PATENT TROLL ALERT: attention affiliate programs
 

There is a company called BTG that has acquired a patent that they believe is the basis for affiliate programs.

The link to the patent is here:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...&RS=PN/5712979

The cliff notes version is that if you have a link like http://www.sponsorwebsite.com/cgi/af...ram.cgi?id=123

which the receiving end uses the id number to identify you as the affiliate, and to redirect the web browser to whatever page and track the stats....

BTG is currently suing Amazon and some other companies. Barnes and Nobles already settled.

BTG could target the adult internet space, and thats the reason why assistance for prior art to help amazon squash this patent is going to help everyone in the end.

What is needed is some kind of evidence that proves that the affiliate linking codes were around prior to sept 1995.

Most likely there isn't much documentation, so there might need to be more of "expert witness"... having checks made to affiliates would certainly be some tangible proof of an affiliate linking system.

The attorneys for amazon have already chatted with CE.

I just chatted with Dave (sextoy), but he wasn't in operation early enough.

I have seen the name Robin passed around before as being the original guy who did the first affiliate program.

I am looking for contacts and evidence.

I am not seeking any consulting fees from amazon attorneys in this matter. My first thought, was let them take care of their own battles since mainstream didn't step in to help with the Acacia issue.. but then i thought about it a little more, and it's their money going to pay attorneys to defeat this patent that could eventually target the adult biz.. so that in itself is the motiviation to help amazon.

Amazon has alot of very questionable patents themselves, but they haven't come out swinging against other companies, and they are clearly up at bat on this patent infringement case.

Any info would be greatly appreciated. contact me via email (brandon - at - fightthepatent.com), or icq 52741957.

Amazon will be going to court end of January, so they are in the 11th hour. They have been searching for prior art for the last year, and never approached the adult space... which naturally should be the first place to look.

All information is held confidential and i can continue the conversation offline with those that have the silver bullets.


Fight the Patent!

So another acacia is going for the gusto?

OH man...

How many times do I have to say it.

I invented Affiliate Program concepts, or Ron did it can not be decided yet.

i think evan should sue them.

Judging on how both of you ended up, I am going to have to go with Ron on this one.

They should have learned from Acacia, and trolled through the adult internet space.... stay away from the HomeGrownVideo and Video Secrets, Lightsppeds, AEBN, hotmovies.com, etc.. and go after those that settled with Acacia.

I am sure tho this time around, many would have fought instead of settled.. fortunately, BTG has instead gone for the "high hanging fruit" with deeper pockets.

They must think they really got a winner to take on amazon, but clearly, the people who filed this patent copied what was going on in adult.



Fight the trolls!

This patent app might pre-date their patent... already got an email out to Michael.


Fight the datestamp!

didnt amazon try to sue claiming they owned the shopping cart idea?

duke

great, then send me the business plan, technical schematics, or napkin doodling that can support your claim :)


Fight the paper trail!

Man, that's going back a ways and going pre Ron will be tough.

Have you tried contacting Amateur Harcore?
Smutland?
Babylon?

brandon thanks for the info but unfortunately 80% percent will rollover.

ya.. .. amazon even tried to patent the affiliate program themselves, but failed since they were too late in their filing.

that's why at first, i was like, let amazon fight their own battles, but since they do have the money to fight, and will fight, better that they knock this one down, instead of buying the patent and then maybe using it to corner the online affiliate marketing space.

Fight the all your affiliate links are belong to us!

i have seen many names thrown around in various posts before, but some, I don't know how to reach... So i though it be more effective to put a post out, so that those people who know the right people could contact them and direct them to me.



Fight the bell ringing!

don't forget, that according to patent law, that they can also go after individual affiliates... while sponsor programs are the obvious target, but by using an affiliate link that isn't "licensed" by the sponsor program, makes you a contributory infringer.. which was the acacia-style of patent infringement targeting.


Fight the indirect infringers!

As far as who came out with what and when - one of the best sources (cringe) is Serge.
For actual contact info of any named people, PK is a good source.

IN all reality I am sure it would behove you to get in contact with Ron. He might have some scribling actually, if he does not its somewhere in the volumes of stuff his guys masterminded from the early day.

My scriblings were done on an white erasable white board sometime in 1995.

Damn...... Nothing surprises me anymore.

amazon attorneys have already contacted ron, but i guess they didn't get very far since they are still looking for prior art.


Fight the do not disturb!

That's what Al Gore said but nobody seemed to believe him.


Fight the pun!

Good Luck Brandon :thumbsup

bump for a good cause

Al Hadhazy got it before Ron, came up with the affiliate program in 1996.

Maybe you have some pictures of people standing in front of a white board that described linking to affiliate programs?

:1orglaugh

Fight the 1000 words!

I had a sponsor program on one of my sites back in 1994-95, but I don't remember specifically what date I signed up. They disappeared but later resurfaced as ClickCash.

I have a banner from that program but I can skim through archive.org to see if I can dig out the actual code and the date.

They only archived it as of 1/98, sorry, but that banner is still on the site but only goes to tracker.exe and a WebPower IP.

I'll look around and see if I can find anything else

heya serge, problem is, this patent has a filing date of sept 1995.


Fight the close but no cigar!

Well I know what I did in 95...

But I cant prove it!

Damn...

Serge pass the wine.

hmm hope these guys get taken out

Ehhehe:)

They probably didnt offer enough. :1orglaugh

amazon could certainly offer them enough to just buy the patent out and do what they will, if prior art can't be found to refute what we all to believe a no brainer copycat from adult biz.


Fight the counteroffer!

well,
my proggy haven't violated no patents,
my affiliates were:
http://cotac.com/~knight/DannyCox/
etc, etc, etc
and as far as I know Danny AND his Cox are public domain.

i believe that technically, your link that redirected someone to hahahahahahahahahahahahaha would fall under this patent

:)


Fight the doh!

looks like you can't use winetalk + .com in a sentence, or else you get the hahahhahahaha.. ... clever serge on the redirect :thumbsup


Fight the hahhahahahaah!

you are correct. The affiliate program was creation of adult business first. I remember almost to the day how affiliate programs came into adult world.

I was listening to the radio, Bloomberg, aroung May of 1996 and I heard report that Yahoo was charging Procter and Gamble 5 cents per click thru on their banners. I e-mailed Al Hadhazy and offered him to pay COTAC 5 cents per click instead of fixed weekly rates. Everybody were happy for a week, 'til his and my counts started drifting apart. To make the long story short,
he launched his first affiliate proggy in August and paid per click.

no, it won't, as my affiliate is identified by NAME and NOT by number.

I can't?
yes, I can,
I use
http://talkwine.com
and few 182,034 orphan domains registered with Directnic,
it always pays to have friends in high places
;)

the patent addresses an identifier tacked on to the end of the URL.. which could be a number or a name or a letter, or a folder, etc ..anything that causes a redirect based upon the constructed URL.


Fight the details schmetails!

Didn't Validate use a system similar to that back in 91?

if only emmaculate conception of ideas could be documented!


Fight the idea birth certificate!

Serge, although the document says 'identification number' the diagrams distinguish the affiliate as /CM1/ in other words letters and number and by directory *either that or I haven't looked at or understood all the diagrams.

Image/Sample I'm looking at

Also, the diagrams are dated January 27th, 1998 is that wrong?

Well here we go again everybody get their checkbooks ready cause I didn't pay arcadia a fucking penny and this piece of shit place won't get any of my money either. But you guys that paid Arcadia feel free to pay these guys too and the next one that comes out and the next one.

Mark