11 years after 9/11 there are still morons who think that Boeing crashed into the Pentagon
 

and it's not like someone is putting a gun to their head and forcing them to believe this bullshit.
they are doing it themselves.

11 years ago today the Pentagon wanted a $50 Billion Dollar budget increase, on the heels of revealing they had MISPLACED (lost) $2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS!

The next day a missile took out the Pentagon's accounting offices and computers. Then, the next day 911 happened, and guess what?... the Bush/Rumsfeld Pentagon got their $50 BILLION DOLLAR budget increase!



https://youtube.com/watch?v=k1rO4Ivgl4g

Yeah, I believe the government's official 911 story.. and I also believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

Most here aren't ready for the truth

im ready

please tell me the truth

can I peak over your shoulders ?:winkwink:

oh it is that time of the year again, so where did the plane and all the people go?

On September 11, 2011, the building with the most video cameras in the world was the Pentagon. And all they had was one unidentifiable still photo of a "plane."


The flight recorder says that there was 33000 liters of fuel on board the supposed plane that hit the pentagon. That's about the same amount that caused the towers to collapse at the WTC.

Let's see the heat damage at the Pentagon ground zero from this fuel:

http://i.imgur.com/6jMhh.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/bKbUY.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/nMiIJ.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/SqwXi.jpg


So at the WTC it fucking cut through some of the biggest strongest steel beams ever made but at the pentagon it couldn't even melt a plastic monitor case..

http://i.imgur.com/JtZ3t.jpg

It is the law that any aircraft crash site could only be touched by FAA investigators and FBI. When a plane crashes they collect all the pieces and put if back together to see what happened EXCEPT on 9/11 - all that evidence was shipped out of the country.

Remember when Columbia came down over Texas? Everyone was sternly warned by the "media" not to touch anything.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoess...shuttle_11.jpg


Unidentified men gathering up 'wreckage' directly after the strike:

http://www.newsfollowup.com/images/2...missile_lo.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5...4/1600/box.jpg

And criminal investigations are supposed to be conducted with grand juries in all the different jurisdictions and court cases... not some weird committee run by Zelikow where no one has to testify under oath.

There was a simulation with the flight data that basically shows it would have been impossible to fly a jet into the Pentagon from that angle.

http://911review.org/Wget/members.fo...ntagonxox3.jpg

in http://i.imgur.com/nMiIJ.jpgshot you can see how the plane has hit the building - wings have sheared off and the body of the plan has continued through the inside of the pentagon as indicated by the burnt roof above where the plane continued

its interesting to see that vertical shear at the front of the impact site. i cant explain why all the upper levels would have sheared away like that without anything to cut through them. the plane was at ground level so yeah cant explain that

all the fuel onboard - if the roof was burnt like we can see it is but the fire was limited to the path of the plane and immediately surrounding it then i guess we can only assume they have a killer sprinkler system at the pentagon. maybe the building is built from super flame resistant shit. probably. that combined with good sprinklers limited the spread of the fire

i see b3t3k's thread about the missing money - no idea about that - its probably true

doesnt it hit straight on and then follow the path as indicated by the brunt roof through the length of the building ?

Look at the CGI projection photo above. If a Boeing hit the building, the hole would have been 3-4 times larger.

It was a missile or a predator drone.

That's why the building with THE MOST VIDEO CAMERAS IN THE WORLD had only ONE un-identifiable still photo.

One thing that bothers me, aside from absolutely everything else about that day, is the way they totally disregarded the put options on United and American because the people responsible, whose identities were of course suppressed, had no ties to al Qaeda.

Which, far from being a reason to ignore the shady dealing, is surely just more reason to at least consider the possibility that people other than 'al Qaeda' were involved in and/or knew what was about to happen.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GoHu6Kf8Kbw/0.jpg

In real plane crashes you see what looks like a crashed plane, not scraps of metal.

There was also landing gear they found in the Pentagon and it turned out to be landing gear from a crashed airliner that went down in S. America by its serial numbers and it still had the jungle vines on it.

I just don't know what to think, other than governments fuck over people any chance they get.

History books will not be kind to the American Empire after it falls and the real story about all of this comes out.

What a fucking sham. Endless war on terror... Blank check to kill people anywhere anytime.

there used to be a story about some kernel at a local air force base that kept reporting one of his missiles was missing from his inventory...but its long buried

Why do you make FOCUS on the pentagon?

The big attack there was the twin towers...

in the nicholas cage movie, they show that it was a bomb that make it collapse.

Absolutely. The pancake theory, the "freefall speeds", the melted steel, the laws of resistance. It's pretty obvious that 9/11 involved 3 controlled demolitions. To say otherwise is to deny the laws of physics.

WTC Building 7 vs. a Chinese Skyscraper Inferno Which Does Not Collapse:

Omg :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Huge steel beams at WtC 1, 2 and 7 are cut like a cutter's torch on a clean angle cut:

http://i.imgur.com/betyx.jpg

The plane that was meant to hit Building 7 got delayed in airport congestion, that focked up the storyline :2 cents:

I'm not convinced about the twin towers being demolished by explosives, in fact I think those ideas are ludicrous and on the nuttier fringe of 9/11 theories, and draw too much attention away from other aspects of the attack. I'm willing to believe that two massive planes filled with aviation fuel smashing into the towers might have played a part in them falling down.

WTC7, however, was a cast iron controlled demolition. And that alone makes discussion of how the twin towers were brought down redundant.

.

It was probably nano-thermite, people have found traces of it in the dust.

No one is denying that the planes did hit the towers, but the government made sure the buildings would go down by placing explosive charges at key locations.

Do you have some kind of proof for that?

Nevermind, i know the answer already :1orglaugh

The real plane was shot down over the Atlantic. There were several witnesses to this who have now gone missing.

Do you have any proof that 20 people living in caves did it, with box cutters?

My ass walks places.

:1orglaugh

Which didn't get damaged by a huge plane flying in the towers destroying a few levels almost completely :1orglaugh
And then they managed to exactly at that level let the explosives go off and damage the part of the building that wasn't damaged yet so it could go down :1orglaugh

Seriously, just think about your insane theories for a while and then realize how...well...fucking insane they are :1orglaugh

Proof of 20 people living in caves who did it? Huh? No, obviously i don't. I'm not even sure what you are talking about. But that's often the case when the nutters start talking :1orglaugh

Trolls think lots of annoying orange smiley faces help their arguments... lol

That's the only way to react to dumb stoners sitting in their boxers explaining us the biggest conspiracy in the history of the earth. Which they saw on Youtube :1orglaugh

You're not even that good of a troll, you just make a bunch of dumbass assumptions....

Carry on....

Charges were placed in the basement of the buildings, not on the level of planes impact.

Explosives found in World Trade Center dust: scientists discover both residues and unignited fragments of nano-engineered thermitic pyrotechnics in debris from the Twin Towers: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/t..._residues.html

But of course you would know better that a team of physicists, architects and engineers? After all, they told you on the TV that it all was a terrorist doing.

Sorry, I thought you had the remotest clue about what was supposed to have happened on 9/11.

Perhaps you'd like to explain what you believe happened, and then prove it

I don't have a clue what happened, nor will I ever know. However, the following things make my scratch my head:

1) The Pentagon
2) Building 7
3) How these guys could hijack multiple planes with box cutters

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

LOL we will never get anywhere asking questions because no one wants to answer them, like where the fuck are the people that were on the plane?
I get told prove that there were people to begin with lol, ok let me knock on the door of a family member and say "can you prove you really had a dad that was on the plane that crashed in D.C. or are you just making that up to go along with everything so you can get a pay check too"? yeah come on now.
I do not want to get into it but I know for a fact there was a plane and it had people on it and now it is gone. I guess they just flew it into the ocean. As for proving people did it with box cutters?
What about the people that called with their cell phones saying the plane was jacked with people with box cutters? I am wasting my time lol