign dotxxx has failed.
|
Quote:
|
Fuck .XXX!
|
I'm looking forward for the end of year numbers.
|
.xxx is for people with too much money in their pockets.
|
Quote:
Still good to see they want to launch more of these scamming domains. There's one born every day. :thumbsup |
.pro is a more popular domain than .xxx and I can't remember ever seeing a .pro domain.
|
fuck .xxx
|
|
Prior to the launch, Stuart Lawley claimed that ICMR would be bringing in around $200 million a year though dotxxx. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...6038373596.htm :1orglaugh:1orglaugh
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
it actually makes me feel bad for them... :( I especially liked this part of the article: Quote:
as can be seen by this: Quote:
|
Quote:
"The Internet has made Stuart Lawley a wealthy man. In 1999 he got rich by taking a British Internet service provider public. The London Sunday Times has named him one of the 1,000 richest people in Britain." |
can we say FAIL?
|
Terrible numbers
|
Quote:
Wait a minute - do people actually believe Lawley's figure of 25,000 "built out" .xxx sites? I'd be surprised if there's even 250 outside of place holders, forsale pages and weird junk. 61 .xxx sites in the 1 million on alexa? thats pretty damning. |
I'd imagine now that there is a grandfather clause guaranteeing .xxx domain owners the .porn, .sex, and .adult domains at no cost for reserving the added extensions there will be many more renewals than previously anticipated and registering of .xxx extensions will increase. I will certainly be renewing the 4 .xxx domains I own.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good call. Profits will definitely soar when no one can reach your sites. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's no way that's going to happen before the first renewal period for .XXX domains. Each gTLD application has to go through a rather long approval process, then all applications are subject to objections by various groups with standing to object (and believe me, there will be many objections to .porn, .sex and .adult), and there's no guarantee at all that ICM will ever win approval to administer those three gTLDs. In other words... probably wiser to not count your chickens before the egg has been laid, much less hatched. ;-) I outlined all of this in a post last year -- but you needn't take my word for it on any of this; you can read ICANN's gTLD Applicant Guidebook for yourself. Sure, it's long and dry, but if you are staking your assessment of your .XXX domains' value in part on the prospect of eventually owning the .adult, .sex and .porn versions of those same names, you owe it to yourself to understand the process and the issues. |
Quote:
You should put that "smart investor" grey matter to work and ask yourself why someone like Lawley would want to introduce 3 other extensions to compete with .XXX |
Quote:
I mean no one wanted it to begin with, whether it was bible thumpers or those in the porn industry.. but they wanted to extort people to gain revenue, so they blatantly ignored everyone. I have said all along the only possible outcome from .xxx will be negative one.. aside from the ridiculous pricing that would eat up a good chunk of profit margins, there is also issue of blocking and/or some countries forcing their citizens who own porn sites to use .xxx as a red light district.. just like they restrict adult businesses here in the USA (strip clubs, theaters, adult stores are restricted by zoning to certain areas). I have over 1000 sites.. if I were to switch, that would translate to like $100,000+ a year instead of $8,000+ a year.. which would leave just enough revenue remaining to pay my hosting and employees... of course then I would also have to live in a cardboard box and eat at the soup kitchen.... I wonder if comcast will allow internet service to a cardboard box? |
I track around 4000 keywords, .xxx domains don't rank for any of them. nuff said :2 cents:
|
Quote:
There is also the matter of string contention to consider and the resulting string auctions -- receiving approval and the franchise to operate the .adult, .sex and .porn gTLDs may very well be contested by more than one applicant.stay tuned http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program...cation-results |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc