A question about GFY Rule #9 ... "Proof or Ban"
 

gfy rules are not stone, never have been.

The program is under no obligation to pay any attention to you.

The rule is there to stop people making shit up and accusing someone of something they haven't done.

Interesting point.

You're saying the program has no obligation to respond.

Okay then, let's say that the program DOES respond, I think there should be a requirement that the response be "responsive" and not "evasive".
.
.

my pov on this.. if someone /company fucked/screwed/ owes you money and you have some sort of "proof" and arent just doing it to fuck someone up then go for it..


alot of these fuckwads I have noticed try to fuck ya then when GFY is brought into it the issue gets "resolved" most of the time..

I would just do it as long as you have some good juice

your posts always give me a boner...




.

I am so hard now , gonna drizzle some oil on myself

it's not a courhouse, people. That rule simply exist to keep people from dragging someone else's name thru the mud

It should fall on the accuser to provide proof or be banned not the other way around.

Correct.

If you are going to accuse someone of something, have proof and post it with the O.P. or , with allegation. If you do not have that, you should be banned according to the rules.

The rule exists because of people take their personal vendettas and agenda to the boards in an attempt to smear someone's name and business based on the "so I heard", or the half truths, third party stories, or making statements with a questions mark, and those similar type of remarks with nothing to back them up.

Hence the rule.