![]() |
The memo has been released
Read the memo here: http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/doc...gop-memo/2746/
|
...and it's another nothing burger
|
Jesus Fucking Christ. I just skimmed it because I have a conference call in ten minutes and I need to get ready but... This four page memo is just basically that the DNC funded the opposition research, and this was used to get a FISA warrant? This is old news.
You must be kidding me. This is all they have? |
Quote:
|
This gets dumber by the minute
|
Most bored memo i've ever seen.
|
I wouldn't say it's nothing, but without any true proof it doesn't really do much, but points 2 and 3 are not ''nothing'' Especially 3, where the FBI has tapes of Steele saying he was desperate to not have Trump elected and omit that information on the warrant? That is pretty shady
|
In before....
"This isn't the full memo they had to edit the real bad stuff out for national securty, but trust us Hillary is the devil and Obama is Muslim!" |
I'm not seeing any of the "damage to national security" that the FBI claimed was in the memo. The only damage is to the FBI's reputation.
. |
Quote:
Nunes and Trump are trying to purposely mislead the public with this memo as a way to make it appear the FBI was after Trump.. Facts dont mean much to weasels and liars.. |
SO Christopher Steele was making shit up in the dossier, then leaking the false info to Yahoo News?? And you clowns think the fake dossier is gospel??
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Christopher Steele is an ex-Cambridge Union president, ex-M.I.6 Moscow field agent, ex-head of M.I.6?s Russia desk and an ex-adviser to British Special Forces on capture-or-kill ops in Afghanistan. It's not like Steele us some shady private investigator picked out of the Yellow Pages and paid to make up lies about someone to get them in trouble. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
why whould anybody care?
|
Also how come no one is talking about how Hillary colluded with Russian in an attempt to win the Election. It's pretty clear and out in the open. Steele was for sure getting information on Trump from people in the Russian government. What am I missing here?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Page had been under survalance for 3 years prior. The warrant was just a continuous renewal.. Trump/Nunes are trying to play it off like it was a new thing by purposely omitting the fact that Page was already under survalance.. Hence the reason the FBI and democrats called them out on their bullshit.. The only people fooled by this nonsense is people who "want" to be fooled.. Its akready publicly known page was under survalance long before he joined Trump's team.. But don't let facts get in your way.. |
Public evidence at hand suggests that arguments that the FBI’s warrant application — which was found to be robust enough to be renewed by Trump appointee Rod J. Rosenstein in the spring — was based solely or primarily on politically motivated research from Steele aren’t backed up by what’s already publicly known.
Three years before Page became an adviser to the Trump campaign, he came to the attention of FBI counterintelligence agents, who learned that Russian spy suspects had sought to use Page as a source for information, he was being watched since then. All this memo is about is the renewal of that application, yet as we also know.. There’s no indication or proof that Steele knew who the client was for whom he was indirectly working for. Trumps fucked. |
Quote:
^^ Read it Carefully, clueless libs- These are crimes :2 cents: :rasta |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why does the Republican party constantly go back to Hillary? The hatred the Republican party has for her is vile. The Republican party has made her out to be this master criminal mastermind, but yet investigation after investigation have provided us with nothing at all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The facts aren't important. Not only does this "memo" fail to mention Page, it also fails to mention the dossier was originally funded by Republicans. |
Funny watching chat across the internet if the roles were reversed the Democrats would be raising holy hell like the Republicans are and they would be totally justified about there rage :2 cents:
|
So the DNC paid to have the dossier about Trump-Russia collusion manufactured, so they could use FISA surveillance (normally reserved only for known terrorists for sake of national security) to spy on the Trump campaign, in hopes of finding some kind of REAL dirt on Trump, in order for it to be leaked to the media and destroy his campaign?
Yeah, so what? Big deal. Now if they'd put as much effort into impeaching Trump for colluding with Russia to steal the election from Hillary, then Hillary would be sitting in the White House right now. When is THAT going to happen? Vote Hillary 2020, 4 more years!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump?Russia_dossier The dossier and the investigations preceding it were part of opposition research on Trump. The investigation into Trump was initially funded by a conservative political website before Steele was involved, and later was funded by Democrats. The dossier was originally funded by consertive website freebeacon.com it was later taken by the DNC |
Quote:
This memo was likely written by Trump's lawyers... In short if it's pro your guy it doesn't matter there are conflicts of interest, but anti your guy conflicts are bad mummkay.. Not to mention Nunes claimed to recuse himself from the investigation due to his "conflicts of interest" but still involves himself and releases a memo.. Imagine the rage if Obama had done that with Benghazi.. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
FACT: The memo proves the Russia collusion investigation is based on lies that were paid for by the DNC, colluding with Russians, in an attempt to INFLUENCE THE ELECTION. SO, have you guys accepted the election results yet? It wasn't the Russians, she just lost- BIGLY! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Republicans paid for opposition research on Trump. Opposition research is is routine in political elections. Once Trump became the Republican nominee, the DNC picked up the tab. This is opposition research. There is nothing wrong with this. There is nothing illegal with opposition research. As is plainly the case here, both sides do this. This is routine. This memo is trying to make it out like the DNC hired Steele and GPS Fusion to make Trump look bad. This is false. The Republicans originally hired Steele and GPS Fusion. This opposition research / dossier was only a part of the investigation that lead to FISA warrants. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information." https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/25/u...-expained.html |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc