GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Jill Stein to File for Recounts in MI, WI & PA (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1230649)

Bladewire 11-23-2016 03:16 PM

Jill Stein to File for Recounts in MI, WI & PA
 
Maybe this will push Clinton to do the same? I think the time limit to file is almost up anyone know?

---

Jill Stein?s presidential campaign announced Wednesday that it plans to file for recounts in three key states if it can raise enough money.

?After a divisive and painful presidential race,? the Green Party candidate said in a statement, ?reported hacks into voter and party databases and individual email accounts are causing many Americans to wonder if our election results are reliable.?

Stein wants to request recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania ? states that were critical to President-elect Donald Trump's victory. The GOP candidate carried Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, and is likely to win Michigan, although the state has not yet been officially called.

A Stein spokeswoman said the campaign has not yet filed the official paperwork for the recounts. The campaign needs $2 million to pay for the filing fees and the actual recount process, and it has set up a fundraising website to collect the money.

The deadlines to file for a recount are Friday in Wisconsin, Monday in Pennsylvania and Wednesday in Michigan.


Citing "reported hacks" Jill Stein says she'll file for recounts in three states - POLITICO

bronco67 11-23-2016 03:25 PM

If Jill Stein files, then why would Hillary Clinton need to? The results that affects Stein affect all candidates equally.

I just think if this is going to be a thing, they should get it over with quickly so the president elect doesn't have it hanging over him. He has cabinet positions to fill with the worst backward-thinking dickheads he can find....better not to be distracted by election recounts.

Bladewire 11-23-2016 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21326230)
If Jill Stein files, then why would Hillary Clinton need to? The results that affects Stein affect all candidates equally.

I just think if this is going to be a thing, they should get it over with quickly so the president elect doesn't have it hanging over him.

The filing deadline to recount for each state is Friday, Monday & Wednesday so they better get to it quick!

kkkkkk 11-23-2016 03:35 PM

Bargaining

noshit 11-23-2016 03:38 PM

Clinton can't do it, without exposing DNC fraud
.

Bladewire 11-23-2016 03:56 PM

She's raised over $400,000 so far of $2mill needed in just a few hours.

Pass on this donation URL https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount

Bladewire 11-23-2016 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21326353)
She's raised over $400,000 so far of $2.5mill needed in just a few hours.

Pass on this donation URL https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount

So in 12 minutes it's up to $483,000 already

woj 11-23-2016 04:22 PM

why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

it sounds like it's really Hillary and democratic party throwing a hail marry pass, without exposing themselves as bunch of sore losers...

Bladewire 11-23-2016 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326416)
why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

it sounds like it's really Hillary and democratic party throwing a hail marry pass, without exposing themselves as bunch of sore losers...

The areas with electronic voting are 7% off those with paper ballots and 1% separates a win so it's only logical to do a recount.

Trump said that if he lost he'd refuse to accept the results, Clinton never made such a claim. Trump said the election was rigged, Clinton never made such a claim.

You being a Trump supporter should ideologically be supporting a recount based on your candidates stance, right?

noshit 11-23-2016 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326416)
why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

it sounds like it's really Hillary and democratic party throwing a hail marry pass, without exposing themselves as bunch of sore losers...

Fodder for the Nolts, feeble attempt to gain credibility after rampant voter fraud for Rotten Ham ...almost as bad as the Engineering of Kayne going to a mental ward after supporting Trump

.

woj 11-23-2016 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21326428)
The areas with electronic voting are 7% off those with paper ballots and 1% separates a win so it's only logical to do a recount.

Trump said that if he lost he'd refuse to accept the results, Clinton never made such a claim. Trump said the election was rigged, Clinton never made such a claim.

You being a Trump supporter should ideologically be supporting a recount based on your candidates stance, right?

this is all playing out like some bad tv reality show... everyone considered the election results final, there wasn't even a suggestion that votes should be recounted... now magically 2 weeks later (day or 2 before the deadline) they discover some voting irregularity? and to look into it, Jill instead of Hillary is requesting a recount and is raising money for it? this is all becoming a bit nuts, almost like media/"establishment"/whoever is jerking people around on purpose...

but anyway, if democratic party wants to have a recount, then fair enough, but they should have the balls to push for it themselves, instead of playing these games pretending it's Jill behind it, when Jill has nothing at all to gain from it... :2 cents:

Bladewire 11-23-2016 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326482)
this is all playing out like some bad tv reality show... everyone considered the election results final, there wasn't even a suggestion that votes should be recounted... now magically 2 weeks later (day or 2 before the deadline) they discover some voting irregularity? and to look into it, Jill instead of Hillary is requesting a recount and is raising money for it? this is all becoming a bit nuts, almost like media/"establishment"/whoever is jerking people around on purpose...

but anyway, if democratic party wants to have a recount, then fair enough, but they should have the balls to push for it themselves, instead of playing these games pretending it's Jill behind it, when Jill has nothing at all to gain from it... :2 cents:

This is Jill Steins stance on recounts, it's about integrity in voting:

The Stein/Baraka Green Party Campaign is launching an effort to ensure the integrity of our elections. With your help, we are raising money to demand recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania-- three states where the data suggests a significant need to verify machine-counted vote totals.
This effort to ensure election integrity is in your hands! We need to raise over $2 million by this Friday, 4pm central. In true grassroots fashion, we?re turning to you, the people, and not big-money corporate donors to make this happen.
Your immediate support is crucial - Please donate now and share widely.
We hope to do recounts in all three states. If we only raise sufficient money for two, we will demand recounts in two states. If we only raise enough money for one, we will demand a recount in one state. If we do not raise enough for any recount (which is highly unlikely) we pledge to use the money for election integrity efforts and to promote systemic voting system reform.

Coup 11-23-2016 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326416)
why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

My question is how does this cost 2 million earth dollars?

Bladewire 11-23-2016 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coup (Post 21326518)
My question is how does this cost 2 million earth dollars?

WI & MI are $1 million each charged by the state in filing fees. PA charges $500k.

Grapesoda 11-23-2016 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21326230)
If Jill Stein files, then why would Hillary Clinton need to? The results that affects Stein affect all candidates equally.

I just think if this is going to be a thing, they should get it over with quickly so the president elect doesn't have it hanging over him. He has cabinet positions to fill with the worst backward-thinking dickheads he can find....better not to be distracted by election recounts.

hummmm... maybe trump could get you a sweet spot on the cabinet??? :thumbsup

Bladewire 11-23-2016 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21326389)
So in 12 minutes it's up to $483,000 already

About an hour since this post & credit card donation amount is over $879,298 so if donations continue @ let's say $300k an hour we should have the 2.5 million needed by the morning

https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount


Jill Stein has said funds will go state by state so fist million and the file for WI next million will file for MI next $500k Will file for PA

Dvae 11-23-2016 06:11 PM

More lies from the libtards?

Election integrity experts have independently identified Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as states where "statistical anomalies" raised concerns. Our effort to recount votes in those states is not intended to help Hillary Clinton.

...and who are these "Election integrity experts"

onwebcam 11-23-2016 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 21326692)
More lies from the libtards?

Election integrity experts have independently identified Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as states where "statistical anomalies" raised concerns. Our effort to recount votes in those states is not intended to help Hillary Clinton.

...and who are these "Election integrity experts"

The same experts who predicted her win.

Bladewire 11-23-2016 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 21326692)
More lies from the libtards?

Election integrity experts have independently identified Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as states where "statistical anomalies" raised concerns. Our effort to recount votes in those states is not intended to help Hillary Clinton.

...and who are these "Election integrity experts"

You sound a lot like Relic :1orglaugh

Dvae 11-23-2016 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21326695)
The same experts who predicted her win.

Incidentally also the same people who say the sky is falling on global warming/climate change.

Bladewire 11-23-2016 06:26 PM

$1.1 million raised by Jill Stein certifies Wisconsin recount will be filed by attorneys in Wisconsin this Friday! *

Rochard 11-23-2016 06:31 PM

Something doesn't seem right with this. How is it possible that EVERYONE got this election wrong?

Bladewire 11-23-2016 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21326737)
Something doesn't seem right with this. How is it possible that EVERYONE got this election wrong?


directfiesta 11-23-2016 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21326737)
Something doesn't seem right with this. How is it possible that EVERYONE got this election wrong?

T he Donald said it :


it is rigged !!!!! :)

TCLGirls 11-23-2016 07:18 PM

Impressive fund raising in a short period of time.

onwebcam 11-23-2016 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 21326800)
Impressive fund raising in a short period of time.

It's Hillary supporters. She only raised $3.5 mil her entire presidential campaign.

It's useless as far as unseating Trump that's for sure. But maybe it will tame the libs. These "experts" aren't experts at all. All you have to do is look at the primary's to see a low Dem and high Repub turnout. Then toss in all of the secret Trump voters. Their statistics were flawed to begin with and if they are using those flawed statistics to come to their determination then they get the same results as last.. Wrong results.. The only state that may

2MuchMark 11-23-2016 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21326815)
It's Hillary supporters. She only raised $3.5 mil her entire presidential campaign.

No thatis incorrect. She raised $171.6 Million.

Tracking the 2016 Presidential Money Race: Clinton v Trump

onwebcam 11-23-2016 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 21326872)
No thatis incorrect. She raised $171.6 Million.

Tracking the 2016 Presidential Money Race: Clinton v Trump

Jill Stein, not Hillary. And that's how much cash on hand Hillary has remaining..

woj 11-23-2016 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 21326872)
No thatis incorrect. She raised $171.6 Million.

Tracking the 2016 Presidential Money Race: Clinton v Trump

you looked at it wrong anyway..

Total Raised to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,068.1M
Total Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $897.7M
Total Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $171.6M

pissed away $1B+, all for nothing... :error:1orglaugh

woj 11-23-2016 08:53 PM

looks like Hillary hired Paul too, no wonder he has been acting like a know-it-all big shot lately...

"Top Vendors for Clinton Campaign
OCTOBER 1-19
$30.3M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GMMB
Advertising, consulting, advocacy agency

$3.3M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Markham Productions
Event Production


$3.1M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bully Pulpit Interactive
Online Advertising

$2.2M. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . American Express
Credit card payments"

:1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 11-23-2016 08:59 PM

I just donated to #Recount2016 and to help ensure election integrity. Join me at Election Integrity depends on YOU! - Jill Stein 2016

Bump the Trump 2016

Dvae 11-23-2016 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21326881)
Jill Stein, not Hillary. And that's how much cash on hand Hillary has remaining..

LOL - he has reading comprehension problems just like BW.

kane 11-23-2016 09:06 PM

Trump supporters should be all for this. If it comes out that it was rigged it will prove him right. If it comes out that everything is fine it will end some of the controversy around his win.

Bladewire 11-23-2016 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 21326917)
Trump supporters should be all for this. If it comes out that it was rigged it will prove him right. If it comes out that everything is fine it will end some of the controversy around his win.

Or they know Trump stold the election like Hillary's emails were stolen and they don't want him being outed :1orglaugh

mineistaken 11-23-2016 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326416)
why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

it sounds like it's really Hillary and democratic party throwing a hail marry pass, without exposing themselves as bunch of sore losers...

:2 cents::2 cents:

mineistaken 11-23-2016 09:41 PM

Why no recount in NH?

Bladewire 11-23-2016 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 21326908)
I just donated to #Recount2016 and to help ensure election integrity. Join me at Election Integrity depends on YOU! - Jill Stein 2016

Bump the Trump 2016

Put in my donation earlier let's get this past $2.5 million just to play with the Trumplestilskins for a little while

https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount

Bladewire 11-23-2016 09:56 PM

One of the red flags for recount that the scientists found. All the numbers next to arrows should be the same, but you can see almost 3,000 votes over total ballots cast. How does that happen with electronic voting?

You can't have almost 3,000 more votes than ballots cast.


Jill Stein Just Raised Over $2 Million To Recount Vote In 3 Swing States

onwebcam 11-23-2016 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 21327043)
One of the red flags for recount that the scientists found. All the numbers next to arrows should be the same, but you can see almost 3,000 votes over total votes counted. How does that happen with electronic voting?


Jill Stein Just Raised Over $2 Million To Recount Vote In 3 Swing States

There you have it. Supposed "scientist" is too stupid to realize not everyone casts a vote for all. Bush himself admitted to not casting a vote for President but cast votes for all down ballot.

JFK 11-23-2016 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 21326416)
why would she want to spend $2M on a recount? what could a recount possibly change for her?

it sounds like it's really Hillary and democratic party throwing a hail marry pass, without exposing themselves as bunch of sore losers...

sounds plausable:2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123